• stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Indies I think helped younger gamers and old gamers become less impressed by graphics compared to the past. Gamers expect more and there’s many indies and old games people haven’t played.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      There is also just tiny graphic improvements now, so for most people, 5 years old games look similar to what we have now

      • Cossty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I would even go lower than that. If you showed me Prey 2017 or even Alien Isolation 2014, and told me they came out today. I would probably believe you.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        You can sort of tell by the whole 4k (or even 8k), 144Hz stuff that opportunities for real improvements have been running out for a while.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Which is why they were ignored for a decade or two despite game engines easily achieving those FPS numbers and were pulled out exactly when the hardware vendors ran out of any other arguments to convince people to replace their existing screens and GPUs?

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        And that the requirements for those minimal improvements are vast. If you need to pull down 200GB for a minor graphical upgrade, that’s just not really worth it compared to an older game that is a bit graphically worse, but is both smaller, and runs better on newer hardware.