silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 10 months agoCan We Save the Redwoods by Helping Them Move?www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down10cross-posted to: treehuggers@slrpnk.net
arrow-up122arrow-down1external-linkCan We Save the Redwoods by Helping Them Move?www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: treehuggers@slrpnk.net
minus-squareDigital_man@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·10 months agoDidn’t read the article , but moving the trees doesn’t seem to really address the main issue.
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-210 months agoHere’s the thing: we’ve already caused significant warming and resulting damage. We need both adaptation and work to limit further damage. Planting trees further from the equator is one way to help engage in adaptation. I strongly recommend reading articles before commenting or voting; it’s a very helpful way to avoid getting taken in by misinformation.
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·10 months agoSorry, I didn’t bother to read your comment, but I just want to let you know you’re wrong.
Didn’t read the article , but moving the trees doesn’t seem to really address the main issue.
Here’s the thing: we’ve already caused significant warming and resulting damage. We need both adaptation and work to limit further damage.
Planting trees further from the equator is one way to help engage in adaptation.
I strongly recommend reading articles before commenting or voting; it’s a very helpful way to avoid getting taken in by misinformation.
Sorry, I didn’t bother to read your comment, but I just want to let you know you’re wrong.