So this started coming up today. On every video. I can (so far) click the “x” and remove it to watch (still see 2 ads before the video, and one after 4 minutes - ruins music on YT), but did click the “Report issue” only for the dialogue box not to work.

I found a link to a that said 11% use adblock. Thats not a lot.Maaayyyybe there is a problem with the amount of ads youtube forces down our throats for even short videos. 🤷‍♂️

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    272
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their detection script is probably trying so hard that it hits false positives.

    Ironically, with an up-to-date uBlock Origin, you wouldn’t see this popup.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really is given that they’ve willingly entered a game of cat and mouse and chosen to assume the role of a blind, limbless mouse.

        As others have said before me, I feel for the poor engineers who have to implement this stuff as any technical solution short of DRM is provably impractical and unworkable.

        • Platform27@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          any technical solution short of DRM is provably impractical and unworkable.

          Don’t give them ideas.

          • nottheengineer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            63
            ·
            1 year ago

            They already have plans to DRM the entire fucking web. That’s why I am currently cutting google out of my life step by step.

            • Platform27@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, YT is the last holdout for me. It’s literally the only Google service I willingly sign up for. I’ve tried Piped/Invidious, but they don’t match YTs quality.

            • feinstruktur@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So, give me a heads up if you find a reliably working alternative for their FCM that enables common apps to … work, e.g. mobile payment (not crypto), alarm messaging for emergency forces, e.g. firefighters. I’d say one can easily step back from google if you rely on independent apps and services (done that for a couple of years). But without FCM some shit simply doesn’t work.

            • eric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s bullshit like this that made me give up all Chromium browsers earlier this year. I used to be a complete Google simp, but those days are well behind me. They’re motto these days might as well be “Do evil.”

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I went from loving Google (had the HYC Dream, the first Android phone!)

                Many years ago I cut em out. Now I have no google products and do not use their services.

                • eric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I also had the HTC Dream (called the TMobile G1 in the US). Only google product I haven’t been able to ditch is gmail.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure what you mean by “short of DRM”, because YouTube already does what it can to prevent unauthorised clients accessing it. (Have you seen how unreliable “YouTube downloaders” can be, especially for very long videos or in resolutions above HD?) But ultimately the flaw in any DRM-style solution is that the end result still needs to be able to be played back on client-controlled systems, and that is always going to provide an avenue for exploitation. It can’t be avoided.

          • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use an automated YouTube downloader as part of my media lab and have had a 100% success rate for downloads over several years, so, sincerely, I don’t know what you mean.

            And yes, my argument wasn’t that DRM is flawless, just that it’s a feasible next step in Google trying to achieve their purpose.

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          as any technical solution short of DRM is provably impractical and unworkable.

          Oh, that’s why WebDRM.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I feel for the poor engineers who have to implement this stuff

          I don’t. They had every opportunity to do the ethical thing and refuse to implement it, but didn’t.

          On a related note, the industry norms need to be changed such that software engineers should be licensed Professional Engineers, should be unionized, or both.

          (I say this as a software engineer myself, by the way.)

          • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I also work in industry as a software engineer, tech lead, and occasional eng manager and haven’t seen anyone do this over several decades.

            I don’t think many people, software engineers included, are troubled by YouTube wanting to monetize their platform or defending their right to do so. It’s opting for such an easily bypassed method that makes this such a chore for the implementor.

            It’s also bold to assume they might not have suggested, prototyped or specced other solutions to this problem but were still tasked with this one for whatever reason. Either way, I’d rather assume good intent and high locus than assume they are “trapped” in to implementing software that defies their own moral beliefs.

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          DRM isn’t effective on its own, it needs law with severe punishment to survive

    • Goodie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you sure? Or is it because you’re not in the test group?

      I’m on nightly/up to date ublock and i see it.

      • Silejonu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you update your filters?

        I had the pop-up today, updated my filters then reloaded the page, and the warning was gone.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure, as I saw the popup multiple times, updated uBlock filters and didn’t see them again since.

        • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no test group

          They are almost certainly talking about a test group on YouTube, not uBlock Origin. Sites do that sometimes, it’s called A/B Testing. Where different users will get different versions of the site to test something or other before changes are rolled out for all users.

          • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, the second sentence made it sound like they were questioning the uBlock implementation, not YouTube’s.

            And not just sites, but all forms of software can implement A/B and multivariate tests, including software like uBlock Origin. I’ve implemented A/B and multivariate tests before, and have even co-designed and developed an experimentation platform, so it’s a subject close to my heart!

    • RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I started getting this last night even with UO before I realized FF was waiting for me to restart for an update.

      Oops.

  • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard Firefox’s inbuilt tracking protection often trips whatever detection method they’re using, and like, I’m not turning that off for Youtube.

    • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Quick someone post that 3rd party YouTube interface for Android. Preferably on F-Roids. I need it.

      This is the Internet so let’s settle this quickly and efficiently.

      The best 3rd party YouTube interface is called Kuhmbus.

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How dare you complain about their aggressive monetization practices, won’t you think of the record corporate profits.

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought YouTube posters could choose if their video is monetized. Isn’t this kinda on the person who posted it?

        • Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          LOL I remember when there was no better alternative to buying shitloads of CDs. In some ways I miss the relationship I had with music back then. My sister beat the shit out of me one time for sneaking in her room to copy a bunch of her CDs. Made a big song and dance about the ethics of music piracy!

          In that scenario though, your best bet would be to buy more than one CD, rip them to a computer with a USB optical drive, and make yourself playlists that are 8 hours long. I certainly would never advocate downloading music with filesharing software like soulseek.

          • dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I too miss the days of CDs.

            There was even a time when Music Zone (store in the UK) would let you return cds. Well it was free reign to buy them, copy them and then return the original.

            I recall having a printer that could print the album art on them.

            Or even recording from the radio on to tape or mini disc. And even Smash Hits for lyrics.

            You’re right, relationships with music were different than they are now.

            I can’t lie though some things are better now. Take Apple Classical for instance. I can listen to the music entire collection of classical music by opening an app. It’s amazing.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol that’s like too funny now. Hitting legitimate users with the nagware, so that the only ones having a good experience are the pirates :D Tale as old as the first VHS tape

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s something that I “don’t allow” Google:

    Letting corporations use MY computer equipment and MY Internet connect to conduct their business. I’ll block whatever I want and if Google and YouTube don’t like it, they can take their advertising machine, roll it up real tight and cram it.

  • batmangrundies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have a family premium plan and I still got this message. Guess I’ll cancel YouTube Premium now…

    I get most of the content I want via patreon anyway now.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, you already pay for an ad-free experience and they still want you to turn off ad-block so they can track you more efficiently. That’s vile.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is a false positive as Googlie tries to find a way to detect and block adblockers on browsers they don’t control. install ublock origin and it should solve the issue.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those end cards suck, though it’s usually the creator’s fault. Put them where there is no content at the end, not when I’m still waiting for the punchline!

      • Fisch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You just need to update you filter lists. Go into settings -> filter lists and click on “Purge all caches” and then on “Update now”

        • vinyl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are targeting a portion of users, but once you’re chosen to be the test target, you’ll see.

          • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I just commented to another user about the same things. Seems they’re doing some A/B testing or something like it. No worries, I understand uBlock has an update available that addresses it already.

    • sw2de3fr4gt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m ok with In-video sponsors though. You can always skip them (unlike YouTube ads) and the money goes straight to the content creator.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does skip them, just automatically.

        Plus you can skip intros, outros, and about a dozen of other things.

        • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s great most of the time, but occasionally it will skip sections that are definitely not an ad and instead an important part of the video.

          • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It has non-ad settings, like intro, outro, recap, etc.

            Be sure to check your settings, as not just adverts are on by default.

            If it’s not that, make sure to “thumbs down” the skip when it pops up as that helps the system as a whole.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had no idea Sponsor Block was available as an FF addon. Any idea if it works on FF mobile?

      • Kissaki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        FF mobile currently has a very selected list of available extensions, which does not include it yet.

        But that’s about to change before the end of the year. FF mobile is finally opening up add on usability and distribution.

        • Knacht @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m in Ohio. Any combination of words that has “Vance” in it and I want too throw up…

      • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any idea if it works on FF mobile?

        Not through the official firefox mobile. Maybe you can get it to work with firefox nightly, but I haven’t tested myself.

        But I can recommend Libretube or Newpipe X sponsorblock x return youtube dislike. If you haven’t installed Fdroid I can recommend that as well. It functions as an appstore (Like the PlayStore), and you can find/upgrade the apps through there. Otherwise you may find the apks manually on github

        Though luck if you’re on iOS, bur I assume you’re on Android.

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use a Firefox extension to redirect any YouTube links to open in Ungoogled Chromium, which so far seems to be immune to Google’s anti-Adblock campaign.

    edit: Extension is called Open In

  • glimpseintotheshit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Got that too (Firefox and ublock origin). So far i can just click the X and continue to watch without ads. Pops up about every third video.

  • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you have Firefox’s tracker blocking enabled? That can block some advertising related code and as such will also get detected as an adblocker. I’ve had that be the issue for other websites that block ad blockers in the past before I stopped being willing to ever turn Ublock Origin off.