“Nobody uses water,” one man in a Dodgers cap said in Spanish when Maria Cabrera approached, holding flyers about silicosis, an incurable and suffocating disease that has devastated dozens of workers across the state and killed men who have barely reached middle age.

The disease dates back centuries, but researchers say the booming popularity of countertops made of engineered stone, which has much higher concentrations of silica than many kinds of natural stone, has driven a new epidemic of an accelerated form of the suffocating illness. As the dangerous dust builds up and scars the lungs, the disease can leave workers short of breath, weakened and ultimately suffering from lung failure.

“You can get a transplant,” Cabrera told the man in Spanish, “but it won’t last.”

In California, it has begun to debilitate young workers, largely Latino immigrants who cut and polish slabs of engineered stone. Instead of cropping up in people in their 60s or 70s after decades of exposure, it is now afflicting men in their 20s, 30s or 40s, said Dr. Jane Fazio, a pulmonary critical care physician who became alarmed by cases she saw at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center. Some California patients have died in their 30s.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    11 months ago

    The answer here is simple- regulations with teeth.

    Every saw uses water. Every worker wears a mask. Random inspections.

    Inspector sees one person without a mask? $1000 fine. One machine with no water hooked up? $5000 fine. 10 people with no masks and 3 machines with no water hooked up? $25,000 fine. Make it clear that there is no fucking around here.

    Job site like described in the article? Shut down until problems fixed.

    • I’d further add personally liability of all supervisors, managers and executives. You run such an operation and cannot prove without a doubt that you instructed for safety, provided the necessary tools and materials and did regulary inspections yourself? You pay for everyones treatment and damages.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        Personal liability (piercing the corporate shield) is a really tough nut to crack. That’d also do some outsized harm- think kids college fund raided for settlement money.
        That said, I’d be happy to make it a personal crime to, with knowledge of the law, instruct any worker to use a machine without safety equipment and water hookup, or to work without a mask. THAT should be a personal crime, like criminal charges. And you should have to, when hired for any such supervisory position, sign a one-piece thing that has that law laid out so you can’t claim you didn’t know the law.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          In my country (Germany) as an architect or civil engineer you can be held liable, in some cases also as an employee, when deliberately or grossly negligently violating technical rules.

          At the end of the day no college fund is more important than peoples lifes, but there exist liability insurance specific to certain jobs. It is similiar to doctors malpractice insurance. Expanding the concept to site supervisors seems reasonable to me.

          And of course that must not except the company from liability. It should mainly take effect, when the companies liability cannot cover anymore.

          • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Engineering and architecture are different. It’s our job to make sure the things we design bring no harm to people and we have specialized training allowing us to take that responsibility on.

            Site supervisors are often tradespeople, and may not even have the authority to direct health and safety measures on their site if corporate sees otherwise. I agree, they have a responsibility to do so, but it must be started from the top with some coercion by strong regulation. Putting liability personally on supervisors just removes it from the company who likely made the decision to forego supplying water because of cost savings.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Site supervisors… may not even have the authority to direct health and safety measures on their site if corporate sees otherwise.

              So what? That’d change real quick if site supervisors became personally liable.

              Well, either that, or “corporate” would suddenly be unable to find anybody willing to do the job and go out of business. It’s a win either way!

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s the key- deliberate or grossly negligent. If a supervisor, through deliberate choice or inexcusable gross negligence, instructs an employee to work in an unsafe manner, I have no problem making that a criminal offense that makes both the company and the supervisor liable.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is well reasoned.

          All injuries arising out of employment should fall under workers’ comp., except if the injury is caused intentionally.

          Even recklessness, I think, it best suited for workers’ comp. I would make workers’ comp. benefits more robust.

          I would support criminal liability for wanton or reckless conduct by coworkers.

          Unlike with asbestos, the companies that mine and make the raw countertops have clearly labeled their products and warned of the risks of silicosis.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        As a manager of blue collar workers that actually gives a shit about my teams this is the answer unfortunately. Many managers don’t care but will if they’re personally liable.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Set up a monitored tip line where supervisors can tell the govt that management isn’t giving them the proper PPE to protect their workers. That way if management isn’t giving them PPE, supervisors have a place to go turn to instead of being squeezed from both ends. Get an OSHA inspector out on a surprise trip and get upper management fined.

