So here we go again…

Please direct all comments and links regarding the actual VOTING to this thread.

Edit

@TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee provided the live CSpan link!

Thank you!

https://www.c-span.org/video/?531158-1/house-session=&live=

1st vote count is in:

Hakeem Jeffries - 212 (217 needed to win)
Jim Jordan - 200
Steve Scalise - 7
Kevin McCarthy - 6
“Others” - 7

Jordan could have only lost 4 votes, he lost 20.

2nd vote came through, he lost 2 more votes. Will update when I get the actual breakdown.

https://apnews.com/house-speaker-live-updates-day-2

"The final vote was 212 for Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries and 199 for Jordan, with others voting for alternatives.

The Ohio congressman lost 22 Republican votes, two more than in the first round and 18 more than he could afford to lose."

Full count here which is not CURRENTLY paywalled:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/10/17/us/politics/house-speaker-vote-tally.html

Jeffries - 212
Jordan - 199
Scalise - 7
McCarthy - 5
Zeldin - 3
“Others” - 7 (one each)

Edit 3rd vote for Thursday has been called off as Jim Jordan now supports expanding the powers of Speaker Pro Temp Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) through January 3rd.

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/speaker-of-house-vote-live-updates-10-19-2023/

It’s unclear when or if THAT vote will go forward as other Republicans oppose it, although it will only take a bare handfull, working with the Democrats, to make it happen.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    9 months ago

    The guy described HIMSELF as “David Duke without the baggage.” I’ve never seen a word do as much lifting as the word “baggage” as he used it.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      9 months ago

      I really want to know, what’s left when you take away the baggage from “David Duke”.

      Did he have any redeeming qualities?

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 months ago

          So if you consider the Grand Wizard as the baggage, that leaves us with “failed politician.” If you consider failed politician as the baggage, that leaves the KKK.

          So he’s a bright star for maga dumb-dumbs either way.

          • tacosplease@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            I consider the baggage to be the fact that people know David Duke was racist. Had they not known about the racism, he would not have baggage.

            I think that is what Scalice was saying. He’s like David Duke except not everyone knows how racist he is.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re one internet search away from knowing.

        Guarantee if you search that with no other context, the first result will be the right one.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    So, the Republican Party is down with the KKK. The mask is off, isn’t it?

    Will the “liberal media” please catch up?

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Scalise beat Jordan 113-99.

    Democrats unanimously renominated House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.,

    To win the gavel, a candidate needs support from a majority of the House members present, meaning the eventual speaker will need 217 votes if every one of the current members votes and does so for a candidate by name. There are currently 433 members, with two vacancies, so a majority is 217.

    If members are absent, or if some vote present instead of supporting a candidate, that decreases what the majority vote needs to be. The House is intended to have a total membership of 435 members, so a majority is usually 218.

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a long shot, but Moderate Republicans and McCarthy supporters could cast a vote for Democrat Jefferies as a FU to the Freedom Caucus. They would likely be able to get things done as a result.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly, I’m really don’t understand why this didn’t happen last time.

      Surely there have to be a few Republicans in Blue leaning districts that just barely got voted in and are at risk of losing their seat next election.

      There is just so much to gain by putting country above party under those circumstances.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That will never happen. It’s much more likely IMHO for Democrats to throw some votes at a moderate Republican to get them over the line. Not Kevin, probably not Steve Scalise.

      Becoming Speaker is only part of the story, though. The Speaker sets the agenda (meaning the day’s schedule) but that agenda is subject to a vote and needs a majority every single time. So any Democrats who support a Republican (or vice versa) would have to be relied on to vote in favor of that speaker’s scheduling, otherwise nothing can be scheduled.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, it is very unlikely to happen, but still more likely than any Republicans voting for Democrats.

      • donuts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The only way one side is voting for the other’s nominee is if they get a deal with some real concessions. I don’t see it happening.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Meanwhile in Canada we just got free (covered) dental care for youth, and will be getting a pharmacare plan because 1 party needed the others support to govern and gave concession.

          Imagine what they could actually do in the US if they actually worked together out of this madness.

          Edit: There’s gotta be hundreds of things moderates in both parties could agree to as concessions for joint support.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Jeffries was picked by the House Democrats. It’s not a long shot, it’s 100% fever dream impossible that any Republicans would just vote for the Democrat option.

      The long shot is getting a group of half moderate Republicans and half moderate Democrats and picking a Republican speaker who is moderate. That’s not going to happen either.

      The barely realistic possibility of bipartisan Speaker votes is a few moderate Democrats vote for a Republican candidate.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Jeffries is probably closer than Scalise.

        When they finally do a vote, I can see the ranking of Jeffries #1, Scalise #2, whoever else is dumb enough to run #3.

        With none of them getting 217, but Jeffries hitting 209 or 210.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There we go! One of the Dems had the balls to call him what he is. A fucking insurrectionist. Fuck Gym Jorden and the Republican party.

  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You all should see the picture in “Jim Jordan fails to win the speakership on first ballot” at CNN. Absolutely hilarious.

    Oh man, my day has absolutely been brightened.

    EDIT: Here, I’ll try posting a picture:

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wonder if Scalise can beat McCarthy’s record fifteen votes? I’ll bet he can!

  • NegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Groundhog day:

    The House adjourned without a vote for a new speaker. The Republican caucus have not reached the necessary 217 votes within the conference to elect Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who leads in the GOP with 152 in favor. [link]

    • Midnight@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      At least one member said they were switching from McCarthy to Jordan on the second vote, so sadly we’re probably not going to get a revolt.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      We’ll leave the Megapost up for now just in case there are some surprise midnight shenanigans, but nice catch!