What’s your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Calling Hedy Lamarr “the Mother of Wifi” because she invented FHSS is like calling E. A. Johnson, who invented the first capacitive touchscreen in 1965, “the Father of the iPhone”.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      i’m pretty comfortable with calling him that. capacitive touchscreens are a big deal sounds like he deserves the praise.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Capacitive touchscreens are a big deal but it kind of minimizes the work of the other technology that goes into a smartphone, like wireless internet, low power mobile CPUs capable of 3D graphics, lithium-ion battery packs, etc., to say nothing of the design engineers that worked on the exterior, the hardware, and the operating system and deserve credit for the iPhone way more than he does. Crediting the holder of a patent from over 40 years before the iPhone hit the market with the creation of the iPhone is stretching the truth at best.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          children generally are able to have multiple parents.

          if i give credit to Alice for being Bobby’s mother, i’m not minimizing the parenthood of any of Bobby’s other parents. just giving credit where due.

          i would not hesitate to give a couple dozen people the title of father/mother/parent of the iPhone. seems quite appropriate and fair.

      • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Shout out also to John Underkoffler who was the technical advisor on Minority Report (and later Iron Man). The gesture controls in that movie heavily inspired the first smartphones.

          • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            He did a TED talk in 2010 and there are several articles about him. Not much news in recent years, I guess he wasn’t very succesful in turning his motion control concept into a viable product. I interviewed him about eight years ago.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Capacitive touchscreens are the essential technology not just in the iPhone but in all smartphones. Without them we’d still be using flip phones and BlackBerry chiclet keyboards. I think it’s fair to call Johnson the father of the smartphone!

          • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            And touch screens were in devices other than smart phones before smart phones came along.

            So again, father of the touchscreen, sure. But he did not make smartphones happen. He has nothing to do with 99% of the technology in smartphones.

            • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              He invented the capacitive touch screen. The resistive touch screen was in many devices long before smart phones (bank machines being a common example). The resistive touch screen was fine for those applications but it was useless for the smart phone (too slow to respond). The capacitive touch screen’s first killer app was the smartphone, namely the iPhone.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sure, but the touchscreen is arguably the thing that defines a smartphone. It is the part you interact with and the only part the user really sees.

              We had phones before capable of surfing the web and taking and editing pictures. Like Blackberry. But those aren’t really seen as smartphones, more like slightly smarter dumbphones.