• marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    those first 3 months or so of covid were bliss. every office drone was off the road. it was so fucking easy to get everywhere, and it was quick too

    • The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It was mostly quicker on my pushbike too. I wasnt having to keep swerving and braking for idiots. Though I did get chased 3 times, by special kinds of idiots (one in a dinosaur suit ffs).

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    None of my coworkers drive to the office and we actually like seeing each other… Hybrid remote work is great for us

    I think 90% of the problem is people being forced to drive everywhere

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Traffic would be so much better with a staggered work force. We might actually enjoy the commute.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because of traffic, the workforce started staggering by themselves here if possible. The result was that bad traffic was spread out over the entire day instead of just two peaks in the morning and evening. Good traffic is only at night and working at night defeats the purpose of having business hours.

        • ECB@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Basically just further proof that car traffic doesn’t scale well. It’s just an incredibly space inefficient way to get around.

    • squid_slime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Another factor is the spaces that offices take up or the power used whilst unoccupied, these space could be used for housing or maybe even industry.

      Its great that no one drives to your work but this is more uncommon than common.

      In conclusion: work from home is better.

  • voracitude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Well, having the office was nice because I like my colleagues. I’m lucky in that regard though, and as nice as it was to socialise at work, working from home is nicer. Not to mention much much cheaper by every metric. In conclusion fuck ever going back to the office, thank you for coming to my TEDx Talk.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I personally like it too, but not daily. I average 1-2 days in office now and it’s healthy for me. See my coworkers, they know my name, we catch up, have our meetings, then I go home for a few days again. I’ve just learned everyone is different, and the company definitely shouldn’t be telling people how to work, people are grownups and can decide themselves. (And if they can’t, then fire them instead of punishing everyone).

      However for this meme, another great way to get people off the roads would be… trains

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Some people don’t have the space at home to set up a working area and really want to just go to an office that their employer pays for, and that’s fine.

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This is why coworking spaces exist.

          I don’t know in other countries but it is working quite well in France, you can get a subscription to the closest working space and have a desk, meeting rooms … To work remotely.

          I like that it gives a separation between home and work but without long commute.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This, and I do a lot of gaming on my pc, have a nice setup etc, usually not great trying to work there (don’t have space for another desk and can’t really justify having two sets of monitors, keyboard etc

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why do you need all that? I have my work laptop sitting at the back of my desk. Most monitors have two inputs. I’ve got an older 1080 with HMDI+DVI and a newer 1440p with DP/2xHDMI.

            So I have the laptop in HDMI on both screens (it needed a USBC to HDMI cable for one of the outputs), and a simple USB3 switch for the mouse+keyboard.

            So when I’m working I fire up the laptop, switch the USB over to that and swap the screens to the HDMI inputs. When I’m done working I can fire up the desktop, swap inputs and USB and in seconds I’m switched over.

            I’ve been doing it this way for years and years now.

            • flashgnash@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s normally what I do, the problem is the context for me, I sometimes prefer just sitting across the room with a laptop so I’m in a slightly different environment

              • r00ty@kbin.life
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                It can help draw a line I’d agree, but I’ve gotten used to it now I think. I used to have it worse. I operated out of the bedroom for the first few years I was remote and that wasn’t good at all. The new house had a bedroom that was really too small to be a bedroom. So it became an office room.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Passenger trains can only operate efficiently in areas of extremely high population density. If I’m living somewhere serviced by trains, then everywhere I go, I’ll be in a crowd.

              I’m enough of an introvert that this sounds like an extraordinarily uncomfortable proposition. I’d need an exorbitant financial benefit to even consider it, and that’s not going to happen. Instead, I’m expected to pay a very high premium for the “privilege” of being miserable everywhere I go.

              No thanks, I’ll stay out here in the sticks.

              • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re absolutely spot on, and it’s evidenced by house prices here in the UK where they’re next to or near a rail line.

