Is it really a threat to muse about what could happen as some random person on the internet?
It’s not like OP announced to do it or called for it to be done.
I’d see it differently if a person with a lot of followers (especially crazy ones) would dare to think something like this aloud. Does this law cover former presidents as well?

Anyway… Remember: it’s a losing battle trying to be tolerant of the intolerant!

What if their authority recognizes you?

Does it count as a concept of a plan?

I wonder - and I mean this seriouslyand not in an /s way - what happens, if you object “bOth SiDeS” with “Why not vote for Harris then?”?
Surely you won’t convince a Trumpologist this way.
But doesn’t that also give leeway to present voting for Harris as equally good choice in the eyes of Trumpologists?

Unexpected Keyboard
https://github.com/Julow/Unexpected-Keyboard
Available on F-Droid
You can pretty much configure the whole layout. Not sure about gif support though.

Do you know the old saying:
if privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy.

Just because people might do stuff with things that isn’t intended or even illegal doesn’t mean you should be banning said things.
Otherwise we’d be in a world where we have no kitchen knives, axes, wrenches, food, money, cars, planes, ships, bikes, hands, feet - you know what I mean?

See? Now it makes sense! Or not…
Seriously, your translation was very helpful. I understood most, of that message, but the vacations made no sense and were a bit too far off from what was meant to be said.

And the aquaeducts!

I understand they are what’s killing us 🤷‍♂

Thanks for following that up!
At least the total coal energy use did stay almost the same due to the reduced share of it.
It’s not the win one could’ve hoped for, but it’s not horrible either.

Can you please link sources?
I’m interested in the total TWh of electric energy generated (now and then), because they may very well release more CO2 in total at 55% now compared to 70% 10 years ago.