• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oracle is a law firm with a large IT department.

    They’ve been giving us shit because they “see downloads from our IP addresses”. It’s an absolute shake-down operation. They let anybody download their poisoned jvm for free and then tell your company that they now owe them a fortune.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        We’d love to but we do have some legitimate needs for it since Oracle software requires their jvm. It’s a massive pain in the ass.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You didn’t seem to understand. Oracle only supports their own jvm when running their software that uses Java (e.g. weblogic).

              • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                It’s not about functionality. When you’re paying for licensing and support you need to use supported versions of things. If you call up about an issue with the database and you’re running an unsupported os or Java version they hang up on you.

            • Abnorc@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I know it may not be an easy question to answer, but does your company really owe them money? I’m guessing that their other software that uses their JVM also has a license, so they should be more clear about the company having to license out the JVM in order to use it. This sounds like a scam that comes packaged along with some other software.

              • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Oh - sorry, Oracle offers a free “entitlement” to use the JVM when used with their software if it’s required. We don’t pay extra for the Oracle JVM.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fairly sure that in that case it would actually be more cost effective to just rewrite the application.

      • decivex@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        In most cases they could probably switch to OpenJDK without losing anything whatsoever.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Ever since I looked up “java download” and had to go through the horrible process on the Oracle site, I decided that they didn’t want me to download Java so I should avoid it, and that has always proved to be a good decision

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        My employer has a pretty large presence in AWS. We finished migrating to Amazon’s Corretto (based on openjdk) months ago. It was pretty painless given we already use Amazon’s Linux distros.

    • farcaller@fstab.sh
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      So here’s the thing. This year I fell in love wih clojure, it’s an absolute pleasure to program in. It’s also a hosted language that runs on java (primarily) or javascript (or a bunch of marginalized things). And honestly, I feel like I can make the java backend run more resource-effecient than the JS one.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The memory hog JVM and Dalvik on Android both need to go tbh.

    Even if you can use OpenJDK or Kotlin as an upgrade, Go has shown a much better system with selective memory control which is easy to implement.

    Or Rust if you want all the performance.

  • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oracle quoted us 30K because a small handful of our users needed to use a .jnlp application. It took me a couple of days but I got it working with Corretto and a program called OpenWebStart.

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It feels like actual innovation in all sectors has slowed to a crawl, and corporations – especially the ones run by MBA parasites – are concentrating more and more on just squeezing money out of people with various bullshit tactics, while at the same time thinning their workforce (naturally the MBAs are never under threat, though)

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      We’re at the end-times for western capitalism, where rent-seeking has become the primary driver of markets. It’s happening all around us.

    • Laser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oracle was never really innovative on a technical level , it’s first and foremost a company focused on selling licenses, and they’re really innovative in that regard but if you fall for that as a company, I have no pity, this is their whole schtick.

      Big companies in general are often rather conservative in nature while innovation happens on smaller scale and later expands.

      The big problem is rather that a lot of innovation has been absorbed by the big companies via buyouts, especially when money was cheap to borrow. Innovation bears risk, buying an established solution and milking existing users much less so.

      I don’t think the users are without blame. A lot of people ignore the red flags when a solution is just convenient enough (we need the commercial support / this exactly covers our use case so we don’t have to hire someone to adapt it / …) and the vendor then cashes out when moving away from his solution would be really expensive.

      I think there’s still a lot of innovation lately, but a lot people are just looking for the next big thing that does everything it feels like.

      • bamfic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        oracle did not develop java. it was developed at sun, which oracle then bought

        • Laser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Alright, not that I wrote or implied that anywhere… In fact Java was probably the whole reason Oracle bought Sun to gain leverage over Android. Which fits very much into what I wrote - one company innovates, another one buys them to squeeze users (Google wasn’t a customer of Sun, they used their own implementation which wasn’t exactly Java but also not exactly anything else). Just that Sun by all means wasn’t a small company, I mean they controlled almost a full stack with their own processors (SPARC), workstations and servers (Blade was somewhat famous), an operating system with Solaris (and if you want to count it even JavaOS) and Java on top of those, and they contributed a lot of technology like NFS, ZFS (license discussions aside). On the other hand, when they bought someone, the product wasn’t just milked to death, but actually integrated into their stack and continued to be developed in the open.

          Shame it turned out that way, I guess Sun was a bit overleveraged with how much they did vs. how much they made from it. And to think that Oracle paid less than a fifth than what Twitter sold for later for all of that technology to go to waste, just for a chance to sue Google… But we long as suits continue to license their stuff because they have cool advertisements at airports, this will keep going.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The big problem is rather that a lot of innovation has been absorbed by the big companies via buyouts

        Which ultimately does seem to lead to innovation slowing down. The big players buy out any potential smaller competitors, and very often just outright kill the products / services they inherited in the acquisition.

      • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I was a developer at Oracle. We got handed down sales goals. ??? It was a running joke in our org that oracle is a sales company and we just scramble to make what they’re selling. When I left half our org had been laid off or left. Only got two raises in the 5 years I was there. Not worth.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oracle was never really innovative on a technical level

        Even their RDBMS and SQL was copied from ideas that came from IBM. And I recall either E. F. Codd or one of the SQL guys making a remark about Oracle’s less-than-saviour sales tactics, even back in the 90s.

    • bc93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      no, they’re completely unrelated, some devs liked the name java and put it into the name of the new language they were working on, nothing beyond that

      • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, I know that – I honestly want them both to die :p

        Both have been a blight on software development for decades.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t have a problem with Java, and you can get Oracle free versions of Java.

          JavaScript on the other hand is a blight as you say.

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, for a short time there the word ‘java’ was very ‘in’. Marketing hipsters at the time wanted to use it in everything, just like the word ‘AI’ now.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        ECMA by Ecma?

        Ahh, needed Wiki:

        It acquired its current name in 1994, when the European Computer Manufacturers Association (ECMA) changed its name to reflect the organization’s global reach and activities. As a consequence, the name is no longer considered an acronym and no longer uses full capitalization.

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      As it says on AdoptOpenJDK page, the project has rebranded to Adoptium.

      I use Adoptium on Windows (dunno, seems to run Minecraft, OK, that’s good enough for me). On Linux I just use whatever OpenJDK is packaged in distro.