The simplicity of it is logic defying. It used to be that you had to find crosswalks or move puzzle pieces or type blurred letters and numbers, but NOW all the sudden I can just click a box and HEY!, I’m human?

That’s hardly the Turing Test I’d expected.

  • NightEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Clicking the button doesn’t proof that you are a human. All the checks happen way before you even click the button (or sometimes even before visiting the website). Google also offers a similar button for their users and since cloudflare is also used on almost any website, they have a lot of data about you. They check your cookies, browser agent, device, settings, your IP address, if you use a VPN or proxy, etc. If you visited other cloudflare websites in the past with the same device or IP, and so on. So they know you and your device way before you even click the button. This is also the reason why you sometimes see a robot arm (made of Lego) clicking the button, and is still recognized as human. But as soon as you use a different IP address or a VPN (or even use a shared IP address, like in your company’s network) you have to solve CAPTCHAs. Of course they also check mouse movement, but this is only one part of many checks.

  • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It tests whether your mouse movement looks human–we’re really bad at things like moving in straight lines, so it’s pretty evident from a mouse movement log whether you’re a human or a simple bot. It also takes a bunch of auxiliary browser/environment data into account. It’s not perfect, but it’s complicated enough to defeat to provide fine protection against cheap spam.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Interesting that my mouse movement is available to anyone who wants it.

      It seems like a small step from that to accessing my keyboard.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They can only access it while you’re focused on their webpage. CORS is all about that.

        If you click off to another web page and enter information or type of password into a secondary app they can’t gather that. As soon as they lose focus they lose the ability to capture your data.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nbd, but it sounds like you’re talking about encapsulation of event capture (viewport stops receiving events after losing focus).

          CORS is a protocol for client-side enforcement of a server-side security policy. It ensures that a resource request (e.g. “my-totally-safe-resource.wasm”) only loads from a location your server permits (e.g. “my-valid-origin.biz”, “friends-valid-origin.org”, etc).

      • whoareu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is a lot of other data available to sites you visit unless you are using some kind of fingerprint protection

      • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you’re using a webpage JavaScript can see your mouse cursor and anything you type. But only if the browser has focus. So if you’re typing in another window it can’t

      • Shadow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your mouse movement on that page is. Just like if you typed into the page.

        It’s not tracking you in other windows and apps.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your mouse movement and keyboard events are available to webpages that you’ve loaded, when the browser window is focused.

        This isn’t nefarious - it allows websites to build nice UIs that most people enjoy using, most of the time.

        There’s lots of shady stuff going on in browsers, this isn’t really one of them.

            • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Like those sites that ask me to sign in using Google (or other options) and then Google asks me for the password?

              Pretty easy to grab passwords I think.

              • naticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                To clarify, websites can’t capture keyboard events that were typed into a different website like you’re thinking. Think of going to a web game that let’s you use WASD for controlling your character. It’s able to capture those events on that page because its in focus. When a site goes out of focus (such as switching tabs or switching to another window that’s not the browser), it loses that ability. Overall, it’s very secure.

                I was more wondering how you thought capturing the mouse movements would lead to security issues.

              • howrar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Those websites send you directly to Google, so they no longer have control of the web page when you’re entering your password.

              • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                This is why Google sign-in can’t be embedded and uses the password input type for the password type. Most SSOs do this as well.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, how do you think websites work? Of course your mouse and keyboard events are available, otherwise you wouldn’t be able to interact with a website at all.

            • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This was the slap on the head I needed. I now get what you mean by interact with my keyboard. In other words = can tell what I’m typing. Like perfectly normal function of websites.

              I didn’t understand the “focus” party and how it helped. I think I said earlier, I’m not particularly smart.

    • Vince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Couldn’t I just record my mouse movements clicking on it a couple dozen times and randomly replay one of those recordings?

