Most boomers spent the 60s beating the shit out of Civil Rights protestors and spitting on children because their schools were desegregated.
I think that’s just a Southern thing. Living in the North, my grandparents never discussed beating the shit out of civil rights protesters. Nor did they spout overtly racist things.
They were prejudice, but it was more of a I’ve never seen anyone with that color skin and it’s different so I’m uncomfortable.
Yeah if they never told their grandkids they were huge pieces of shit, they most not have been. That absolutely proves they were part of the 1% of that generation actually on the right side of history.
It’s not like as a generation they’ve spent 60 years lying about what they were like back then…
There is a good chance that exposure to more and more lead over time was what caused their generation to become more that way over time. They just assumed it was normal progression because it was happening to almost everyone. Not realizing there was something that could artificially cause that progression.
The kinds of changes in the brain caused by lead exposure do seem to line up with changes that would cause that behaviour. And even the people who stood to benefit financially from leaded gasoline decided it was a bad idea, so their own internal data must have been pretty damning to convince them to make less money.
We can “out think” implicit racism with critical thinking, but we lose that critical thinking ability as a normal part of aging.
Lead exposure fucks with critical thinking too, which compounds with aging.
The good part of that is implicit racism can be offset by just seeing people of other races, even if it’s only on TV. So just watching Family Matters or Sesame St is enough to prevent in groups from forming along racial lines.
So generations that came up watching Urkel are less likely to “become racist” as they age.
Which makes states like Alabama banning Sesame St because it was racially integrated even more nefarious and explains why those states still have higher rates of racism.
If being trans is caused by microplastics, alright. They’re still not hurting anyone. If there is an environmental culprit, then hopefully conservatives would finally acknowledge that there is a biological process at work and it’s not a choice made by deviants or whatever.
I am not a biologist by any stretch of the imagination, but I have definitely read that there is an impact on sex hormone production from microplastics, and that our generation’s sex hormone production has changed (Decreased? I think?) without a solidly defined cause.
I also know that I’m basically sipping on a liquified styrofoam cup every time I drink my tap water.
That said, fuck, if microplastics were the only thing it took to make someone trans, I would be saving a lot on laser hair removal, doctors’ appointments, and E.
Not to mention saving time and misery on voice training.
So if microplastics are turning the friggin frogs gay and turning people trans, that doesn’t make trans people any less valid. If someone has PTSD because of foreign stimulous (a traumatic event) impacting their psyche, that doesn’t mean their PTSD doesn’t count.
If my ‘transness’ is somehow related to microplastics, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t count.
I know that you’re in agreement with me, definitely not directed at you. It’s just an interesting line of discussion, and you seem more interesting to have that conversation with than the person who just blanket blamed transgenderism on microplastics while providing zero context and comparing it to boomer lead poisoning.
When all is said and done, I’d rather be microplastic trans than a lead-induced bigot/mouthbreather.
There are so many quotes that I’ve seen, about how young people are more liberal, and as you get older, people tend to get more conservative.
… I’m an “elder” millennial… like, so early on in the millennial generation that I barely count as a millennial, myself and all my same-aged friends have pretty much been very liberal from a young age and I can confidently say, none of us have changed in this regard, despite all of us reaching 40.
All the shit they say about getting older and changing your mind might be true for some, but on the whole, it’s little more than someone flapping their jaw and making sounds. No basis in reality.
To give an easy example, all of my friends who are similarly aged, who attended college, have long since paid off any student loans we took out for college, even me, who did two diplomas (more than most) and had a difficult time getting into my field and earning a fair wage. Ask any of us about student loan forgiveness and we’re all supportive. Why punish a whole new generation of people just because we had to go through the terrible and broken system, and paid everything off ourselves? Why should they suffer like we did?
More than a few don’t even have children, so it’s not like their kids are going to see a benefit from it. Yet, we support it. Because that’s what we believe in.
I’m in my mid 50s now and I haven’t got more racist… I’ve got angrier that things that were wrong in my youth are still wrong now, angrier at politicians that claim to represent me spouting racist bullshit. But if anything I’m more left wing than I was, and I’m definitely more liberal than I was 10 years ago.
Ask any of us about student loan forgiveness and we’re all supportive. Why punish a whole new generation of people just because we had to go through the terrible and broken system
But this is what loan forgiveness would do. It would punish future generations by driving up prices even more. Loan forgiveness is a one time handout to whoever happens to owe at the time. It’s a “fuck you, I got mine” move
Loan forgiveness is just one example and I didn’t examine the topic in depth on purpose, but bluntly, loan forgiveness without reform in the system isn’t very meaningful, so when I’m referring to loan forgiveness, I’m not strictly just referring to forgiving existing loans; the topic should also include reform to the system to reduce or eliminate student loans for all future generations.