                They are noisy fuggers and people do not like living by them.

          • ECB@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Small towns built around a train station are absolutely lovely though

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I suspect those are mostly outposts. Rail junctions. Water stops for the old steam trains. Remote mining towns. Places that either provided services to railway operation, or primarily needed freight service rather than passenger.

              And I agree: I would love to live in a small railroad town. But I would move out long before that town had enough people to justify commuter rail service.

  • Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly I think we’re going to hit a wall where we realize we need about half as many “office drones” as we have in a couple years.

    So many people with office jobs drive in, sit at a desk, and do maybe 2 hours of actual work in the entire day. Or they work from home and do the same. And then they collect their 95k/year salary.

    I really dunno if people are prepared for businesses to start going “wait, what are all of these people doing?” And axing their workforce and replacing most of them with AI or existing other employees

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      or you could let everyone work half as many hours for the same pay, but sure why should anyone except business owners get to benefit 🙄

      • Minotaur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That would be hard to balance around all the people who actually do work 8-12 hours a day

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The thing you’re not accounting for is that work that primarily involves thought, which is what “office drones” are doing, aren’t productive in the same way that physical or service jobs are.
      Looking off into space thinking is part of the work. People average about four hours of productive work in an eight hour day.

      The thing you can’t do is get rid of half the people and then expect the other half to magically be eight hours productive per day. Businesses keep trying and weirdly it just tanks their output.

      AI is not the panacea that so many people think it is. Do you feel happy when you need help with something you bought and you get an AI trying to offer you helpful articles or tips? I don’t. Do you want the same level of service from the entity that controls where your paycheck gets deposited or fixed your HSA contributions?

      If you definition of work is butts in chairs typing, office workers don’t do too much work. But that’s a very naive definition of what most office workers are actually doing.

      • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The thing you’re not accounting for is that work that primarily involves thought, which is what “office drones” are doing

        Found the office drone.

        Our office drones are not “thinking” for half the day like you, and input and manipulate data. You could also include half these “managers” too who sit in an office sending emails all day, and never hit the shop floor.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If it is so easy to be an office drone, why weren’t you able to get a job like that?

          Is it maybe because it involves skills you aren’t aware of?

          • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I once worked in an office doing what I described above.

            I absolutely hated it stuck in a cubicle, and now work outside with lots of other people grafting, instead of listening to gossiping over the cubicles all day long. Think I lasted 2 months.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Given that office drone would cover any job that isn’t service, manufacturing or laborer, it’s not exactly surprising that you’d find one. I’m a software developer.

          It’s almost always best to assume that other people’s jobs actually take some form of skill, because they always do. People get paid for a reason. Otherwise you fall into the trap of calling huge swaths of work “unskilled labor” and thinking they don’t deserve much pay, just because they’re just moving stuff around on the shop floor.

          What do you think those emails the managers are sending are, if not work?

            • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The old; how do you know someone is a software developer? Yup, they tell ya!

              I think I really touched a nerve with that guy though, and it seems like they want to be an office drone instead of working from home (this is the bit where the “senior software devs + team manager” argue they need to collaborate, in person) with a nice life balance.

          • Ashe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You don’t understand though, because it’s not physical (software of any kind) and even if it is (any hardware) because you aren’t constantly doing something it’s not work!!

            As an admin who got push back from the sales team, everyone has… Unique perspectives on what is and isn’t work.

          • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I know exactly what those emails are because I have to deal with them asking me if a wagon that I’m looking at has arrived yet.

            So I email them back telling them that it’s arrived (they knew that already because goods-in already updated the checking in sheet) and they get to validate their job somehow by asking me, shit.

            It’s quite amazing how they keep their jobs.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              So you can dismiss someone’s job because you, a person whose job it is to look at wagons, got an email you didn’t see the point of?

              If they have the sheet, why do they need you to work there and look at the wagon at all?

