Yup, boarder towns in red states are going to start stopping women as they travel through their towns to make sure they aren’t pregnant.

  • jimbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disregarding the fact that getting an abortion should not be a crime, in general, traveling to commit a crime is not a right.

      • Kittenstix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better comparison is

        Weed smokers don’t get charged for driving across state lines to buy and smoke pot in a legal state.

      • frododouchebaggins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because that is already a federal crime.

        Other crimes do rack up more charges when crossing state lines. Because a crime can violate a local law, but then violate federal law by crossing state lines. Bank robbery is already a federal crime.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t think prosecutors add charges when someone commits a crime? Why do you think Trump is being charged with multiple things?

          I have never heard of the charge of ‘driving to a crime’ being added.

          But feel free to show that driving to a bank robbery is a federal crime. I would like to see that law please.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disregarding the fact that getting an abortion should not be a crime, in general, traveling to commit a crime is not a right.

      This puts the cart before the horse in important ways. First, the government cannot (except with probable cause) treat you as if you are presumptively guilty of a crime until it’s done with the due process of proving it. Is being female and in a car probable cause?

      Second, is it a crime to travel somewhere to do a thing that’s legal there?

      Here, both the 4th Amendment and the Commerce Clause of the constitution (in theory at least) constrain the state and officers of said state- the 4th protects privacy of person, home, effects, and papers and requires a warrant to search those things, and the commerce clause implicitly forbids states from enacting laws that effectively regulate commerce in another state.

      In theory, under the Commerce Clause states are not authorized to enact law to criminalize that which is legal in other states- that authority is reserved to congress. If that’s the case, the phrase ‘traveling to commit a crime is not a right’ is missing an important piece- the crime part. If abortion is a crime here and the person is traveling there to do a thing that’s legal there, this isn’t a crime.