• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It absolutely is tho. Usually more precise, 1:1 translatable into written text, can use the superior 24h system and uses the same reading system that is already taught in school anyways.

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I was ready to hate it but after a good look, it doesn’t look that bad. Doesn’t work for small wristwatches but could look nice for a big wall clock.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right! Just to prove a point, I am going to make an NTP enabled rolex, and sync it to my microsecond accurate local NTP server! :P

        • Incandemon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          To be fair, I did have a watch that automatically synced itself to the us naval observatories atomic clocks over the air.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, but you need to factor in the distance to the transmitter. Going to add at least a few microseconds to your time accuracy!

              • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                The watches/clocks they are talking about listened to WWV, a set of radio stations transmitting from Fort Collins, Colorado. The system long predates the Network Time Protocol you’re referring to. Radio controlled clocks/watches had no means for accounting for latency.

              • r00ty@kbin.life
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sync process? The other comment was talking about the old receivers for the atomic clocks on SW/MW frequencies. It was a one way thing.

                Now in theory if a receiver also had GPS they could account for the distance. But, then they’d get far more accurate time from the GPS receiver so…

      • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Ususally more precise” > This depends on how precisely it is set, not on the display. Unless it’s a connected watch, but then it’s much more expensive and less energy efficient.

        “1.1 translatable into written text” > Both are, you’re reading the same number

        “Uses the superior 24h system” > Adding 12 to a number isn’t complicated. And with habit, most people who use analog watches and the 24h system know which position of the needle means what number in 24h format without doing the math. Some clocks don’t even have digits. Unless you’ve been sedated and woke up in a room without windows, you’ll know which side of 12 you’re on. And otherwise, you’ve got more pressing issues.

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wristwatches are just jewelry at this point tbh. They’ve been rendered completely redundant by cell phones. The only people under 60 who wear them are doing so as a fashion statement.

      I’m sure a lot of wristwatch stans will downvote me but I don’t care I’m still right

      • variants@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Watches are just more convenient. You don’t need to carry a phone everywhere and with texts and calls showing on the watch you don’t need to find your phone to check.

        I use my watch with alarms/ timers to know when I need to clock out or in from lunch etc while I mostly leave my phone at my desk while at work so if I’m walking around the building I still get my alerts through my watch

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Watches that can get alerts can show digital time. So, chalk another point up for not learning analog time.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ever since college I’ve always worn a cheap watch on my wrist least for the same reason my grandpa stopped keeping a pocket watch: its more convenient to check on your wrist for the time than your pocket.

        Granted we’re getting way off topic here since except for a few years its ways been a digital watch. Asserting analog watches are more numerous in models when digital watches are more numerous in sales, therefore reading an analog clock is a useful skill is odd to me. When I was wearing an analog watch for my allergies it was a flieger because the mental tax of making the hands turn into a singular time was a frustration.

        I learned, though, from this that how you present time changes how you perceive time. Kids who grow up with digital representations of time consider “the current moment” in a much narrower and instantaneous scope than people who grew up thinking of time as being a spectrum on a dial

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        For office attire or going out, sure.

        If you’re doing repair work, running lines, etc, a watch is the choice. Your hands are busy, so a watch is what you need (Except for specific trades where you don’t want to risk it getting caught in machinery).

        I can say with 100% certainty that I know large swaths of folks in their 20’s and 30’s who regularly wear watches. Some smart, some digital, some analog.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use my wristwatch all the time to take dogs’ pulses.

        Having a cell phone next to a grumpy dog is asking for a broken cell phone. I’m sure people in other fields need wristwatches as well.

        Just because you don’t use them don’t mean they’re not useful.

      • Faresh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I used to have one, but now I set my phone clock to be displayed as an analogue clock so that kind of made it obsolete, since it now has all the benefits of an analogue display with the additional advantage of automatically syncing time and adjusting for time zones and daylight saving time.

        • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yes so do I. And how many of our friends/colleagues wear an analog wrist watch daily to check the time?

          My dad and my father in law are probably the only two people i know who regularly wear them.