              Now, I know your job definitely has more to it than looking at wagons and confirming their existence.
              My point is that the person who sent the email does too. It’s rare for a job to actually have no point and no work associated with it.

              • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Well, maybe your workplace wouldn’t put up with these people but I can confirm that besides them not being able to use SAP to check the quantity of a BOM, to like I said - they have access to the other functions / data but prefer to delegate them to others.

                So it ends up going down a hierarchy until someone else does what these managers could do themselves in the first instance.

                • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  And they spend all their time forwarding these queries to people lower down the hierarchy and that’s all they do, eh?

                  You should probably get a new job if your company has that much dead weight and no direction.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Experimental solution proposal:

          • Fire all management. They’re expensive and exponentially less productive. Their stupid large offices and pricey desks also waste space.

          • (Office) workers collectively do the thing they do without being micro managed and stuffed into pointless meetings.

          • ???

          • Probably profit, actually. But then how would the “in-club” kids reap all the rewards without working? :( :( :(

          • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I have direct experience with the management that only work days since I work continental hours, so get to see how we run during the night without them.

            Like I said, half is probably a number we could run with at my place. Sorry state of affairs.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d be fine with going into the office if public transportation could get me there, but it’s a 15 minute drive vs 1.5 hours on the bus. And when I go into the office I just put in headphones with a YouTube documentary and don’t talk to anyone. What’s the point?

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Meanwhile, my lead, who insists I drive 40km which takes 70 minutes one way:

    “I can’t do teams meetings for design discussions, I don’t like drawing with my mouse”

    Me: “OK, get a Wacom tablet or wtv and draw with that?”

    Him: “No, just come to the office” for our 5 min talks we have occasionally and the once every two weeks 1 hr discussion

  • Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If my company forces me into the office then my commute shall be counted towards the company’s “carbon footprint”, not mine

  • renzev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s hypocrisy all the way down. Microsoft is telling people to run their 144hz screens at 60hz to save the planet while sending thousands of good computers to the landfill with their stupid TPM requirements. Never believed this “carbon footprint” garbage, never will. You are the carbon that they want to reduce.

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The worst part of it is most big companies are forcing RTO to either justify the leases they don’t want to pay to break, or to satisfy tax incentives agreements they made with municipalities.

      In both cases, they’re deciding it’s better if you pay - in time, gas, car maintenance, mental health, productivity, and stress - for their business decisions that went bad instead of paying money out of their own bloated pockets.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Here’s my theory: bad bosses want you to be there in person because they think you’re lazy.

    My old job: there was a constant cloud of mistrust I got when I worked there, just a feeling of unease. I can’t really describe it. Like everyone was just a little bit unhappy with their job. It wasn’t related to the work we were doing, it was the working conditions. Everyone seemed unhappy with some policy. I consistently heard bickering about management and idiotic decisions, plus the usual customer complaints about clients making bad decisions or doing ridiculous things, but that’s normal and nobody seemed miffed about it, just discussing it.

    They had a “hybrid” work setup, each person was “allowed” to work remotely one day of the week, each week. The selection of which day was up to each worker and their team/manager to schedule. The expectation was that someone would be in office at all times on every team. Most teams were 3-4 people, so it generally meant that only one person was working remotely at a time.

    So let me compound this, and I’ll note, there’s no exaggeration here, this is what happened. While working, we were obligated to be in a teams meeting all day long, 9 times out of 10 it was expected that we were on cam the entire day. Frequently these teams meetings were only the team in question, but the justification was that we were in there in case a manager/team leader/whatever, could pop in and talk to the team if they needed to, and/or if the manager was working remotely. It was pretty rare that happened. The other excuse was so that the team could chat about challenges and discuss any client issues they needed to collaborate on, which most teams just used text chat to do, so the meeting was unnecessary. During my time there, I made several suggestions for improvements and they all fell on deaf ears. Nothing changed. The excuses were poor, and I don’t recall them very clearly because they were largely nonsense. Needless to say, the situation sucked.

