Hi Firefox. It’s been a while…
Hi Firefox. It’s been a while…
What would be the point of this from a non fucked up standpoint?
I think the bad and good reasons can be true at the same time. Plenty of others list the bad reasons. For the good reasons:
They have also bombed the caravan on primary roadway people are taking out of the city, according to several news sources
Fwiw the video that Hamas themselves released shows an explosion that is very much not a missile or artillery. It has a large orange flameball, doesn’t leave a crater, leaves windows on the vans intact.
This was most likely a propane IED of which Hamas are known to use. Or a tragic accident (trucks propane tank exploding).
Double_A Nerdy men playing a board game are intidimating? How do women even get anything in life done of they are this fragile? WTF? Do you also want separate women-only schools, and women-only companies?
Rbmellor Tf are they in separate groups for? Don’t girls know how sexy they look playing cheers?
System_glitch And the real reason is because women don’t do well against men. They get dominated except for a very small minority. So I orde for women to have more parity, they have women’s chess A biological man competing with them is, statistically, a huge advantage.
Two others I recall have been since been removed
Etc
America was founded by shrill religious fetishists…
The Mandela effect and the Fruit of the Loom logo
I wouldn’t put it past them to short their own stock while they make announcements then go long once things settle down…
People donating aren’t pushing shitification in search of profits though…
It’s got to be something to do with “political” slogans in retail spaces. But how that doesn’t straight up violate the first amendment I don’t know…
Plenty of enlightened gents hitting the thread here to rubbish the need for a women’s category whilst simultaneously demonstrating the need for a women’s category
Well… this is certainly enough bullshit to make the crops grow
Tbf it was actually a lot less stupid than the average “nostupidquestions”
The Catholic church has nearly entirely considered abortion a sin since the first century (yes there are exceptions, but a minority). You are thinking of the adoption of “life begins at conception”, which was ruled in 1869. Prior to that the church considered early abortion an immoral sin on par with contraception. What changed in 1869 was the category from sin of contraception to sin of murder. But it was still “sin” beforehand.
Also 1/3 is 0.333 recurring.
So 1/3 x 3 is 0.999 recurring. But 1/3 x 3 is also 1.
Half of America that didn’t get the love and affection they needed would have voted for some other guy who didn’t get the love and attention he needed.
It’s a systemic issue
Something something Soviet Russia…