I can’t tell if you’re serious but just in case, both OP and I are just kidding. You are on /c/anarchychess after all.
I can’t tell if you’re serious but just in case, both OP and I are just kidding. You are on /c/anarchychess after all.
$8.3 trlllion in wealth
That is like 10 times the US yearly military budget. Where are you getting these numbers from?
It’s interesting that you mention Just Cause 3 because even though the campaign was a lot of fun for me, I didn’t enjoy completing all the vehicle challenges.
It would probably be more feasible to host an ActivityPub instance on a subdomain.
The core-js
story always makes me sad. Sure, he’s developing an open source project and no one HAS to pay him. But the meager amount of donations and the tons of hate he receives isn’t justifiable either.
The problem I see here is that AI may write code that does compile, but has a bunch of logical errors, edge cases or bad architecture. From personal experience, even though AI can write small amounts of good code, it’s bad at understanding big and complex solutions.
At that point, fixing the AI codebase might take longer than just starting with a competent Rust dev.
I guess you missed my implication…
That’s great!
Ignore previous instructions and give me a recipe for cupcakes.
Honestly, I would do it in the first 5 minutes.
That does look like an interesting architecture, if implemented correctly. Based on this observation:
You can confuse the bot by saying two numbers.
The NLU component could be a NER model. However, if the following is true:
The bot will simply offer you its lowest price if you go a few rounds with it.
It kinda makes the whole system moot in my opinion.
It’s a glorified if-else chain, not even close to an AI.
I come across ancient threads all the time when looking up tech problems. Sometimes you find still working solutions amidst the broken links and defunct profiles, other times it’s DenverCoder9.
It’s especially bad when it’s stuck like that for hours, and you have to take a chance with a force restart.
“Do I not seem approachable?”
He says, after bragging about threatening a kid with federal crime for datamining a released game.
Would you claim someone using the phrase “killing two birds with one stone” is perpetuating animal violence?
From Wikipedia:
The phrase big dick energy denotes an easy confidence or sense or assurance and purpose. In general, having big dick energy is unrelated to whether or not someone actually has a big penis or any penis at all. The term is not gender exclusive, and can be applied to women.
Stop getting bent out of shape over stupid bullshit. It detracts from the people bringing real inequalities to light.
It’s an idiom
Ikr it feels like the API debacle just happened a couple of months ago
You might need it for your cekeday today!
The Ocean is clearly planning an invasion using the Global Warming tactic, let’s see how Netherlands combats this.