        Supervisors need to care about their direct reports first and foremost, over any company demands. One of the best supervisors I’ve ever had gave me therapist recommendations when I mentioned having a tough time with mental health, and she told me she sometimes took personal days for her own mental health. Another supervisor, when I was going through an even more rough period of mental health, told me that his wife had bipolar and they put a lot of time and effort in, together, for her to feel alright.

        I felt like I had those guys in my corner, and I knew that if push came to shove, they’d have my back. They may have ultimately been powerless to internal HR policies, but they reaffirmed to me that my health should be my top priority and I needed to put it first.

        That’s what it means to have a workplace as a family. The leader truly cares about everyone on the team and has their back.

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think each violation should carry a heftier fine than the last, so each worker without a mask would be a 25% nominal increase.

      1 without? $1000 2 without? $1000 + $1250 3 without? $1000 + $1250 + $1562.50 10 without? You’re looking at a $42,566.13 fine

      You have to have escalations, otherwise violating the regulations becomes a business expense, not a punishment.

      • jumperalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well, in this case I’d say split the difference and make it each incident escalates where an incident #1 = “we caught you, we told you”, incident #2 = “we told you yesterday to fix your shit / don’t do it again, 2x fine” rinse repeat. Otherwise you run the risk of bankrupting a small business that had all 10 of their workers in violation, and maybe even not making a dent in a large business that only had 1 out of 1000 workers caught in violation

        In addition to per-incident escalation, what I could get on board with are scaled fines based on contract / business size. The first incident is still “survivable” for small businesses but will actually have teeth for those larger ones. And then of course if they keep violating, say bye-bye economic viability.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree very much. I think on the low end fines should go down to be survivable for a small business, and we don’t need to fine a big company $100k because someone took their mask off.
        But fines should increase steeply by number of offenses, and multiply if management is willfully refusing to provide a safe working environment (IE doesn’t want to pay to have a machine hooked up to water/drain, doesn’t want to pay to have filters cleaned, doesn’t want to pay for masks / goggles / other PPE, etc).

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      gonna need higher fines than that. Its not some rinky dinky small outfits that are handling fancy counter tops like that.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    The fucked up part of this is how preventable it is. Very few folks will take to wearing a mask though, when that’s all they need.

    • Balios@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      11 months ago

      Here’s the full set of measures recommended:

      Workplace safety regulators have recommended a suite of measures including water spraying systems, ventilation and vacuum systems to clear dust, in addition to protective respirators for workers — ones covering the entire face if silica levels in the air are high.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have had countertops put in two different times. The first time the crew had a water saw and masks. The second time I was horrified to see the guys cutting the stuff raw without even a paper mask on.

  • Steak@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 months ago

    I worked for a few spray-foam insulation companies in my early 20’s. I’m just waiting to hear the same thing from spray foam. Half the guys I worked with didn’t wear masks most of the time and were just covered in foam all day breathing in the off gassing of fire retardents and blowing agents and other nasty chemicals. I quit because I saw the writing on the wall and my boss hated me for quitting before training my replacement. I told him it wasn’t worth my health.

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The dumbest thing is the mentality between workers sometimes. “Don’t be a pussy” some will say when you ask for masks/goggles/ear plugs/etc but none of them will be there when you eventually get injured or sick. None of them will congratulate you, hand you a tough-guy-trophy and pay your medical bills + pension.

      • Steak@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah he was my boss and I was a decent sprayer, and a very very good helper. So to make fun of me wouldn’t have worked well for him. He understood my concerns. My other coworkers were not like that though, like someone in a comment above me said. They’d all crack jokes at me because I took safety very seriously. I would like to see how they are all doing now and I wonder about their health sometimes. I didn’t keep in touch with any of them though and live far away now.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The EPA/OSHA cut hexavalent chromium exposure limits by 100. Aircraft workers have been spraying, painting and airbrushing that shit for fucking ever. It’s uniquely good at its task (anti-corrosion) so there’s no making it go away any time soon.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    I did construction very briefly (“briefly” because the company owner quit paying me after a while); companies cut corners every possible place they can, because any safety measures cost time or productivity. Even doing things properly costs time and money that they don’t want to spend. Construction is competitive, so they’re bidding as low as possible, and promising unrealistic delivery times, and then turning around and expecting their workers to make those deadlines and costs.

