Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoBillionaire grindsetlemmy.worldimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1316arrow-down151
arrow-up1265arrow-down1imageBillionaire grindsetlemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareVigge93@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up47·1 year agoBut in this case it does, or at least it should, since the IQ scale is based on a normal distribution which is symmetric along the mean.
minus-squaredadarobot@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoBut wouldn’t a certain amount have the same ig right at the median, meaning less than half would actually be above (and also below)?
minus-squareVigge93@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoIt depends on if we assume a discrete or continuous distribution.
But in this case it does, or at least it should, since the IQ scale is based on a normal distribution which is symmetric along the mean.
Dang, you are right
But wouldn’t a certain amount have the same ig right at the median, meaning less than half would actually be above (and also below)?
It depends on if we assume a discrete or continuous distribution.