San Francisco says tiny sleeping ‘pods,’ which cost $700 a month and became a big hit with tech workers, are not up to code::The pods, which are 4-foot-high boxes constructed from wood and steel, made headlines after tech workers praised the spaces.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Late stage capitalism? They were doing shit like this in the 1800s. It IS capitalism.

    • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No. This is actually perfectly normal and has been throughout history.

      This is a flophouse/hostel/barracks by another name. The concept of these largely predate (modern) capitalism and they are still a very popular model in a lot of high population density cities.

      When I was younger, I loved when stuff like this was available because I tend to not spend a lot of time in my hotel when I am on holiday. As I’ve gotten older I have decided it is more important to have a place to stretch out and my own private bathroom but… it was really nice back in the day.

      The relative cost and code violations… also just speak to the relative cost of housing. Which is “normal” capitalism.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaking of the relative cost of housing, you can buy an actual whole house in other parts of the USA for that much a month. That could be a 30-year mortgage payment on a 100k house.

        • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          In San Francisco/Bay Area that doesn’t even cover a parking space per month.

          In the US, the average home price sold was $495k. Where can you find a $100k house that doesn’t need a tear down or complete renovation?

          source

            • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              My first house was a 3 bedroom, 2 bath in rural Texas for 5k more than that. That was 14 years ago. I just looked it up and it’s currently $130k. It was built in the 90s, is brick, and still looks pretty good.

              • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nope, I simply answered their question: “In the US, the average home price sold was $495k. Where can you find a $100k house that doesn’t need a tear down or complete renovation?”

            • Nobsi@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              My guy that is a 1900 built House. That is an immediate teardown on purchase.

              • Enigma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                What? Just because a house is old, doesn’t mean it isn’t still habitable. If a house that old is still standing and in good condition chances are it’s built better than new builds. And by the pictures, previous owners have taken a lot of care in it and upgraded it. Sure, the cosmetics may need to change depending on your preferences, but there is nothing wrong with that house structurally.

    • triclops6@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok obligatory fuck late stage capitalism. That said, hot take, this is a perfectly valid move, 700 for location and a box to sleep in is a welcome option for many renters in the city. If there are shared spaces like kitchen baths etc this works.

      If you want your own space, ok, this isn’t for you, but this alleviates a ton of rental demand which could lower rents in aggregate if enough of these are built!

      The alternative is your whole paycheck goes to rent and you retire a week before death, i’d be all for this if I were single.

      Is someone making a profit? Most definitely, but I get a better option to run my career in the city, I’m down. Not only that, I hope this model picks up so more people can have the option.

      My gripe here is the city, bitching about no windows when this is a pretty tangible solution to many renter’s problems. Either fix it yourself or get out the way when others are addressing it.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a dormitory with a shared living space, bathrooms and shower. If anything the “bunks” are quite generously sized.

      Take a look at your comment and ask if maybe you’re flipping out unnecessarily.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This kid must be like 17-18 and has seen none of the world. This would be luxury to half the planet.

      • skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        half the planet lmao, no. Secondly you can point at the US why it’s so bad in those countries too

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      ugh, this is dysphorian THIS IS NOT FUCKING NORMAL. THIS IS LATE STAGE CAPITALISM