    You can’t fix this without stringent oversight, and criminal prosecution for the owners that are refusing to give workers the correct tools, and follow safety protocols.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    to debilitate young workers, largely Latino immigrants

    in an industry where immigrant workers typically labor in small shops and are often paid in cash

    made their rounds at the parking lot of the Home Depot in San Fernando, where laborers in long-sleeve shirts waited for people to drive up and offer them work.

    In the effort to be politically correct and not say “illegal immigrants”, they prevent the reader from knowing the true extent of the problem.

    When an employer is willing to break employment laws related to immigration, they may also be more likely to break other laws, like workplace safety laws. When the employees are illegal immigrants, they’re not as able to complain to authorities when their employers are breaking safety laws.

    If these workers were actual legal immigrants, they could blow the whistle on their employers. If they were unionized their union could shut down the business until their bosses took their safety seriously. But, because they’re illegal immigrants an unethical employer can treat them as disposable – and, pretty much by definition, anybody who is hiring illegal immigrants is an unethical employer.

    The people affected here are largely stone workers. Stone workers used to be extremely powerful. The Freemason fraternal organization started as stone workers who held the secrets of the profession, supervised stoneworker qualifications, controlled their interactions with clients, regulated their interactions with the state, etc. Now, because of the widespread acceptance of illegal immigration, not only are stoneworkers not powerful, they’re disposable.

    • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You make a good point about how workers have been played against each other to the disadvantage of all. However, there is a lot of area between illegal immigrants and full citizens who are comfortable bringing their employers to court. Many legal immigrants spend years in situations where being fired or quitting would mean having to leave the country. Depending on what they’d be going back to or what family and life they have built here in the meantime, they may be less free to rock the boat even if they felt confident in the legal system. Even citizens would be unlikely to take a stand without the support of some larger group.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Depends on what you’re used to. Some people fight using PPE when they really shouldn’t be fighting it. It’s a difficult nut to crack since too much force from corporate over stupid safety shit fatigues workers to that kind of shit. Finding the right balance isn’t easy.

    • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The knowledge is out there and common, the machines come built in with hoses to damper the material. Run the hose. Wear a damn mask. It’s not hard.

      I’m not going to feel especially sorry for folks who choose to not use safety equipment.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Oh dear God I remember being warned about this in a chem lab because we were using some silica.

    Dust/particulates are always bad for the lungs. I don’t think there’s any exception. Masks with a fitness test need to be provided and specified as PPE for this kind of work, at the very least. The company is unlikely to do so themselves unless legally pressured to.

    Edit from my double comment: employers are required to provide functioning, proper PPE to employees per OSHA, and also train them on properly using it. If masks and water hoses aren’t already considered required, we need to make sure that gets updated. Force the companies to comply or be sued.

    I very recently watched a safety module thing about this for work actually as part of the training requirement.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    We hear about machines replacing jobs all the time. Why can’t they replace cutting fucking countertops so people don’t die in their fucking 20s?

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ironically the virus scare made N95s unobtanium or very expensive for several years there. Gonna guess that didn’t help with safety compliance amongst the mostly low-income people doing this kind of work.

    • Cat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is sad to hear. I live in an area where almost no one wore masks. Even at the hight of the pandemic. Our local pharmacies got a bunch of N95s for free to give away free. There was supposed to be a limit but since no one was using them they would give me a lot of extra. I’m guessing they still have boxes stacked up somewhere.

  • tcrichard@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve been to a place that does this. Everything was covered in water. It prevents any dust getting in the air. The slab and blades have water spraying over it. I don’t think a mask was even necessary. But without water I assume it would be awful.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Most of the guys I know in any form of manual labor jobs are the kind of guys that would rather die than wear a mask to protect themselves or others from anything, so this not even slightly surprising to see.

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ah yes because it’s the worker’s responsibility to ensure that all safety equipment first, exists period, and second, works perfectly at all times.