    I had to drive into the office for about 1h+ each day, and at least the same coming home, so around 2.5h of my day was my commute. I pleaded for more work from home/remote, but it was denied at every turn. Add this to the fact that there was no company provided parking, and parking in that area started at about $70/mo, and went up from there. The nearest parking areas were the most costly at $130+ and they were in high demand, some had wait lists for monthly passes because they simply did not have enough parking spots for everyone that wanted them.

    There were probably dozens of other frustrations I could list, I’ll limit myself to one more: my job is IT support, and we largely use remote access software for everything, so it literally does not matter where I work from. As long as I have an internet connection, I can do my job.

    I didn’t last 2 years under those conditions. I barely made it to 1 year… There’s a whole story as to why I don’t work there anymore, but it’s not relevant to the point. My point is, I was untrusted, and treated as though I should just shut up and create value for the shareholders, and be happy about it. By the way, the shareholders were the managers.

    Contrast with the place I’m working now: I’m provided with $1000 of home office set up funds up front. I have a home office already set up, but I found some nice-to-have things that I was able to get with that money. I was shipped a brand new laptop and dock, which the old place gave me a used, old, crappy, end of life/end of support system. They also provided me with a UPS, keyboard, mouse, and three monitors, webcam, headset, etc. Before I even worked my first shift, all shipped to me directly. This job is 100% work from home, and this workplace doesn’t even have an official office space. The only exception is when hands-on is required, or there’s a team event, and we take over a client’s board room for a day, so we can work from there, which has been less than once a month. I’ve met my team in person exactly twice in the three+ months I’ve worked at this place.

    Any suggestions I have are discussed and considered. I feel heard. Some suggestions have already been implemented, others are still under consideration or have been denied with good reasons (usually a technical limitation regarding the systems we use). I don’t need to sit in on useless meetings all day that accomplish nothing, I can listen to music while I get things done without being distracted by my co-workers eating their lunch and forgetting to hit mute. I “see” my team once a day for a stand up to check in on progress and workload. I feel supported, trusted, and I’m free to work in whatever conditions I find are most condusive to getting things done.

    As a matter of fact: both jobs require time tracking, the old job I struggled to account for ~5 hrs of my 8 hour shift, at the new job, I frequently can account for ~7 hours of my day without issue.

    My boss is good, trusting, and friendly. Compared to the cloud of discontent my old boss would inspire, and the work shows through on that. I’m happier, and I enjoy work again.

    I recently heard that the old job nixed hybrid and went full RTO.

    QED: Good bosses trust that you’ll do your job and let you do that from wherever you can. Bad bosses want to control you into doing it “their way or the highway”.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The reason good bosses can trust you is that they can quantify your output. Bad bosses just assume an ass in a seat is getting something done.

      This is part of the reason sales positions are often the only WFH positions at a company. Their metrics are clear and easily quantifiable, so if someone’s not doing their job you can tell.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s micromanaging. They don’t know how to lead properly. When I went through McDonald’s shift manager training they taught the concept of letting your workers do their job, so you could do yours. They literally said to work with your hands in your pockets so that you wouldn’t be tempted to take over and get distracted by going back to what you used to do. A Managers job is to provide their team with whatever they need to do their job effectively. A baseball coach wouldn’t go out on the field and bat or play the outfield.

      That manager probably started off doing the job you were doing and got promoted by kissing ass or being a toxic worker and therefore causing everyone else to leave/ perform lower because they were avoiding that person.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They literally said to work with your hands in your pockets so that you wouldn’t be tempted to take over and get distracted

        Yeah this is my experience with managers, alright. When they weren’t around, the actual work to be done always seemed to go just fine! Happy worker anarchy!

