If you want a couple extra inches in you I believe I can be of service.

Baba Slaga sounds like a banger. In more ways than one.

Based on reading the wikipedia page movement in a submersible was exactly that problem they (successfully) solved with this testing platform.

The full size Enterprise D bridge was amazing.

11 to 13 years? Well this is some bulkshit, I want my money back.

Edit: of course that was supposed to say “bullshit” but I like it better this way.

And some of us have been for over 3 years…

Oh yeah, people pointing out innocuous peculiarities of grammar is my turn on!

I agree with some of what you said but not all of it. So I don’t agree, uh, all the way? One hundred percent? With the totality of your statement? There’s gotta be a better way to say that.

Yeah people on the Internet are too quick to anger, so I’m told.

I don’t believe you because the end of your sentence wasn’t emphatic enough. Period. Mic drop.

Ah yes, illiterate birds. As opposed to birds who can read.

It’s working out really great, I’m actually a lawyer too! My real name is Oliver Wendell Holmes but I try to keep a low profile online.

I didn’t say you were quoting me, I said you reworded my statements. Hey you did it again!

The main reason I doubt you are a lawyer is that you keep rewording my statements so you can make a different argument that sounds better (to you). If you are a lawyer (lol) you should probably go wait for your phone to ring, it’s Trump and you’re up next.

https://i.giphy.com/a6YHwnkn0ctOM.webp

Buddy, absolutely nothing of what I described comes anywhere close to what you just posted. You might be the worst armchair lawyer ever. If what you just posted matched to what I described then her lawyers would also be liable for disbarment hearings, that simply is not how it works.

Buddy, you and I have clearly had wildly different experiences with lawyers, technical nuance, and toeing the line of legal ethics.

1, they don’t need a legally valid justification for the lawsuit they haven’t filed because they’re still at a stage way before that: scary threatening letter.

2, the gap between “I don’t like that people track my plane” and you stating that it’s “very likely” she personally approved the letter is pretty hilarious, and again anyone in her entourage could be the driving force behind this, and the LLC “nuance” still doesn’t matter since this isn’t a legal filing, its a bully letter.

3, “misrepresent facts” can be interpreted in many ways. This is a letter sent to a guy trying to scare him off, there aren’t as many protections as you think on “misrepresenting facts” in a letter versus an actual legal filing. As pointed out in the article they accuse him of the nebulous violating of state laws while notably not saying which ones, believe me if they knew specific laws to list they would love to, makes the letter look MUCH scarier.

4, “no lawyer… is going to bold face lie in a demand letter” well that’s just horseshit man, not to beat a dead horse but its a LETTER, not a legal filing.

5, in conclusion, you should check the batteries in your “Jump to Conclusions” mat.

Sure if she knows about it, so let’s hope A, this blows up enough for someone to ask her about it in an interview, and B she actually gives a shit to do something. I won’t hold my breath.

I have absolutely no problem with this guy posting this information about Tay Tay or anyone else for that matter. Having said that there is a pretty good chance Taylor herself knows fuckall about this even happening: her entourage is almost certainly the driving force behind this. I would certainly like to think if she were actually aware of the details behind what he’s doing/what her lawyers are doing she wouldn’t be coming down on him but who knows?

“ex cop…at his bar” Yep, that rings true.