inconel@lemmy.ca to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoIf number of undiagnosed neurodivergent people proves to be significant portion, neurotypical means just people who won the standards war of communication protocolmessage-squaremessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1258arrow-down134file-text
arrow-up1224arrow-down1message-squareIf number of undiagnosed neurodivergent people proves to be significant portion, neurotypical means just people who won the standards war of communication protocolinconel@lemmy.ca to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareChickenstalker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·1 year agoI feel that people with mental disabilities/conditions have latched onto the medical “neurodivergent” term as a political “us against them” label. This can backfire spectacularly.
minus-squareNightAuthor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoDisability, mental disorder, retard, etc etc etc The words used to objectively discuss people who are different seem to always drift towards derogatory uses. So we shed those labels, come up with new ones… and the cycle continues. If someone cared to find a citation, I’m sure something exists on google scholar.
minus-squareimaqtpie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoI believe it’s known as the lexical treadmill
minus-squareimaqtpie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI’m not so sure. I feel like the term is so broad and vague that it makes it difficult to attack them as a group. Which is presumably the point.
I feel that people with mental disabilities/conditions have latched onto the medical “neurodivergent” term as a political “us against them” label. This can backfire spectacularly.
Disability, mental disorder, retard, etc etc etc
The words used to objectively discuss people who are different seem to always drift towards derogatory uses.
So we shed those labels, come up with new ones… and the cycle continues.
If someone cared to find a citation, I’m sure something exists on google scholar.
I believe it’s known as the lexical treadmill
I’m not so sure. I feel like the term is so broad and vague that it makes it difficult to attack them as a group. Which is presumably the point.