Nah. It should be obvious by just looking at it in code. If it isn’t, you haven’t extracted single purpose methods out of it yet.
Nah. It should be obvious by just looking at it in code. If it isn’t, you haven’t extracted single purpose methods out of it yet.
How bad programmers comment their code. Good programmers don’t comment at all and let the code speak for itself, leaving commenting to some obscure and arcane implementation the coder left in after a week long binge on caffeine and gummy bears.
Honestly that’s a small enough difference to not have to worry about too much. What gets me angry is people calling competetive shooters “coop” because they have team gamemodes.
First of all, yeah. In enterprise, 1000 transactions per second can be a requirement. Second, enterprise servers take longer to spool up than 3 minutes.
And yet they need to also be fixing bugs en masse since they create tons of them every update.
Guy, Dark Souls and Demon Souls are considered the “Souls” series despite Demon Souls being an entirely different series. So yeah, it is pedantry. Name it whatever you like, people know what I am talking about when saying “souls”, and that it includes Bloodborne and Elden Ring. Because the gameplay loop is identical.
I won’t be replying to you anymore. I don’t like arguing with people that think like you do
Buddy, it’s a souls game through and through. You can be pedantic about it, but it’s the same thing we have had since Demon Souls.
Okay, the boss now kills you in one hit and you need 30 perfect frame inputs to be able to dodge one combo.
Difficulty needs to take into account the playability of the game. There is difficulty, and there is plain bullshit. Sadly, the Souls series went on and on trying to “make it harder” in fear of people getting bored or something. In reality they ended up with a Malenia style bosses - who literally breaks established series-long rules.
Or just use seamless coop and don’t worry about it too much. It’s funny when a modder can do a better job than an entire gaming company.
Literally says your abilities allow you to do so.
This is the type of shit you want to see, not the public.
The thread is about Muslims practicing religion. He didn’t have to say it, you can infer it from context.
Should you derive satisfaction from either?
It’s still “yay suffering”.
Amazing, discrediting someone for being a “concern troll”. Or maybe I don’t like it when people get hurt and call out people who wish others harm. Because yaknow, I’m not a horrible person.
Facing the consequences of their actions, and a different person going “oh yes let them die en masse I feel so satisfied” is two entirely different things
Way to go with the slippery slope fallacy huh, buddy. First of all - you shouldn’t feel satisfaction when someone gets hurt. No matter if they are speeding, if they were overeating or if they smoked.
Let’s also not call this “any emotion”. This is “feeling satisfaction because of others surffering”.
Ah yes, the “small tiny tiny satisfaction” and the other side is “wanting to kill everybody”. Don’t you see how hypocritical this is? It’s literally tribalism to the max, excusing “your own” side and making a fuss about “the others”.
Yeah, hence me mentioning the arcane code nobody knows what it does.