I can guarantee you that is not the argument that anyone not voting for Harris because of Gaza was using.
I can guarantee you that is not the argument that anyone not voting for Harris because of Gaza was using.
I am pretty sure Ubuntu is still far and away the most popular desktop distro. For servers I would have guessed it was something like RedHat/CentOS or possibly Debian.
In my head I have always thought it was YOO-fee, similar to the beginning of “Europe”…
Huh? It’s referenced by name right there in the screenshot…
I think it’s correct as-is. Inserting a “were” would make that clause read as independent. With how the sentence is currently structured, that doesn’t work.
That’s not to say you couldn’t have
The tracks are now unruley [sic] and wild—the people once tied to them were killed in crosswalks by giant trucks
if you want, but the comma needs to change to something like a dash or a semicolon. With a comma (i.e., as a subordinate clause), “were” doesn’t make sense.
Because he defederated them?
WebPlotDigitizer! It’s a great tool.
Here is my attempt at digitizing that plot and then log-scaling the vertical axis.
Yes, because now you’ve added the critical qualifier “who have ever been on the ballot”. Without that, it doesn’t hold.
No black woman has ever won the election or lost the election, because the set of black women who have ever been on the ballot before is empty.
Not really, since in most (all?) U.S. presidential elections to date there has not been a black woman on the ballot. I think there’s an important semantic difference between losing and not winning. The equal but opposite statement to the OP would be that a black woman has never won the election, which is true.
I of course wish it was fully open source
Allow me to introduce you to Codium
I too was similarly confused by the original comment at first, but I think they’re referring to the fact that 6pm GMT is 7pm in London during the summer (BST), and 6pm in London the rest of the year. It seems OP and “them” are both correct in that hypothetical exchange.
In fact, if you read it, it specifically says it can’t be…
I haven’t heard this before. Why do you say that?
In short? Medical debt. Emergency rooms will treat you, and in some cases might offer discounted rates for patients without insurance, but at the end of the day you are still responsible for the bill, however large it may be.
Huh? In what world is it ableist to advocate for/promote the use of a real accessibility feature over a workaround that doesn’t work on all platforms on which people might be seeing this content??