• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Someone should saw off the legs of the techbros that came up with the idea of removing the headphone jacks from phones. Just like the headphone jacks, legs are technologically “superseeded” by cars and electronic wheelchairs.

    • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wouldn’t mind if they replaced TRRS with a better connector. I get that the jack is a large part and it’s difficult to seal against water ingress. The wiper contacts on it are also unreliable, and the plug doesn’t release well when your cord snags.

      Multiplexing headphones with my one and only charging port is absolutely the worst possible answer.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        (Did i forget to mention that I want it to be an open connector? One that any vendor can make without Apple’s permission?)

        Apple ditched Lightning last year. All iPhones from the 15 forward are USB-C.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Most people don’t care, don’t use it and it saves cost and thickness. I think they are smarter than you on this.

      You are not their target audience, they know there’s not enough of you for it to make a difference.

      • Eiri@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It saves an amount of money so minuscule it literally makes no difference.

        As for thickness, the iPhone 15 is 7.8 mm thick. You cannot in good faith believe that a 3.5 mm headphone jack can’t fit in it.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Wouldn’t they have to sacrifice like three* minutes of battery life or something though? Everything packed sooo tightly.

          *or 10 or 30, somebody here probably can make a really good educated guess

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve literally never used the headphone jack on a phone in 10 years.
      And I wonder how many would still want it back if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.

      • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are many phones with a headphone jack that have an IP68 rating which invalidates your whole point. If the headphone jack was so compromising then Apple would have needed to remove the charging port as well.

        • InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          A sick and twisted part of me wants to see charging ports removed too. Every port! Make it IP69+ compliant. Maybe then the careless kids I know might keep a device alive for more than a year. Ultimately all that would do is barely solve one problem and introduce a whole lot of other problems.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          many phones with a headphone jack that have an IP68 rating which invalidates your whole point

          Typing on one right now.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        About 10 years ago I used headphones daily, now I do so just frequently enough that it’s irritating to realize I need to purchase a dongle just to do so and go “well I guess I’m not listening to music/podcasts right now”

        What I learned when working for a phone manufacturer is that the headphone jack usage varies by product segment. Cheaper phone users use the headphone jack far more frequently than premium phone users, so they’d keep it on the budget models but drop it on the higher end models. They also did similar with NFC and wireless charging which was interesting…

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Most people don’t use them and never did, all the people downvoting are just salty because they’re not the target audience.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nope.

              if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.

              This is not subjective, it’s objectively false.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  So we agree, you were wrong about it “all being subjective opinion.”

                  • refalo@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    No, something being objective or not is still someone’s opinion ultimately. And there’s still no right or wrong. There’s subjective and objective, though.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Phones became waterproof before removing headphone jacks became a trend. You’re talking nonsense.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve literally never used the headphone jack on a phone in 10 years

        We understood that as soon as you said “literally”.

        I’ve not used on*star, a fire extinguisher or a #2 pencil in a while either, but I bet they’re important. Beware false consensus.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Meh, I haven’t really missed it as much as I expected. The one and only (pretty minor in my case) issue I’ve run into is not being able to charge the phone while connected to the car’s stereo. Though it wouldn’t surprise me if you could just use a usb-c splitter to do that.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        And then you can sell USB-C -> Jack converters (which break after a while - I’ve dismantled one for recycling for my Raspberry Pi, later I might make one epoxy potted for my phone), easy to lose wireless earbuds, etc.

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If the fucking usb c audio was at least consistent, but no, the dongles are different and the phones are different, good luck trying to not blow up ypur phone by buying the wrong accessory (I blame the spec, not that I’ve read it)

      • Alex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They did it to improve water resistance and to sell the more expensive wireless earpods.

        • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          which don’t really matter unless the difference allows your phones to survive a full cycle in a washing machine. So far many phones which removed the headphone jack still does not.