• branch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Those Ads at the beginning of legitimate copies of DVDS and movies, really bugged me, like why are you annoying the people who actually bought the product!? Also the people downloading stuff online seemed cool in those videos so I think the ads had the opposite effect a lot of the time.

  • pedestrian@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ai summary because it seems like folks aren’t reading the article:

    The study finds that threatening anti-piracy messages aimed at deterring digital piracy have the opposite effect on men, finding they increase piracy behaviors by 18% in men. However, such messages can reduce intended piracy in women by over 50%. The research also showed educational messages had no impact on intended piracy for both men and women. Notably, those with more favorable views of piracy saw even higher increases in intended piracy when exposed to threatening messages. The findings suggest anti-piracy groups should tailor their messages for different genders and consider alternative educational approaches to avoid unintended consequences like increasing piracy.

    Seems like threatening messages specifically drive piracy up in men, but not for women. If you have a favorable view on piracy then the aggressive ads make it more likely that you’ll follow through.

    It’s pretty much saying that the industry may want to reconsider the way they frame their warnings because it may actually be influencing people to take action.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If a paid streaming service give users a worse experience than pirating, that’s on them!

  • Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I actually spent time on ripping the ‘you wouldn’t steal…’ video from the first DVD that I had with it on it, just for the sheer irony. 😅

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m just waiting for that glorious day when I can, in fact, download a car.

    • Technically you can do so now. But you would need a metal 3D printer to build it (or make it out of plastic I guess). I remember reading something about a dude who bought a industrial 3D printer setup just so he could print out a Rolls Royce Phantom.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Printing the externals is doable today, though definitely expensive, simply from the volume of material needed, even if you can outsource or rent a big enough 3D printer (I’d probably print out of nylon powder or something similar)*.

        With the exterior printed, just slap an electric motor somewhere and you’re golden (after setting up the whole rest of the car, of course)

        *Actually, i’d probably print a neat looking bike frame and maybe some protection, way less material needed

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Make it easy for me to get the shit that I want and maybe I won’t pirate. It’s fucking easier to just pirate shit than to sign up for a bunch of services and deal with asscunt companies. Fuck you.

    • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. If there was a Spotify-like service for video where i could get 99.9% of all tv and movies of all time in one place without ads, then I’d be willing to pay like 40 bucks a month, maybe even 50. But since no video service is even remotely close to that, then i just pirate instead, which provides exactly that type of service, and costs zero dollars a month.

      • e_mc2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s one thing that’s preventing me from doing exactly that and that is, as a non-native English speaker with tinnitus, the constant struggle to find good subtitles that are properly synced. My lazy ass just wants to enjoy a movie at a normal volume without having to force myself to be super-focussed in order not to miss the whole goddamn plot of the movie.

      • Pfnic@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I find it interesting, how Spotify is often mentioned as the standard service because last time I used it, it struggled with similar issues as the video streaming platforms, that not every song I want to listen to is available

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Shit dude, give me access to most things I want to watch and most of the stuff I’ve forgotten about and that’s worth $50/month as a minimum.

        I’ve come full circle back to wearing an eye patch. I was using amazon, hulu, hbo and paramount, usually letting some lapse or pause to watch stuff on the other ones but they have all gone to shit. It’s impossible to find what you might be interested because just like netflix they show the same shows/movies in multiple categories and their search sucks ass plus they are all missing a ton of good shows.

        Now I am slowly downloading shows from the past that I don’t already have in my library and haven’t watched in years while I keep an eye out for new shows I might be interested in. I use showrss to auto download current shows that it has in its DB to a vps and I have sync setup to mirror it to my nas so I can stream it to my TV with vlc. So much easier than opening hulu, finding the show I want to catch up on, etc.

        • crossover@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve gone through the effort to build a 50terabyte media center. And am slowly filling it with tv shows, movies, and documentaries I like. It’s expensive and inconvenient. But still a fun hobby.

          But the reason I do it is because I can have everything in one spot. Easily accessible. I control it. Never going back.

