• 0 Posts
  • 106 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m early Gen Z with a kinda poor family. So I had CRT’s and old VHS but also grew up on the internet.

    I feel an extreme gap between me and people a few years younger. I graduated in 2018 so I was some of the last people to have a traditional highschool experience. Before Covid, Zoom, and Chatgpt.

    I also mostly grew up with computers instead of phones so Im only just now getting into TikTok, I’ll likely never truly revolve around it like many others (both older and younger than me).






  • Oh it gets worse with Shadiversity. Huge AI art guy, his brother’s an actual artist too so it’s hard seeing Shad brag to him. Very “anti-woke” and paints his conservative Mormon beliefs on everything.

    The worst unforgivable part is the end of his book has impregnated rape victims step up to defend the rapist protagonist because he “gave them” a child, while the ones that didn’t get pregnant were jealous.

    He loves to bring up that the book is supposed to explore this immoral character. But this isn’t the protagonist’s viewpoint this is just how Shad thinks the world works. This is how Shad believes rape victims think.

    Very sad to see, I followed him for swords and castles but Jesus Christ.






  • I imagine it’s because the attributes that IQ measure could be the same as we use to measure success.

    Effectively if your test is based on the skills needed for STEM, and the STEM fields have jobs with high pay and respect, then you’re likely to be considered “successful”. But the same person could be awful at communication, politics, the arts, and just be ignorant at large to how the world works. They may even be hyper specialized to their field but lack the flexibility in their intelligence to understand other STEM fields (I hear physicists are guilty of this).

    Another, simpler answer, could just be that already wealthy people have better access to stable education, so they were already successful in many ways.


  • I feel like the current Machine Learning gold rush is amazing from a technical perspective, but I feel like a lot of technophiles miss the real potential.

    What we have is the first crickety engines of this technology. We’re not building futurism masterpieces with the equivalent to a steam engine.

    We have great new tools that we can use to further understand and optimize what we built, instead of just throwing more and more compute on top of our first design.

    The human brain uses a light bulb of power, so we know we are massively inefficient. And recent research like MAMBA shows that there’s still more improvements to make.

    And Anthropic’s Mech Interp shows there’s ways to better understand the neural networks to improve performance without relying solely on a “black box”.

    The tech has great potential, but the massive server farms being dedicated to it now is just crypto style overhype and fear of missing out.