• squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is that the things they “disagree” about are sometimes basic scientific facts, like climate change, or beliefs which strongly affect people’s lives negatively, such as racism, anti-lgbt bigotry, or economic views like “it’s just fine to pay people such low wages they can barely afford to live and will never be able to buy a house”.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      And why are these politics an issue in the workplace?

      I’m 52 and have worked a wide variety of jobs. Nowhere I have worked was it acceptable to talk politics, except on the down low with people you knew well. If there was a political discussion where two people disagreed, they either agreed to disagree, or it was quickly dropped.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because whether some people are allowed to exist is politics now, and gen z and others aren’t going to quietly let bosses/coworkers banally brutalize people anymore without pushback.

        The workplace is steeped in politics, like every other part of your life. The discussions dont have to be about politics day in day out, but somethings have to be addressed directly, work or not.

        Basically, if youre workplace is fair and decent, then you likely wont hear anyhting about politics. if it’s full of bigots/abuse, well, people arent putting up with it anymore.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not really sure what the person in the article means. It says something about “lockdown-era students can’t hold down a heated discussion”… but why would they be having heated discussions? It also says

        Miami University even organized a dinner with senior leaders in order to teach proper mealtime etiquette, such as how to engage in conversation on neutral topics.

        which makes it sound like it’s older people who bring up inappropriate political topics in an inflammatory way.

      • leftzero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because scientific facts, or social and economic issues (that definitely affect and belong in the workplace) are not “politics” regardless of how much you’d like to label them as such so you can shove them under the rug and forget about them, you retrograde fossilized lich, and because “agreeing to disagree” with assholes who hold harmful opinions only serves to empower them and enable them to keep causing harm.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go ahead, pick fights at work. See how that works out for you. According to the story, it ain’t working out.

          My current company is a Seattle based software dev, about as liberal as it gets. You come talking politics and arguing with people, even though you’re on the “right” side, and you’re fucking fired. Bye.

      • ArtieShaw@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like you, I’ve moved around the US quite a bit have have worked at a variety of companies. But I noticed that the article mentions Miami University, which is in southwestern Ohio. People around here have an odd idea of what constitutes rudeness or what should not be discussed at work.

        They are ALL IN on politics.

        Visitors to our work’s Ohio location (from out of country or out of state) are completely freaked out by it. Locals have no idea that their behavior might be considered rude or inappropriate.

        Long story short, I’m not even remotely surprised that a local school is trying to teach people manners.