Too narrow, hidden, minimal feedback…

  • deleted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am sick of modern minimalist UI where functionality is not a priority.

    I always prefer win32 applications for this reason.

    • Jesus_666@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Heck, I even prefer the ultra-skeuomorphic textured-everything approach of Mountain Lion-era OS X over the current ultra-minimalist approach where everything is either a hairline or a big flat monocolored shape.

      It actually makes it harder to parse the UI when a button, a text field, a label, and a random part of the window can look exactly the same. I’d rather take a file manager that tries to look like a 1980s hifi stereo.

      Or you know, a reasonable middle ground.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the early '90s Alan Cooper wrote a book called About Face which unfortunately has dropped off the face of the earth as far as its influence on UI design is concerned. One of its many sensible proscriptions was that UI elements that can be interacted with should be visibly distinct from elements that are just there to display information. As a programmer, it drives me insane to have to use any of the modern apps that have completely abandoned this principle - or to have to deal with designers who have literally mocked me for thinking this is important.

        • Jesus_666@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, that is the worst aspect of modern UI design. Interactable elements that are distinguished from labels solely by color because accessibility is so 2010. Labels that have that same color for emphasis. Flat black windows with black borders in front of other flat black windows that will get focus if you accidentally click them.

          Or what the article is about: Tiny, hidden scroll bars because Fitts’s law means nothing and every user has a touchscreen and 20/20 vision.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m all for a return to skeuomorphic design on macOS and iOS. I think it was a nice juxtaposition to the minimalist hardware design.

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That shit started with win2k/winme already. That’s when the borders of controls were made thinner, icons were made with less contrast and the first flat buttons that only show their border on hover were being used. So it’s quite some time already that this is going downhill.

        (tbf, I think the flat buttons were mostly intended for toolbars, but still, style won over function)

    • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fucking ribbon menus can eat my salty ass. Why does everything take up so much God damn real estate on my screen? I’ve got work to do!

      Take Slack, as an example. Anyone gotten the UI update? Christ on a cock, it’s BAD. Hope you use slack full-screen because you’re gonna need that to see the actual chat/conversations area. They added another sidebar now. That’s 3 sidebars stacked up, and only 1 of them is even useful ( channels ) . Who is out there using so many workspaces, that they need a sidebar? Why does a sidebar need a sidebar sidebar?

      Why do all my office and CAD programs take up the entire top 5th of my screen with menus?

      Oh, you wanted to actually read that email? Damn sorry we only gave you less than half the screen to do that on, in outlook. But the sidebars are super important you see!

      • deleted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re correct.

        However, in our capitalist world, form follows profit.