I found Kreia’s “nuance” tedious. I help someone and she’s all “but if you force them to help themselves they’ll be stronger”. Shut up space Ayn Rand
I found Kreia’s “nuance” tedious. I help someone and she’s all “but if you force them to help themselves they’ll be stronger”. Shut up space Ayn Rand
FTFY
100%. You are not the problem, the problem is the government and its corporate controllers who decided to just let it run rampant.
No, by our current understanding there is no length smaller than a Planck length, and any distance must therefore be divisible by an integer. That is, the length is made up of discrete quanta. Pi, or any other irrational number, is by definition not divisible by an integer, or it would be a ratio, making it rational. This has nothing to do with the accuracy or precision of our measures.
Plus, if you have two people with legit access, you can pretty easily figure out what’s going on and defeat it.
My only guess as to what this could mean is that since quantum mechanics is quantum, i.e. discrete, the universe therefore cannot be continuous as the reals are. But this is a category error. Just because you could never find an object that is, say, exactly pi meters long, does not mean that the definition of pi is threatened. There’s nothing infinite that we can observe, but infinity is still a useful concept. And it works both ways; just because quantum mechanics is our best model of the universe doesn’t mean the universe is therefore quantum. 150 years ago everyone believed the universe was like a big clockwork mechanism, perfectly deterministic, because Newtonian physics are deterministic. And who knows, maybe they were right, and we just don’t have the framework to understand it so we have a nondeterministic approximation!
So because quantum mechanics is well modeled by imaginary numbers, the existence of quantum particles threatens the definition of irrational numbers? That doesn’t make any sense.
Cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool
Not all heroes wear capes
My man did both though
The other constant is C
IMO, the admission is different but perhaps worse. What he’s saying is that the US and its allies should be immune to the ICC in all cases.
This has placed the prime minister in a political vise. If he commits to postwar Palestinian rule in Gaza and begins acting seriously to establish it, he loses the far right. But if he commits to resettling Gaza, he loses the Israeli majority and the international community. And so, as he has often done in the past, Netanyahu has chosen not to choose
Oh, he’s chosen.
The cool thing is that even if the penalty isn’t a fine, there’s a good chance you can plea bargain your way back down to a fine
At risk of sounding cringe, it’s evidence of one injustice system.
Most climate scientists aren’t keen on geoengineering. Things aren’t bad enough we need to do this yet.
IMO we invented it, because numbers don’t real. But that’s a deeper philosophical question.
I truly have no idea what you’re saying.
Keto-mojo asked for their address and phone number, so they said they were homeless and lost their phone, and it worked