Sixth0795@sh.itjust.works to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoHuhsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageHuhsh.itjust.worksSixth0795@sh.itjust.works to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareEarMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoI am wondering why it adds up to exactly 100%. There has to be some creative data handling happened with these numbers.
minus-squareMeatPilot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-25 months agoMaybe the article/stats were generated using another LLM?
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-25 months agoPeople like you are why Mt. Everest had two feet added to its actual height so as to not seem too perfect.
minus-squareEarMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoNo I’m not. Why would I use feet to measure a mountain’s height?
I am wondering why it adds up to exactly 100%. There has to be some creative data handling happened with these numbers.
Maybe the article/stats were generated using another LLM?
People like you are why Mt. Everest had two feet added to its actual height so as to not seem too perfect.
No I’m not. Why would I use feet to measure a mountain’s height?