So I bought 2 sets because it looked like one set was briefly lost in the mail and this past week I got an email from Amazon that said one set I bought were “fakes.”

  • Both sets have printing that matches legitimate manufactures.
  • The “legitimate” set have all black filters (not the metalized filters I am used to like Thousand Oaks Optical) the “fakes” have the metalized filters.
  • Both sets of glasses have the same transmittance as the Thousand Oaks filter material I use on my telescope and cameras.
  • The build quality of the “legitimate” glasses is quite a bit worse than the “fakes” with the two layers of paper being misaligned

So, what I suspect is that I actually received a crappy set of “real” glasses and a well made set of counterfeits, this seems in line with the press release made by the American Astronomical Scociety.[0]

Some of these newly identified counterfeits are indistinguishable from genuine Qiwei products and appear to be safe. Others look like Qiwei’s eclipse glasses, but when you put them on, you realize they are no darker than ordinary sunglasses. So, these products are not just counterfeit, but also fake –– they’re sold as eclipse glasses, but they are not safe for solar viewing.

So, did anyone get unlucky enough to get some ‘real-fake’ glasses? An did anyone get a set of legitimate glasses with the non-metalized filter?

[0] https://aas.org/press/american-astronomical-society-warns-counterfeit-fake-eclipse-glasses

  • Gamma@beehaw.orgEnglish
    0·
    7 months ago

    Pretty much every gas station I’ve been to the past week had a box of glasses

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      0·
      7 months ago

      In case this is not sarcasm: Do not use selfmade glasses to observe the eclipse. It will temporarily or even permanently blind you.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.caOP
      0·
      7 months ago

      You can use a pinhole to project an image of the sun onto a sheet of paper but not directly as glasses. Look up a ‘pinhole projector’ you can make a pretty good one with an Amazon box.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    7 months ago

    I buy a lot of my telescope equipment from Celestron so I got their kit. It was like $2 more than the knockoff brands but I like my eyeballs so went with a company I trust with relatively inexpensive optics.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
    0·
    7 months ago

    I am near the totality line, but stressing over this problem resulted in me giving up planning to see it.

    Seeing the eclipse directly would be cool, sure, but it will certainly be photographed extensively. I feel like permanently damaging my vision is way too likely buying something off of Amazon, and I don’t have a clue where else I can find them.

    • ArtieShaw@fedia.io
      0·
      7 months ago

      If you can get to an area where it will be in totality, you can see it without eye protection during that brief 2-3 minute window. The danger to your eyes is when it’s at anything less than full total eclipse.

      Workaround: You can see the eclipse with a low tech solution of a pinhole camera. Google it for a better explanation, but

      -poke a pin through a sheet of paper. -during the eclipse, just hold it over something like another sheet of paper and you can see an accurate projection of the sun as the eclipse progresses

      It’s actually pretty neat.

      But if your weather is good, consider going to a place where the eclipse will be total. I’m in the path, but I’m seriously considering driving several hours to a place with a better weather forecast. I’ve seen good quality photo and video of total eclipses since I was a child. And the people who showed it to me (astronomy nerds from a club) told me “it’s not the same.”