Rogan promoted the conspiracy theory that Epps was an “agent provocateur” for the feds, a baseless claim that has led to a defamation suit against Fox News.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stop paying attention to him. He was over validated as being a great interviewer, but that’s only because he created a safe space for right-wing reactionaries to pander to conservative bros. His takes are trash, his hyper masculine routine is tired and lame, and he is a regular source of immediately debunkable misinformation.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s a terrible interviewer. I attempted to listen to one of his podcasts many years ago because the interviewee was someone I was interested in. Joe Rogan quite obviously had no fucking clue about the specifics of why this person is notable, and his line of questioning was uneducated and irritating.

      I never tried to listen/watch to Rogan again.

    • 8bitguy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vote with your wallet. Deezer is pretty good. I switched to them when Spotify decided I needed Rogan in my life despite their algorithm undoubtedly indicating otherwise.

      • GreenCrush@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Recommend Tidal as well if you like smaller artists. The search feature is nowhere near as good, but the curated playlists seem better to me. And you’re top 2 artists of the month, I think, get 10% of your subscription fee directly.

      • mr_sifl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I switched to YouTube music and have been happy with it. The family plan is about the same price as Spotify and includes YouTube premium which has been an unexpectedly nice bonus.

        • garretble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m kinda the opposite: I got YouTube Red (now Premium) to kill ads and got a music service for “free.”

          With the added bonus of no Rogan.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Far far better. While still being problematic capitalist whores. Who will shamelessly chase attention clicks and money.

            There is a lot of trash on YouTube. And some of it is even monetized. You can correct me if I’m wrong. But alphabet has not paid for exclusivity or sought out any of those trash makers. The evil Google does is pursuing engagement. And the best most assured way of achieving that is through controversy and outrage. Google is generally neutrally evil. And while evil. It’s still better then the other alternatives. Though I would genuinely like to see an alternative like peer tube someday be able to supplant them.

            • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I will have to disagree. The reason alphabet don’t hire specific outrage manufacturers is because they already get their cut. They make a fortune from Jo Rogan videos and other conspiracy nuts through youtube. And they are more than happy to push these people to tops of our algorithms to capitalise

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re not pushing it to the top of the algorithms. The algorithms are driven by engagement. And outrage is one of the most sure drivers. You’re attributing far more to Google than I think we can reasonably prove their involved in. Never attribute to malice what could be attributed to incompetence.

                • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They are pushing it to the top of the algorithms. The algorithms are driven by engagement and outrage is one of the most sure drivers.

                  Google is more than aware that outrage makes money. It’s a bit like saying I work a day job baking cookies and do contract killing on the side, so I’m not as bad as the guy who does contract killing fulltime. While it is objectively better why bother defending it?

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Definitely. Between YouTube and my jellyfin server. I basically don’t watch any other streaming services or live television outside of Pluto, or the currently airing season of what we do in the shadows

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I do encourage everyone to drop all Meta platforms, but generally speaking “vote with your wallet” is ineffectual.

        There is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

        Edit: choosing what makes you happier is never ineffectual, but capitalism is not a democracy. You can’t “vote” out a company by choosing not to use their product, especially when that company owns many of the options or has control over the majority of the market.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is voting with your wallet ineffectual?

          There’s a confirmation bias at work here. The shitty things people didn’t pay for don’t exist.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep it’s totally unnecessary to pay anyone for streaming music.

        Just obtain your own MP3s of the music you prefer, and listen to those files on your device. It’s the 2000s way to music, and it’s still the best.

        Internet connectivity is not available everywhere, so you may encounter areas that streaming doesn’t work. MP3 collections don’t have that problem.

        You can also get your own Plex server or something like that if you really just want to stream your music. That’s another way to have your music on hand without bullshit subscriptions.

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guy that got paid to make contestants eat bugs and donkey dicks gets paid to make podcast listeners eat bugs and donkey dicks.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But it’s not a fact. Like, by definition, it’s literally not.

