How the hell did the character get so viral? I’ve tried watching the skits several times to see if maybe I’m missing something, but for the life of me, I can’t seem to see it. Is everyone just biased because it’s Tom Hanks? Or is it actually hilarious, and I’m just struggling to understand the humor? Fall/Spooky season is my absolute favorite time of year, but am I just a buzz kill?
Everything Tom Hanks does is gold
Everybody knows him as Tom Hanks, but what people don’t know is his real name is actually Hank Toms!
Otm Shank
Tim Honks
The skit where he is a creepy animatronic robot on the love ride is fantastic.
I’m so glad I never have any idea what is viral on the internet
Is this why I am out of the loop? Is this a thing of American culture, or is it internet culture? Or both?
In any case, I watched the video, found it funny. Harmless absurdity is fun.
Both absurdity and repetition can be funny and the sketch has both in uncomfortable number.
I find it a bit grating, but I think that’s the point. And the sketch writers were clearly aware there was something (deliberately?) off about the whole thing which is why they make overt with DSP’s catchphrase.
My wife and I watched it when it aired, and we found it hilarious. It’s the absurdity of it. Should I know who this guy is?
“Any questions?” “Yes! Several! I mean, he has a middle initial now?”
Very little of SNL is actually funny. Celebrity jeopardy comes to mind
The thing about it is to remember that it’s generally one of 5 skits they have had to write and rehearse as much as possible in the course of 6 days at most.
SNL is more about having a good reason to workshop their skills than it is about how good the show is. But in the context of what they are actually accomplishing, it’s generally a pretty good live show. But of course, it will never be as funny on average as a pre-written and pre-recorded show that can be edited and fixed up.
Sort of the same thing as going to any live theater shows. They are not as good as recorded and edited stuff, but you have to appreciate the effort given the context. And adjust your expectations of the quality of the results. They might occasionally still make something that happens to compete favourably with other media, but it shouldn’t be expected.
As a Brit, I have to agree. So many of the skits that have been shared over the years are terrible, and I have to wonder if it’s a cultural divide.
On the other hand, the weekend update where the guys swap jokes is some of the best comedy I’ve seen.
SNL is very much a combination of both humor from two years ago and next years mainstream. So many of the skits are built in the gap of “what have I seen lately that’s funny so I can quickly write” and “this will be twice as hilarious in a few years.”
So, SNL is usually pretty meh because you either like current humor and the ‘future’ stuff doesn’t hit or you don’t like current humor and that doesn’t hit.
It’s funny because it’s bigger than a normal hat
Turd Ferguson is a funny name.
Didn’t know what this was so looked up the video
That went viral?
It’s about as funny as most SNL, which is pretty much not at all. You’d think they’d get teleprompters that were a little closer to the camera at some point so it wasn’t so fucking obvious that someone can’t remember a line like “Any questions”.
Let’s see you do better.
They don’t use prompters but paper cards and their reasoning is that the script changes up until the last minute but that doesn’t make any sense as it’s easier to update text on a computer than to rewrite a bunch of cards.
They are superstitiously stuck in their ways at SNL, now Lorne says he’s not going to retire so I don’t expect it to get any better.
Jesus Christ it’s actually hilarious 🤣
Thank you.
Sometimes humor is hard to explain. This sketch probably struck some chord with a fad for “random” things at the time, and maybe hasn’t aged very well.
While the internet was of course influential in 2016, my recollection is that people weren’t nearly as jaded and cynical as they are now in the post-truth, post-pandemic world.
We’re constantly bombarded with memes, jokes, and other distractions…so perhaps people are not so easily amused now as they were almost a decade ago.
However, I do remember some folks being confused, annoyed, and unimpressed with it back then, too. But enough people were tickled by it to want to share it with everyone. And I do think Hanks brings a certain bizarre charm to it that not many comedians can pull off.
2016 is well after 9/11/2001… People where already very I jaded on the Internet.
I suspect you where just too young to be jaded yourself yet.
I’m going to say because it’s short, stupid catchy. Sometimes your brain goes to random places and then logic sets in. Ignoring typical reason is what makes absurdist comedy work. We obviously have a character playing it straight trying to figure it out getting more and more upset by the illogical which makes the bit work. The music is silly and not eerie at all and then getting scared freeze frame when they continue to point out the character is not scary is the kicker and sort of makes it worth it. This was probably just a random skit they threw in last minute and thought, just have fun. A lot of hit songs are simple, obvious, stupid and catchy. Rick James thought Superfreak was a throw away song too dumb to be on the album and it’s his most recognized song.
It’s because it’s absolutely absurd and has nothing to do with Halloween. You have seen the whole skit and not just the memes, right? It’s basically a parody of Disney’s Tower of Terror ride but instead of spooky Halloween stuff, they got this dude just dancing around.
I’ve never even heard of it but now I’m intrigued.
It’s not funny. We hate this in my house. We all groan audibly when they do it, and turn SNL off.
I personally really enjoy how David and the skeletons either can’t out won’t elaborate on the parts of their whole thing that the people are confused about. There’s just something funny to me about how it doesn’t seem like they’re intentionally being obtuse. They’ll gladly answer the vague question of “and the skeletons are…?” with the equally vague “part of it!” with a big smile, as though it was a perfectly fine and helpful answer.
I don’t find it particularly funny, but I certainly enjoyed the vibe of the entire skit.
It’s a well-constructed skit – unabashedly silly, with just the right amount of ironic detachment. I love how after Pumpkins shows up, the couple just coolly analyzes the regular monsters that were making them scream moments before. The music is ridiculous, Tom Hanks demeanor is ridiculous, the dancing is ridiculous (with a dash of sexual weirness at the end). And it comes full circle with him genuinely scaring them in the end.
I do think that them doing sequels and trying to spin a mini-franchise out of it was stupid though.
It feels so real in how disappointing the experience becomes for the straight characters. That would be my reaction if I went into that thing to be frightened, and I get David S. Pumpkins instead. By the way, you’re not alone as I read years ago that Tom Hanks doesn’t get it either.
It feels so real in how disappointing the experience becomes for the straight characters.
This hits the nail on the head. It’s funny because of the point of view of the actual participants.
The funny thing about this thread is that there are so many comments essentially agreeing with the central premise of the sketch, that it’s relatable and disorienting when you stumble onto some kind of established fandom and can’t seem to keep up with why it’s popular or what is or isn’t “part of it.” The popularity is confusing in itself, and the need to dissect the lore (as OP is doing, perhaps even unintentionally following the sketch itself) distracts from the original purpose of going there to be entertained.
In other words, the sketch is funny and relatable exactly for the same reasons why much of the audience doesn’t find it funny and relatable.
This is a perfect analysis that was thoroughly ruined by not ending it with:
aNy qUeStIoNs?!?
