• ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Always amazing to see people who know what they’re talking about getting downvoted all the time. Maybe lemmy really is becoming like that other site.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are no incentives you can use to entice someone under a psychotic break. You really have no idea what the situation is like. These are not people who have adhd or depression or whatever. They literally do not comprehend reality.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, if the issue is a growing homeless population, get them housed and use the housing as an incentive for treatment.

        Housing first works best with homelessness.

        And incentives work better than force for treatment.

        But what do I know from my lived experience being homeless because of poor mental health? Or the human services classes I took after getting on my feet?

        Apparently much less than people’s gut reactions.

        Honestly this bill is more about cleaning up CA homeless problem (and accompanying image) than it is about helping people with mental illness. It ignores best practices, the advice of homeless advocate groups, as well as disability groups.

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And you can say no to treatment by just playing games with a therapist and pretending to do the work.

            Forcing people into mental health care isn’t very effective and we know this. This isn’t about helping the homeless. It’s about CA’s image. Newsom’s image im particular.

      • BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does but… how are you going to screen everyone, are you going to leave it up to police discretion?

        How does that work out most of the time?

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Cool. So if you’re a woman living in a red state that. And your conservative Christian psychiatrist decides you wanting to leave your husband is insane, you’d be cool with being locked up?

            Attitudes like this were common in psychiatry not even 100 years ago. 50 years ago being LGB was considered insane. Today, many states would use your law to lock up trans people until they get better. Even now women struggle with medical care because of Drs with outdated views. And people of color don’t trust Drs generally, but you want to give them more power to imprison people? Do you think that would reduce or improve the stigma of mental illness? Do you think it would encourage people to get help? To trust therapists?