That context was beyond the scope of the original discussion. The fact that this was your take away, is very interesting to me, since it wasn’t really the point of the post.
In any case, I hope you have a good day, and good luck in life.
This is pretty misleading. There was a mix of people good and bad, just like there is now. Plenty of racist and hateful millennials/zoomers as well that lean conservative. Each subsequent generation just likes to pat themselves on the backs and claim they’re better and more enlightened.
Just how old do you think boomers were in the '60s? The generation didn’t start until the baby boom after WWII (hence the name), so the oldest were at most 25 years old at the end of the decade.
The boomers didn’t join the Silent Generation in the role of civil rights reactionaries until the '70s or '80s.
Exactly, which is why the comment I was responding to…
Most boomers spent the 60s beating the shit out of Civil Rights protestors and spitting on children because their schools were desegregated.
…was wrong.
Edit: to be clear, I’m not trying to say the boomers were good people! I’m just saying that the person I replied to had his timeline off because in the '60s, most of the boomers weren’t adults yet.
People just like using “boomer” as a euphemism for “old.” Same type of person as those who have used “millennial” as a euphemism for “young” for the past decade plus.
And boomer seems to be just any white person with grey hair. It’s not even referencing a specific generation. It’s just a catch all for ‘all the old, white people I don’t like who have the right to vote for things’
my father went to highschool in the 50’s in Florida and he straight up said it was a warzone. you HAD to make to ‘Your’ side of the train tracks lest you caught a mob beating or lynching. He was sent to catholic school because he was a beach neck, he still remembers the faces of kids who were taken down to the basement never to return. he now is an Animal Hoarder with severe depression and major social disorders from the violence he endured and witnessed. he is white, blonde hair, blue eyes. and he does not consider surviving a privilege.
The hippie movement was something like 1% of boomers… Maybe as high as 5%, but that’s doubtful
Most boomers spent the 60s beating the shit out of Civil Rights protestors and spitting on children because their schools were desegregated.
It’s just boomers want everyone to think they were cool so they lie about what they were like back then.
And they also lie and tell younger generations that they’ll also get racist, hateful, and stupid as they age. Yets facts don’t back that up.
I think that’s just a Southern thing. Living in the North, my grandparents never discussed beating the shit out of civil rights protesters. Nor did they spout overtly racist things.
They were prejudice, but it was more of a I’ve never seen anyone with that color skin and it’s different so I’m uncomfortable.
I had a very similar experience, didn’t think my family was racist at all until I got engaged. Northerners just hide it.
Northerners just don’t engage if it’s not in their backyard. It’s a lot easier since there is a lower density of POC.
100%. Grew up in the Northeast, never experienced true racism in my family until I met my Arkansas relatives.
Oh wow…
Yeah if they never told their grandkids they were huge pieces of shit, they most not have been. That absolutely proves they were part of the 1% of that generation actually on the right side of history.
It’s not like as a generation they’ve spent 60 years lying about what they were like back then…
The thing about racist relatives is that they DO SPOUT THAT SHIT AT HOME. Where do you think kids hear it first?
There is a good chance that exposure to more and more lead over time was what caused their generation to become more that way over time. They just assumed it was normal progression because it was happening to almost everyone. Not realizing there was something that could artificially cause that progression.
The kinds of changes in the brain caused by lead exposure do seem to line up with changes that would cause that behaviour. And even the people who stood to benefit financially from leaded gasoline decided it was a bad idea, so their own internal data must have been pretty damning to convince them to make less money.
Oh for sure, lead was 100% a factor.
We can “out think” implicit racism with critical thinking, but we lose that critical thinking ability as a normal part of aging.
Lead exposure fucks with critical thinking too, which compounds with aging.
The good part of that is implicit racism can be offset by just seeing people of other races, even if it’s only on TV. So just watching Family Matters or Sesame St is enough to prevent in groups from forming along racial lines.
So generations that came up watching Urkel are less likely to “become racist” as they age.
Which makes states like Alabama banning Sesame St because it was racially integrated even more nefarious and explains why those states still have higher rates of racism.
It makes you wonder if the trans movement is partially due to micro plastics.
I’ll assume you meant that in good faith.
If being trans is caused by microplastics, alright. They’re still not hurting anyone. If there is an environmental culprit, then hopefully conservatives would finally acknowledge that there is a biological process at work and it’s not a choice made by deviants or whatever.
Enby transfemme chiming in real quick:
I am not a biologist by any stretch of the imagination, but I have definitely read that there is an impact on sex hormone production from microplastics, and that our generation’s sex hormone production has changed (Decreased? I think?) without a solidly defined cause.
I also know that I’m basically sipping on a liquified styrofoam cup every time I drink my tap water.
That said, fuck, if microplastics were the only thing it took to make someone trans, I would be saving a lot on laser hair removal, doctors’ appointments, and E.
