• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have a lot of questions about different parts of this title that I don’t understand, but I support him.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      10 months ago

      Marc Tyler Nobleman was supposed to talk to kids about the secret co-creator of Batman, with the aim of inspiring young students in suburban Atlanta’s Forsyth County to research and write.

      Then the school district told him he had to cut a key point from his presentation — that the artist he helped rescue from obscurity had a gay son. Rather than acquiesce, he canceled the last of his talks.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      10 months ago

      Comic Book Historian would have been a better title. I thought “batman” might have been referring to an unrelated school or something.

  • Flambo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Then the school district told him he had to cut a key point from his presentation — that the artist he helped rescue from obscurity had a gay son. Rather than acquiesce, he canceled the last of his talks.

    “We’re long past the point where we should be policing people talking about who they love,” Nobleman said in a telephone interview. “And that’s what I’m hoping will happen in this community.”

    They didn’t ask him not to “say ‘gay’”, as the title all but claims. They asked him to participate in the erasure of a relevant gay person from a story he was teaching to children.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      I dunno, would he mention the artist had a straight son? Or is it just a son in that case?

    • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait, was it a relevant person?

      It’s the son of the artist, right? Did the son have anything to do with Batman? Did the son’s sexual orientation have anything to do with Batman?

      What else is relevant about the son? Was he an artist? A writer? What did he do for a living? Did he have any relevant health disorders? Food preferences? Did he have any children?

      BROADLY SPEAKING, your sexual preferences are the least interesting or relevant things in any conversation, unless we’re considering dating each other.

      I don’t know the history of Batman so maybe it’s actually relevant, but my gut says it’s just not.

    • crackajack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you’re curious as to why the title is like that, it should have prompted you to read the article as to why.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah. Not worth my time, lol.

        Imagine caring about everything you see on the internet.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lol. Do you think you were being clever?

            It’d still be a waste of my time to read the article.

            Sorry that’s too much for you to understand.

  • bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The world is way more tribalistic than most people realize.

    You say or do anything that goes against the tribe you’re in, you’re going to have a bad time.

    • Staccato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think you have it backwards. People realize tribalism so intrinsically it doesn’t even register.

      The beauty of the social justice push we’ve seen from the 70s to today is that it actively tries to counteract the human tribal instinct to create a more fair and inclusive world. Granted, I’m not sure how successful it’s been at removing tribalism… it just seems to have redefined the tribes.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, I’m referring to the school or community as the tribe.

        Even if they’re wrong, since there’s more of them than you, they’re right.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s pretty much all it is or has ever been. I’m fine with it though. We are what we are.

      I’m just happy to be here to play a little music and video games.

      My tribe’s music of course. My tribe makes the best music. Of course I feel that way.