• Briongloid@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most Androids still only get USB2.0, but not the ones that are in the price range of the iPhone.

        Edit: Feels like I’m back on Reddit with people not reading my comment, I just said that although most units of Android phones are budget to mid-range, mine being a mid-range (Poco F3), Android phones anywhere near the range of an iPhone in Cost is USB 3.0+

        • Acters@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cheap as in 100 and less brand new? The third-party market can get you a usb3 type c port from a 2 year old phone at that price range. This is cheap to have. Apple is not doing it because it costs money, but it is a plus for them. They are doing it to push power users, who know enough about technical specs, to buy the more expensive product. The pro has USB 3, and even then, the charging speeds are 12 watt. They are trickling the upgrades ever slower now because the technological advances have slowed down. They are doing it to create hype and advertising the new stuff every year instead of drastically changing their product. It is planned absolesence from making certain parts weak on purpose.

        • Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I bought my oneplus 10 pro for sub $500 during a sale, and it has usb3.1. It’s last year’s model. You can get a pixel 6 with usb3.1 for less than $400. A Galaxy S21 has usb3.2, less than $500.

          That’s almost every major android brand for $500 or less with 3.1 or better. The cheapest you can buy an iPhone 15, the one with usb2.0, is $800. What are you on about?

    • pedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t use data on the USB port very often and when I do it’s always to make an access point over USB so the USB2.0 bandwidth is enough for my use.

      I wonder if people really have a use for USB3.

      Apart from making phone more expensive, I don’t see a real need for me

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Argument can be made if your camera doesn’t support 4k or 60fps, there’s very little need for higher speeds than USB2.0 since files generated won’t be as big. However if you keep using your phone as a camera to record long videos, then yes it’s annoying to have slower interface.

        • pedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a valid point.

          Also is there’s a USB3 controller at all in the phone to connect the camera inside the phone? Or does the camera talk on a different bus on the SoC?

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            With Apple devices I honestly don’t know. With others SoC is the one exposing the rest of the hardware and acts are intermediate. Historically in general giving DMA access to any hardware on the system has proven fatal when it comes to security. You do gain speed, but expose so much in the process.