• Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I remembered a scene of a black mirror episode: if the person looked away the ads will stop until the person watch it again and it’s unavoidable … I wonder if this will be a reality one day

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yes, the technology to do this is here, and they’re just waiting for the consumer to be able to put up with it.

      • Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Reading your reply made me think … it’s possible that implying such technology might help rising Free & Open Source culture more … given that FOSS apps are usually ad-free and with no tracking

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Honestly the best thing about FOSS is that money isn’t driving all the decisions. Most open-source projects are built because the dev just wants to build something cool or useful, or they’re trying to solve specific problems. Most individual devs don’t really care if their user count goes up every quarter.
          Personally I’ve been maintaining a chrome extension for about 10 years, and it’s sat happily with about 7000 users that entire time. I built it because I wanted to use it, and I’ve declined several offers to buy the extension and monetize it.

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              It’s an extension that makes GitHub pages full width: https://github.com/xthexder/wide-github/

              Admittedly the usefulness has gone down a little bit in the last couple years now that GitHub themselves have made code diffs and some other things full width by default.

              When I first wrote this I had just gotten a giant 4K display at work and was really annoyed I still had to scroll left and right with the page only covering 1/3 of the screen.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        This is why I just set up a media server at home.

        It’s mine, you can’t pump it full of ads. All the media is mine and those companies can go fuck themselves.

        Sail those seas folks

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can’t disable the camera without losing functionality then people won’t buy the product.

        If they try to push it by making a gentleman’s agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          I mean the concept is pretty simple, all they have to do is make whatever the content it is not play without the verification.

          Now I do have to say, it does come down to what is the system we do want? We can agree we don’t want intrusive ads. We can say that the paid for services are too expensive. But at the end of the day when we refuse to pay for the content, and then bypass the ads, we do leave content creation in a rough spot. We’ve kind of reached a point where we need a new system. Yet all we seem to do is try and find ways to break the existing one.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Basically me every time I open a website on my work laptop, where I cannot add browser extensions because of IT policies.

      I honestly cannot fathom why large companies don’t include at least simple adblockers in their browser configurations. I don’t even need to block youtube ads, the banners on stackoverflow are bass enough). Would probably save fairly significant amounts of bandwidth, too.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I’m to the point that if whatever I’m watching/doing pops an ad at me, I reflexively make a snap judgement on whether I want to continue watching/doing whatever it is. Often the answer is ‘no’ and I’ll just bail entirely.

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    After going nuclear against ad blockers, at some point google is going to introduce a new “feature” where YouTube uses AI with your phone’s camera to automatically pause videos when you look away from your phone.

    Then they’ll make it so you have to buy a subscription to turn it off during ads.

      • Maeve@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Tbh I figured they have bots crawling social media to find out what people are using to avoid their annoying, intrusive, abusive practices and use that to get ever more obnoxious.

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Me if that happens:

      jk, i barely use YT as it is. I’m waiting for the YT ToS update that causes a mass migration to peertube

    • hactar42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      So I have a conspiracy theory around that. Android used to put the volume slider at the top of the screen. At some point they moved it to the right side, and now blocks the skip button on YouTube. I won’t doubt this was done on purpose, so if you lower the volume for an ad, you will be forced to watch more of it.

  • Pissnpink@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    If you click the ad does the company have to pay like a fraction of a cent or something for a click through? Like if I always click on the ads can I make them pay for having waisted my time if it’s only a little bit?

    • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      That’s the idea behind the AdNauseum browser extension. “Click” on every single ad so that the data becomes worthless and the companies that are advertising have a negative return on investment. But it does mean that the ad server company gets more money.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      you’ll enjoy a fun browser addon then! - adnauseum

      it clicks on every. single. ad both doing what you’re doing, but also poisoning the data Google has on you. From their website:

      As the collected data gathered shows an omnivorous click-stream, user tracking, targeting and surveillance become futile

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        hat’s a cute idea but it completely ignores that it isn’t 2005 anymore. Algorithms are good enough to detect that.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          eh, on the off chance they aren’t, why not. I don’t see those ads anyway and I do enjoy being a nuisance, even if a minor one

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    On Linux or Windows? Firefox + uBlock origin (there’s nothing better than that)

    On Mac? Firefox + uBlock origin (worse alternative: Safari + AdGuard, since you might synch browser with iPhone)

    On Android? Firefox + Privacy Badger + uBlock Origin

    On iOS? Safari + AdGuard + Vinegar + Baking Soda

    On SmartTV it’s different.

    Hardest overall solution: Get yourself a Pi-Hole https://pi-hole.net/

    For WebOS TVs use this: https://github.com/webosbrew/youtube-webos

    Android TVs should get SmartTube: https://github.com/yuliskov/smarttube#smarttube-old-name-smarttubenext

    RokuTVs got either this thing: https://channelstore.roku.com/en-ca/details/840aec36f51bfe6d96cf6db9055a372a/playlet or the open source alternative: https://github.com/iBicha/playlet

  • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Put a pi-hole in my rooter filtering all adds of all webs and apps was the best thing I ever did.

    • Slovene@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      put a pi-hole in my rooter

      Giggity What would be the definition if it was in the urban dictionary?

      • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Allot of my phrases tend to be like this without noticing… Its like a power I think

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I remember life without adblockers. Back when they were not needed, because web sited did not have ads.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        At least those were a) just banner ads and b) not as annoying as modern JS/HTML5/popup/popover ads are. You just scrolled down a few pixel, and had 100% information.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Yes we had 3 more years where numerous other variants of things like pop-up/under ads, ads that ran malicious java script, infinitely self-replicating pop-ups, ads that instantly played music at full volume, ads that kept opening themselves again as you closed them, and so on.

          Basically, the time when ads were not super intrusive, on the web, was a fleeting time, in its infancy. Didn’t even make it 6 years before ad blockers were required to safely use the web.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      did you use the internet in '92 or something? because even in mid to late 90s the ads were so cancerous that pop-up blocking eventually became a standard feature of browsers before ad blockers were even a thing.

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Seriously. Someone never clicked on the “you are an idiot” popup that auto-played music, moved around the screen, prevented task manager from opening and cloned itself if it was closed.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        My first contact with the web (I had been in the internet for some time already) was when a collegue at university told me about the Arena browser, and this new system, “like Gopher, but with Hypertext and pictures”. And yes, I’ve seen the CERN website, served from Tim Barners-Lee’s NeXT cube, too.

        So yes, I knew the web before there were ads, the internet when services were normally open to all sides, and when people on the internet that were actually much smarter than average.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Up to early 00’ most webs didn’t really have many ads. Some may have abusive advertisement but it wasn’t everywhere like now.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        The installers for every major software company riddled every single computer with adware. And you needed a compsci degree to get rid of it. Weren’t there lawsuits over that shit, that led to regulations? I remember that happening. It’s not like they were going to stop doing that of their own accord.

    • somenonewho@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I remember when I first noticed YouTube had ads. They’ve had them a while but before they got ads I had installed an ad blocker. So when I was setting up a new laptop and just testing if everything worked I loaded up a YouTube video and suddenly there was a pre roll playing and I wondered “What the fuck is this … Ah yes still need Toni stall an ad blocker”

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Even better, make a list of the ads you see, and activelly avoid buying the products or services that they promote.