- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
U.S. conservatives aren’t satisfied oppressing and killing vulnerable people here in the U.S. They need to expand their death cloud to other vulnerable groups.
There is no such thing as a “good conservative” alive today. Conservatism is a plague of death that is long overdue for a cure.
US conservatives have been on Putin’s payroll for quite some time now. Remember that the NRA - a major conservative lobbying group - was infiltrated by a Russian agent for quite a while.
Kevin McCarthy said that the two people he believes Russia owns are Dana Rohrabacher (?sp) and Donald Trump. And Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly promoted on Russian tv.
One or the other, no in-between. America is a joke.
That is an incredibly overgeneralized view of the situation. It’s precisely this kind of polarization, and viewing everything in terms of black and white, that Putin and allies are reveling in.
What a lovely quote from the tolerant left.
Nearly every act of racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia and anti-semitism ever committed in the U.S. has been committed by conservatives.
Nearly every act of domestic terrorism ever committed in the U.S. has been committed by conservatives.
Nearly every bigot you will ever meet in the U.S. is an outspoken conservative.
I am fresh out of tolerance for conservatives. There is no place in a modern society for conservatism. Period.
Close minded, ignorant, and intolerant you are a trifecta.
Biden along with many other liberals were staunch supporters of segregation, Many leaders and members in the black rights movement are antisemitic, segregated spaces on campuses are a modern liberal idea,
Domestic terrorism has been used by liberal nutjobs for decades there were a bunch of liberal groups in 60s 70s and 80s that bombed federal buildings (weather underground, black Panthers, anarchists, …) It wasn’t until the 80s that right wing nut jobs started following the liberal terrorism playbook.
I doubt you’ve ever had tolerance for any idea that you didn’t agree with.
Biden is not a liberal. He is a neo-liberal. Neo-liberals are conservatives.
By actual bodycount, number of acts committed and financial loss, conservatives have committed almost all of the domestic terrorism the U.S. has ever experienced.
Your defense of fascism and fake opinions are a reminder that every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation. Every word.
There’s no true Scotsman…
Now you’ve moved the goalposts but you didn’t move them far enough. Your comrades killed a lot of people in the name of the greater good. The weather underground, SLA, NWLF, black Panthers… were responsible for hundreds of bombings in the 70s, that’s just one decade. The issue is your manifesto calls for violent overthrow of the government to start communism, and your comrades have been stupid enough to believe it.
You’ve made yourself quite a useful idiot.
I guess the EU would rather fight Russia themselves.
Ukraine’s doing the dying. But we will likely end up having to support them on our own, if Trump’s re-elected. The US is no longer a reliable NATO ally.
The problem is that it takes time to build weapons factories and existing stockpiles are low. We can barely keep up manufacturing what we’ve promised, let alone increase what we’re giving.
Not like the Russians, who never throw anything away, and happily send their troops to the front with crap that the west would have scrapped decades ago. Obviously, that results in a lot of Russians dying or being maimed, but they don’t give a fuck about their own people.
The US, Canada, and the UK are NATO.
If the “special relationship” club isn’t in the next nation holding the line is Turkey, and the EU has made its feelings very clear on what they think of that even when it’s not being run by Erdogan.
Europe is funding Ukraine by considerably more than the US currently. Short-term funding is essential equal between the two, but the US is providing basically no multi-year funding whereas the EU is providing significant multi-year funding.
Rather visit here, this is the original and unaltered Article: https://apnews.com/article/eu-ukraine-summit-armenia-serbia-granada-823a8734716f0fc717a61adbacff1c65
Any report from somewhere, that has not „mixed“ for factual reporting?
Lots of credit for checking the reliability of the reporting!
If you check the byline, you’ll see that the article is written by AFP - Agence France-Presse. Media bias / fact check for Agence France-Presse:
Overall, we rate AFP Least Biased based on balanced story selection and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing.
This article is a altered Version of an Associated Press Article that is worded differently.
Check for yourself.
https://apnews.com/article/eu-ukraine-summit-armenia-serbia-granada-823a8734716f0fc717a61adbacff1c65
This will be a dumb question so apologies but I’ve started to wonder this.
If EU commits 100 odd billion to Ukraine, how does Ukraine receive that money? Are they essentially budgeting 100 billion for purchasing supplies and weapons? I assume Ukraine has a national bank to process these electronically.
There was an article posted here somewhere, talking about the civilian impact of losing money from the US. It basically said aid was keeping the economy going, including paying all public employees
