Insufficiently ruinous Eco terrorism
Soon
If you ever want to feel disgusted head over to Google Earth and check out Midland, Texas. Every square you see is an oil pad.
Where is Captain Planet when we need him?
Do we not run on gas? I know we’re transitioning, especially China https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024/trends-in-electric-cars
It’s way more than cars. Plastics, chemicals, energy, shipping, fertilizers, pesticides, even food additives can trace their ingredients to oil and gas. We’ve structured our whole society around oil since World War I, and getting out of it isn’t going to be easy.
Chinese power generation has produced more CO2 this year than ever before. They’re also bringing renewables online, but electricity usage has risen too. So we’re closer to turning the corner, but haven’t done so yet.
We’re still using fossil fuels, and not phasing out as fast as possible.
Doing it as fast as possible would crash the world economy because everything is setup up for oil. So it seems obvious what needs to happen, it’s a different story when you personally are now homeless and you just want a roof and food. We can do a lot better than we are though
The alternative, parts of the world will be uninhabitable. Always gotta think about the economy… no matter how many people this is going to kill, or how much biodiversity we lose along the way.
Is there any point of loss where we will say the economy isn’t important anymore, or do we have to be experiencing the loss already?
The problem is crashing the economy will kill a lot of people right now, no need to wait or come up with a better solution
… money
They don’t need to invest in new production any more, so that capital investment money is now pure profit.
Sadly, they are in fact investing in new production.
All must be sacrificed to the parasite class’s cult of Big Number Always Goes Up.
Because many consumer goods are made out of plastic derived from petroleum feed stock? Because it’s still more energy-dense than other forms of energy? Because ICE cars still have more range and affordability than electric? Because the power-grid reliability is not easy to have faith in? Because people are still being born?
…or maybe massive lobbying, subsidies, corruption and fear mongering? No, that can’t be it. A trillion dollar industry would never do unethical things to cling to their power.
Because you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time … and they’ve been at it for a very long time.
Andres Malm suggests in his book “Fossil Capital” that part of the reason that fossil fuels (stocks of energy) are so profitable is that you can pick and choose when to extract and then again when to release the energy stored in them, which will always be more profitable than, for instance, wind and solar (flows of energy) because you can manipulate production to prevent over supply, and choose when to release energy instead of waiting for the energy to be available in the flow. The higher capability to profit means that they will remain more profitable than renewables long after any other sort of calculation other than “profitability” would favor the renewables (cost to produce, damage to the environment, ability to satisfy energy demand).
I blame the young earth creationist christians who think that humans are incapable of destroying gods creation, and that the increasing planetary instability means that god will return and put them in charge any day now.