        My supervisor’s role in various jobs I’ve had was usually to hang out in their back office or chat up other management -level staff all day. Occasionally opening Excel and punching in some numbers once a week. Not to mention the hard labor of scheming up something they could neg you about so you’d feel pushed to make them look better.

        That manager probably started off doing the job you were doing and got promoted by kissing ass or being a toxic worker

        This. The company will promote its “true believers” who think shift-managing a MickeyD’s is their life’s plateau, who will take the company line as sacred gospel and punish any whiff of potential heresy.

        Provide what their workers need? Maybe it was this way at one point. I feel the role of manager now is the job of an idiot task-master, to convince their employees to work harder without what they need.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I will add that the best manager I ever reported to, always took on things that impeded my ability to do work. If a client was being rude or unreasonable, I would shoot him a note about it and he would usually tell me to drop it and move on, that he would deal with the problem… And he did.

          I’d take a job under him again in a heartbeat.

          Thanks Jeff, you’re awesome.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In that case, the management was basically the founders. They grew the business without any employees, and when it came time to bring on employees, instead of stepping back and letting the employees figure out the best way to get their job done, they’ve rigidly enforced their work methodology on their employees. When you deviate, they get unhappy.

        That specific company was a bit of an outlier, the majority shareholder “brags” that he has fired more people than… I don’t remember, I couldn’t have given less of a shit when he said that. I was busy trying to keep my eyes from rolling out of my head. But that’s literally something he said to me in person, with nobody else in the room. Needless to say, that company is shit for more reasons than controlling management.

        Needless to say I was already starting to look for the exit after being there for less than a year.

        I can’t really talk about why I am no longer employed there, but I can confirm that I did not, at any point, provide two weeks notice as required by law when quitting. Beyond that, my lawyer advises me not to discuss it.

        Needless to say, I’m thankful that I’m not working there anymore.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hey boss, you want to put these servers in the cloud?

    Oh and by the way, me working from home is the human equivalent of working in the cloud.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s somebody else’s server (clouds) and somebody else’s office (yours instead of theirs)

  • Fr0G@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I worry that the widespread acceptance of work from home without any other societal changes will increase the level of loneliness. It’s a solution that has to come packaged with other quality of life enhancements or social trust is going into an even faster free fall. I wonder what a wfh/social solution would look like

      • Fr0G@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most of the social gatherings I’ve been to have been set up with coworkers. Maybe I was conditioned by the American education system but I don’t think I’ve ever made a friend outside of a place that we both were expected to go to consistently. I’m not very familiar with constructs outside of that if I’m honest.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In theory if you have a circle of friends already, then social should be better with WFH because when it is quitting time you are immediately done and have more evening for social gatherings. if you recently moved cities before WFH, not having colleages might cut down chances of finding new friend groups

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You have potentially two or more hours added to your day for socializing.

      Get lunch nearby, go to the park, do stuff in the evening.

      If you’re too isolated physically that speaks to urban sprawl and car dependency more than wfh imo

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s going to result in the wholesale exportation of white collar jobs overseas. It’s already underway.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have only ever had stressful social interaction at work, except for my current job where I’m generally the only one there and as long as I’m within budget whatever I say goes. That is to say the only non stressful job I have done is the one that is 99% just me with no other people and I only even need to be there because it’s physical work, the odd clerical thing is done from home on a phone work profile.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve been working from home for over 15 years now. One thing I do not miss is the “social” aspect of the office.

      • Fr0G@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s fair, my coworkers are really the only people I talk to. I don’t know how to make friends as an adult honestly. I don’t think I’m the only one in this boat

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s an issue, but it’s not an issue for your job to solve for you, especially not when “solving” it would negatively impact the rest of the coworkers who prefer the benefits of WFH.

          The most common advice I’ve seen about stuff like that is to get involved in hobbies that have clubs or groups that meet in your free time. You can try out new things or join a club about stuff you’re already interested in, and you’ll meet people doing stuff that you’re interested in and sometimes they can become your friends.