Not to mention saving time and misery on voice training.
So if microplastics are turning the friggin frogs gay and turning people trans, that doesn’t make trans people any less valid. If someone has PTSD because of foreign stimulous (a traumatic event) impacting their psyche, that doesn’t mean their PTSD doesn’t count.
If my ‘transness’ is somehow related to microplastics, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t count.
I know that you’re in agreement with me, definitely not directed at you. It’s just an interesting line of discussion, and you seem more interesting to have that conversation with than the person who just blanket blamed transgenderism on microplastics while providing zero context and comparing it to boomer lead poisoning.
When all is said and done, I’d rather be microplastic trans than a lead-induced bigot/mouthbreather.
There are so many quotes that I’ve seen, about how young people are more liberal, and as you get older, people tend to get more conservative.
… I’m an “elder” millennial… like, so early on in the millennial generation that I barely count as a millennial, myself and all my same-aged friends have pretty much been very liberal from a young age and I can confidently say, none of us have changed in this regard, despite all of us reaching 40.
All the shit they say about getting older and changing your mind might be true for some, but on the whole, it’s little more than someone flapping their jaw and making sounds. No basis in reality.
To give an easy example, all of my friends who are similarly aged, who attended college, have long since paid off any student loans we took out for college, even me, who did two diplomas (more than most) and had a difficult time getting into my field and earning a fair wage. Ask any of us about student loan forgiveness and we’re all supportive. Why punish a whole new generation of people just because we had to go through the terrible and broken system, and paid everything off ourselves? Why should they suffer like we did?
More than a few don’t even have children, so it’s not like their kids are going to see a benefit from it. Yet, we support it. Because that’s what we believe in.
I’m in my mid 50s now and I haven’t got more racist… I’ve got angrier that things that were wrong in my youth are still wrong now, angrier at politicians that claim to represent me spouting racist bullshit. But if anything I’m more left wing than I was, and I’m definitely more liberal than I was 10 years ago.
But this is what loan forgiveness would do. It would punish future generations by driving up prices even more. Loan forgiveness is a one time handout to whoever happens to owe at the time. It’s a “fuck you, I got mine” move
Loan forgiveness is just one example and I didn’t examine the topic in depth on purpose, but bluntly, loan forgiveness without reform in the system isn’t very meaningful, so when I’m referring to loan forgiveness, I’m not strictly just referring to forgiving existing loans; the topic should also include reform to the system to reduce or eliminate student loans for all future generations.
That context was beyond the scope of the original discussion. The fact that this was your take away, is very interesting to me, since it wasn’t really the point of the post.
In any case, I hope you have a good day, and good luck in life.
Than call it loan reform.
Most boomers did none of those things because most people were just living their lives.
This is pretty misleading. There was a mix of people good and bad, just like there is now. Plenty of racist and hateful millennials/zoomers as well that lean conservative. Each subsequent generation just likes to pat themselves on the backs and claim they’re better and more enlightened.
Just how old do you think boomers were in the '60s? The generation didn’t start until the baby boom after WWII (hence the name), so the oldest were at most 25 years old at the end of the decade.
The boomers didn’t join the Silent Generation in the role of civil rights reactionaries until the '70s or '80s.
The teens and young 20 somethings in the 60s were the counter culture. You know, “don’t trust anyone over 30”. So they were boomers.
Exactly, which is why the comment I was responding to…
…was wrong.
Edit: to be clear, I’m not trying to say the boomers were good people! I’m just saying that the person I replied to had his timeline off because in the '60s, most of the boomers weren’t adults yet.
People just like using “boomer” as a euphemism for “old.” Same type of person as those who have used “millennial” as a euphemism for “young” for the past decade plus.
And boomer seems to be just any white person with grey hair. It’s not even referencing a specific generation. It’s just a catch all for ‘all the old, white people I don’t like who have the right to vote for things’
my father went to highschool in the 50’s in Florida and he straight up said it was a warzone. you HAD to make to ‘Your’ side of the train tracks lest you caught a mob beating or lynching. He was sent to catholic school because he was a beach neck, he still remembers the faces of kids who were taken down to the basement never to return. he now is an Animal Hoarder with severe depression and major social disorders from the violence he endured and witnessed. he is white, blonde hair, blue eyes. and he does not consider surviving a privilege.
I don’t think they get more racist. They hide it less, the fuck it I’m old mentally.
No, they don’t get more racist, but they think that WE will.
They think older = more experience = more knowledgeable. Old people are more racist, therefore racism must be cause by being more knowledgeable.
In Spain we have a “miracle”: the day after Franco died everyone was fighting against Franco the day before. Even the ones in the government.
“Spain went to bed being francoist and woke up ‘lifelong democrats’”.
And this is the same. Everyone was hippy and embraced free live and all that… even if they voted for Nixon and were against ‘mixing races’.