The Grace Hopper Celebration is meant to unite women in tech. This year droves of men came looking for jobs.

  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Women face a huge amount of bias in the tech industry. There’s nothing wrong with giving the disadvantages an advantage.

    Us men are basically crying because women are getting what we’ve had the whole time.

    Obviously what you describe would be ideal but even that doesn’t even the playing field. Once hired women still face that same bias. They are less likely to be taken seriously as professionals (particularly by the higher ups who tend towards old white men) and more likely to be passed over for promotions.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve seen it happen multiple times, especially in more corporate jobs.

        I try to very specifically mention who came up with ideas even if it’s my work for this reason.

        Another common one is not wanting to ask simple questions in meetings as it makes them look less intelegent. While I ask every stupid question I can think of to be sure and look like I’m invested.

        My advice is talk to your manager about things like that instead of helping. I know it feels like a dick move but it’s not your job to help someone else with basic stuff.

        Something along the lines of “I think John may require more training as I’m having to help him a lot with simple things. I’m happy to do it but my deadlines will need adjusting”

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Disadvantages groups need help to gain equal footing first. Before we can even talk about equality.

          • Lmaydev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The easiest is incentives to hire minorities (gender, sexual, race, disabled, etc.) to level the playing field first.

            This takes away a large part of the privilege that is at play in the tech industry.

            As more of these minorities get higher in the industry the implicit biases will begin to disappear.

            Many of the people who currently experience the privilege will be pissed off and view it as unfair. But in reality they’re getting a taste of what other minorities already experience.

            And in my experience (roughly 20 years) the more diverse a team the better the solutions and diversity in thinking you get.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              That sounds good. But what does equal footing look like in hiring process?

              You’ve described a steady end state, and I agree that’s a good end state.

    • cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Females have a hard time in tech, not women. anyone can be a women. but historically only females were the ones disadvantaged. Transgender women are actually over represented in tech as a proportion of population.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No I don’t mean that because I’m not an incel.

        Transgender women are actually over represented in tech as a proportion of population.

        That’s great.

    • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      So one form of discrimination was wrong, but this version is ok? No. We should learn from past mistakes, not essentially replicate them with the only difference being we flipped the men/women position.

      Also, article states women make up a third of tech jobs. A third. That’s a really good chunk. I think the battle for women in tech jobs is over.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re only looking at things at a surface level. If you don’t correct the wrong, the “level playing field” is only an illusion. companies can’t easily correct why less women choose careers in tech, but they can make moves to correct the problem at their level. Extend and push for parental leave policies where the non-child barring spouse also takes time off for example. Women often see career growth plateau vs non-child barring co-workers due to this missed time. Traditionally this has meant women fall behind men.

        Otherwise if you tomorrow just remove gender from Resumes, Men will still have an advantage, because they had the advantage in the past. It would take an entire generation to sort itself out assuming every inherent bias disappears and they absolutely won’t.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe if you live in a world with no depth and only have a shallow understanding of anything.

        The kind of discrimination that is problematic is the kind that is unjust or unfairly prejudicial. The kind where we respect people’s differences and historical lack of representation is not problematic.