          • rdyoung@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            This is the way. It’s just me who watches stuff off my nas and I’m fine with vlc so I don’t use plex or jellyfin or whatever. I have an old (at this point) qnap nas that I’ve been doing the same with. Mine is a total of 40tb’ish iirc. I definitely need to get a second nas and some more drives but for now what I have is enough though I am going to run out of space soonish.

      • noobnarski@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        And they also shouldnt require specific browsers and a CPU that is less than 2 years old to stream content in resolutions above 720p.

        Its not because its not possible, its because it lacks some bullshit copyright protection.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Trolls ripped me a new one for saying that. I hope they wont do the same to you. But yes I agree.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. It’s definitely stealing. This is a piracy community. Don’t feign moral superiority. They offer a product, you don’t want to buy the product so you find it for free elsewhere. A digital file that you experience for a cost is no different than a book you buy from a store, regardless of the state of ownership after the fact. And regardless if it’s a locally published author or a multi billion dollar studio, there’s a cost of entry. Semantics is all you’re arguing, not the legitimacy of piracy, when you share that copypasta.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        In this case, the phrase’s become more popular because people buy digital goods and, due to business shenanigans, they lose access to it, like buying a digital copy of a movie, “owning it”, then no longer being able to access it because Sony couldn’t be arsed to get the rights sorted out.

        There’s also the numerous situations where you can’t legally own media, simply because it’s not up for sale, like the vast majority of content on streaming sites. There’s no way to own and consume some media except through the provider. It’s still illegal, it’s still an unauthorized copy, but in this case, it’s the only way to “own” something.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Despite crappy licensing agreements and the tenuous relationship between consumers and ownership of a thing, finding a way to circumvent paying for a thing that is for sale in one form or another, is theft.

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Look man, I get that piracy isnt an ethically clean solution, but the current state of legal digital media is nowhere near ethically clean either, and I’m far more likely to root for a person than I am for a corporation. Especially since its because of corporations that the digital ownership sphere is so fucked

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            By that definition making coffee at home and taking it with you to work instead of buying is theft.

            Even further anytime you make a product or do a service yourself or get a free alternative (for example, open source software instead of a close-source alternative) instead of buying would be theft by that definition.

            That’s not the legal definition of “theft”, it’s not even the historical or common sense definition of “theft”, it’s some kind of neo-Capitalist Dystopia definition of “theft” that only makes sense if you’re starting from a foundation of there being a “right to make money”.

            • Jojo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              How dare you cook dinner for yourself when McDonald’s is right there? How will the franchise owners or the brand owners be able to buy meals for their children!?

      • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I will gladly take a position of moral superiority, because copyright has evolved from a very limited monopoly, intended to encourage creativity while balancing public access, into a licence for corporations to seek rent.

        So, call it stealing if you like, I will sleep well tonight regardless.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re taking a thing that costs money, for free. I don’t see how it’s anything other than stealing.

          If you go to a theme park, and they want $20 for you to enter, and you decide you don’t want to pay, you’ll be in violation of their rules. Those that did pay will leave the park at the end of the day with a great experience, but with no presumption of ownership of the park. This is analogous to piracy by copying a movie. You didn’t want to pay the entrance fee, so you found a way to have the same enjoyment for free. The people that paid for their media, however shitty the licensing agreement is, received the agreed upon service with no presumption of ownership.

          I’m not here to defend streaming services or crappy licensing deals, but to pretend that it’s not stealing, gaslighting everyone here into following your train of thought, is the definition of unearned moral superiority. You’re not entitled to free media.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s like refusing to pay the $20 park entrance fee and then making your own copy of the park in your backyard. Is that stealing $20 from the park?

            • Jojo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I mean it’s still possibly copyright and/or trademark infringement, but…

          • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The only theft going on is the ongoing theft from the public domain, due to corruption of copyright law by special interests enabled by law for hire. Your analogy is irrelevant as the marginal cost of operating a park for an extra visitor is not zero.

          • Iamdanno@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            He didn’t take the movie/music from them. They still have it. It still exists on their tape/film/drive. If you are going to argue, at least argue in good faith, with words that mean what you are trying to say.

      • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Theft” has a legal definition that at least in my jurisdiction is not met by downloading copyrighted materials. So, no, copying is not stealing.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Actually, even if you are an EU citizen, downloading copywritten material for free is very much considered theft. Ever read those FBI or Interpol statements at the beginning of films?

          • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You are wrong. You are talking about copyright infringement, which is a civil matter and not a criminal one. That means the party whose rights have been infringed must prove that and sue you. But you won’t go to jail if convicted, you’ll have to pay damages. That’s why the Netherlands, for example, used to be safe for torrenting. It wasn’t legal, but copyright holders did not have the right to get account details from providers for IP addresses that were caught sharing content (sharing, not downloading) and thus had no one to sue. If it were a criminal matter, the state would be after you and they have a lot more rights.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s legally called “Copyright Infrigement” and it’s not even part of Criminal Law in most Legal Jurisdictions, unlike Theft.

            You’re talking off your arse so hard that by now you must hovering on your own farts.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not stealing unless you delete the original when you download it. It’s forgery at best

    • ccdfa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I can’t find it now, but there was that one text post that went something like “1. Copying a movie costs the studio money, 2. Download a movie, 3. Make 1000 copies, 4. Studio goes bankrupt”

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I saw one where it went:

        • Publish a copyrighted work
        • Sell it for 10 bucks
        • Have a friend pirate it 100 million times
        • Declare bankruptcy
        • Have the friend delete his copies
        • You’re a billionaire now
  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    i remember when valve’s steam completely killed nearly all video game piracy just by existing

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      To the point where a lot of gamers have paid for more games than they’d ever have time to play.

      • Sebastrion@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hey… I only have 600 Steam Games and i don’t remember half of them… But don’t worry, I will play them, after Dragons Dogma 2 and the Elden Ring DLC of course.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          After I’m finished doing the same shit over and over again for another 7-800 hours in warframe I’m sure I’ll get around to playing some of the games I actually paid money for.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      And Spotify pretty much killed music piracy . Although you could argue they just changed who did the robbing

    • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the truth man, I will even buy games on Steam that I’ve pirated in the past with no intention of playing them again. We all largely stopped pirating movies and TV for almost a decade when the streaming experience was superior.

      If there was a steam like service for movies and tv and music that worked on all my platforms I would pay for it just like I paid for a home server running the *arrs.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      There was a golden age of Netflix where I basically stopped pirating movies and TV too.

      Now streaming is a fragmented ad-ridden nightmare and I pirate more than ever before. It’s not like it’s free either, I pay for a VPN, disk storage, let alone the time and maintenance.

      If I could buy (and actually own) high quality digital copies of movies/tv with no bullshit at a reasonable price that would be a serious value proposition that would beat out the hassles that come along with piracy.

      • noyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fully agree. Why is renting a movie the same cost as a month of some random subscription service? Then you also get a copy you can only watch for like 24 hours. If you “buy” you still dont get access to the file, just some digital copy that can be taken away at any point.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean I always knew digital renting was kind of a lame idea, but I didn’t realize until you said how monumentally bad it is…

        • Toribor@corndog.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I don’t think Steam’s business model works well for Movies/TV. Besides delivering the game files after your initial purchase Steam also continues to host and deliver update files for games over time, as well as lots of extras like syncing game saves, the workshop for mods, etc. I like having a centralized service that offers these features and acts a launcher for games because it’s very convenient. These features are a huge value add that makes the service very attractive over piracy.

          But for Movies/TV the main thing I want is the ability to watch the content, at a high quality, on whatever device I want, whenever I want to watch it. Theoretically this shouldn’t be to hard, but with the way all the rights work it’s effectively impossible for any streaming service to offer this. Content gets removed all the time, it’s spread across a ton of different services that all offer a different experience. In a vain attempt to thwart pirates it’s a pain in the ass to watch content offline so it’s unreliable at best.

          The only way to get the experience I want with Movies/TV is to pirate the content.