    These fucking grown toddlers think anything that offends their feefees is bad, or wrong, or illegal. Because they have no coping mechanism beyond throwing a tantrum. Grow. the. fuck. up.

    People that don’t share your views exist, and they are important too…

    • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      What he doesn’t get is that you need a accompanying talking therapy if you make a show like that, personal invested and frequent. Even the most grounded character would start to drift, sooner or later. We are after all just human and nobody can fight that in the long run alone.

  • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never listened to Joe Rogan, is his right wing leanings a newer development? Or has he always been in the “free thinker”, ie conservative camp? I saw a snippet of his show years ago, and it didn’t come across as politically charged, but it was a small snippet, and times have definitely changed, polarity wise.

    • vyajomjnx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Much like many self-identifying “centrists” he certainly likes to hang out with right-wing individuals and let them talk. He does sometimes push back, but his podcast does better when he doesn’t.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He is very right leaning, but interestingly, when he last had Bernie Sanders on, he claimed to be progressive.

      Like all humans, he is complicated and doesn’t hold beliefs strictly to one side. He makes his money catering to the right, his personal views have likely shifted that way over time to match.

      In the past, he had more interesting and varied guests, but those days are long gone.

      • jerkjaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought he was a libertarian, maybe? I used to listen to the podcast years ago but I feel like it got more political, he leaned more right, got more popular, repeat, until it was the number 1 podcast but idk

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          He had the number 1 podcast already when he has Bernie on and semi-endorsed him.

          Covid seems to be what really broke his brain and pulled him right hard.

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who cares what this idiot says? I know plenty of idiots, why care about this one’s perspective?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spotify doesn’t publicly release its JRE subscriber numbers. But sources clarified the show has been consistently growing since the podcaster joined the streamer and hasn’t spiked due to any particular event. By one recent estimate, Rogan typically averages 11 million listeners per episode.

      https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/joe-rogan-spotify-subscribers-1235134232/

      Any time someone on the internet says, “who cares what this idiot says” about someone prominent, the answer is always: millions of people.

      • crowsby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spotify is also paying Rogan $200 million for the honor of being the exclusive platform used to spread his disinformation, which is one of the reasons I prefer to avoid it. It’s bad enough they distribute it, but the fact that my subscriber dollars would directly be funding his bullshit just sticks in my craw too much.

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Much like John Oliver’s Truthiness, Joe Rogan does a caricature of skepticism. He does the Question Things part, but then gets dazzled by whatever answers are spicy, instead of the most reasonable or likely.

    On a completely unrelated note, I wonder what Joe Rogan would sound like after a year of sobriety from all recreational drugs, and bullshit supplements.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Joe Rogan is a cunt who straight up claimed that he knows for a fact “they put litterboxes in class rooms, because some kids feel like playing like cats”

      even though in reality it was just put there so that in case of school shooting kids don’t have to pee on the floor.

      then when called out on it, he just claimed “he was joking”

      • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing at all. What I was trying to say was that Joe questions stuff, but that is the extent of his brand of skepticism. While on the surface, it may sound like (to his followers, possibly himself) he’s being a skeptic, his inability to accept a dull truth, in favor of fanciful claims means that he’s doing a caricature of skepticism.

        It’s fake skepticism, and is a podcast/banter version of truthiness.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rogan flips like a light switch. One day he’s all about the science and the next he’s got some mouth breather telling him the moon is made out of cheese.

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s playing both sides. Like any corporation, the goal is money. He knows there’s money to be had from the right. He might be trying to get that tucker Carlson demo. Bringing in interesting guests like scientist, philosophers, etc. Just keeps the general public from leaving outright.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, I’m honestly guilty of it as well, I like some of the guests he has on their for their stories. Usually I just watch the little clips of them at most.

      • visak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s an attention whore. He says whatever gets him the most response but I think he’s sufficiently brain damaged to believe it in the moment, which is why he seems genuine.

    • Meldroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course he’s brain damaged, this is the kind of political discourse that comes from a.guy who gets kicked in the head for fun.