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My question is how is it not trivial to add a noise wave or some shit to the bot path? Obviously, I have zero technical knowledge of how bots, pathing, or anti-bot analysis works

      • nick@campfyre.nickwebster.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It uses other signals too, like what other sites you’ve visited with that checkbox on it, what CloudFlare has seen your IP address doing in the past, etc.

        The google one is able to see if you’re logged into a google account and take that into account.

        There’s even a new variant of the Google captcha that is invisible and doesn’t even bother to show a checkbox.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This feels only partially accurate. I’m a web developer, and I know websites don’t track all of what you suggest. Can you clarify, or come clean on what actually takes place?

      Honestly, I doubt it… I’m sorry. I don’t mean to be abrasive.

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Shitty situation if you are used to using hotkeys and only use mouse cursor when no other means are available by moving it using numpad.

      • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah that’s different as well. What they are filtering out is

        • a mouse teleporting to the exact center of the checkbox
        • a mouse smoothly gliding in a straight line to the center if the checkbook
        • a mouse traveling in a straight line to the center of the checkbook with some momentary stutters to add noise

        Et cetera. Humans are much noiser than anything a python script will spit out. Of course there are ways to get around this, like recording and reenacting a human mouse movement, but the point of any capcha system is to make it significantly more difficult to bot, not impossible.

        • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          No OP was right. If the reCaptcha is on the same page as a login, and I use my password manager to fill the fields, I fail the reCaptcha almost every time. I have to manually paste in the user name and password separately to slow things down to act more human…

      • Thorry84@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If it’s in doubt it just gives you extra challenges. So in the end everybody will get there, or not and then fuck you I guess.

        • s3p5r@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Some provide screen-reader instructions, but most places barely remember blind people exist. It’s another example of people with disabilities being ignored and marginalised.

          And then even if they do remember blind people exist, they probably forget there are people who aren’t blind who can’t do their tests for other reasons, like dyslexia or dexterity impairments.

          And then you have hCaptcha who makes disabled people to sign up to their database to use their cookie.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve learned from these that I must definitely move my mouse like a robot since it always asks me to do more puzzles afterwards. This is even if I try jiggling it around after clicking just to try and convince it.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Clicking percision and reaction time are still measurable and the checkbox can fall back to other captcha tactics if it has low faith in the user.

      • brianorca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s also checking your other traffic. (Since Cloudflare handles traffic for so many companies.) Are you visiting other sites in a realistic fashion, or are you doing 99% of your traffic trying to do one thing over and over.

  • brian@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    some of them are also less bot detection and more spam limiting and mitigation. cloudflare’s has more stuff built in I’m sure, but things like mCapcha are just proof of work, so if you’re trying to make a bunch of accounts or whatever, it’s really computationally expensive.

    • Black_Mald_Futures [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re literally using captchas to train AI, that’s why you have to identify 50 ffucking bicycles and fire hydrants sometimes. I’m pissed off at all the fucking free work I’ve had to do just to log in to shit

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s actually detecting you using emotion and aging. That’s the real test…

  • xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cloudflare has a bot score. Depending on how sus your bot score is you can use several different levels of verification. The checkbox you refer to is kind of in the middle. There is also a more complicated intrusive captcha and a totally transparent javascript. It’s a pretty slick system.

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Don’t mix tor plus VPN.

        If you’re using tor browser without tor for some reason, carry on.

          • cadekat@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            There are two ways to layer a VPN and tor:

            1. Tor over VPN; or
            2. VPN over Tor.

            In the first option, you gain little. Tor already encrypts your traffic, so your ISP can’t see inside them. Technically, Tor over a VPN hides the fact that you’re using Tor from your ISP, but Tor’s snowflake does something similar if you need that.

            In the second option, you’re revealing your VPN account information, which could theoretically be associated back to you. Tor adds nothing over just a VPN in this case.

            • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              So really, “no value in mixing,” which is distinct from “don’t mix.”

              The latter implies a security risk could be created.

              • nyxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                A security risk is created, you’re creating a permanent guard node by using your VPN with TOR. A lot of people downplay how serious this can be against a dedicated attacker. Sure, it may not matter for most, but for those with the right threat model, it will.

  • Mambert@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Basically bots would automatically click on it, teleporting the cursor to the very center of the button. They will do this within exact milliseconds of the page loading.

    Humans read something on the site, then find the banner, and move the cursor over to it, confirm that the cursor is somewhere on the button, and then click it.

    It’s not just the button, it’s the before the button that determines you’re a bot or not.

  • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A side to this is that certain techniques will be deliberately obfuscated or simply omitted as a security measure in the hopes of slowing a bad actor’s eventual bypassing of the measure. It’s an arms race and if the intruder doesn’t know what all the locks even are, it takes longer to break or pick them.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Humans have mouse movement that, on August 8, 2024, are very hard to reproduce. But just like regular captchas we are just teaching computers to do the same thing.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Proof of work, which becomes computationally expensive to scale, along with other heuristics based on your browser and page interaction. I believe it’s less about clicking the box and what happens after you’ve clicked the box.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I believe it’s less about clicking the box and what happens after you’ve clicked the box.

      I think it’s before, not after.

    • SerotoninSwells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is correct. I work in bot detections. There are baseline checks for various browser automation used as bot frameworks like Puppeteer or Playwright. Then there is basic analysis of server side and client side fingerprints; meaning, do the fingerprints you claim make sense. There are other heuristics too and I imagine Cloudflare is monitoring movements that point to automation. All of this happens after you click. I personally prefer this over Google’s captcha which frequently doesn’t recognize me as a human but is easily bypassed by bots.

  • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    https://blog.cloudflare.com/turnstile-private-captcha-alternative/

    TL:DR cloudflare made a new recaptcha which does some complex math and other stuff on your browser, which done once has no noticable effect but if someone were to scrape websites at an absurd speed it slows everything down significantly.

    this is not only cool because you don’t have to manually solve the captcha, but also because it allows for low-speed scraping to be feasible, with tools like flaresolverr

    • newerAccountWhoDis [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks for being the only person in this thread who doesn’t joke or talk out of their ass order-of-lenin

      Quite interesting really and a genius solution (it they don’t lie about not stealing your data)

      • Treachery4524@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Didn’t the Soviets see geniuses and other intellectuals as a danger to society during the time this award was given out? Or are there incidents where this was given to scientists as well? I know you’re probably joking, but when I suddenly encounter Lenin’s head being used in a positive manner I have to look twice.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s actually kinda cool. Punish the scrapers, but allow regular people to not waste time.

      Meanwhile, Google is having you find the zebra crossing for the 400th time…

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    those will fail anyway on a few sites I’ve gone to. No idea why and sometimes months later it will work for a random interval of time.

  • The_Walkening [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The timing of the click captcha loading is randomized and it probably is looking for human-ish cursor movement? (Like you’re probably moving your hand in imperceptibly small ways that are difficult to replicate). Clicking before it loads and doing it repeatedly probably triggers detection.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I used to think it was timing based, but now leaning on the idea that it just performs more fingerprinting in the background: user agent per ip pool, canvas or puppeteer checks.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is correct. Those captchas are tracking everything they can and comparing it to other results to try and figure this out. Mouse movement, delay before you click, everything.

    • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you don’t know you don’t need to reply.

      What’s the purpose of making fun of someone for asking a question to try to learn?

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ha! They must have missed the billboards, front page newspaper articles, TV reports, and public service annou- oh wait.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I have not been in a coma but…

      I could possibly be the least aware person you’ve ever had a conversation with, digital or otherwise.

      I used to have “weekends” that rotated to different two-day sets every year. One year I got Wednesday and Thursday. I told my wife, “It’s not so bad. At least Thanksgiving falls on a Thursday this year. I checked.” She looked at me and said, “Thanksgiving is on a Thursday every year.” I was over thirty. Had no idea.

      She’s a very patient woman.

  • brianorca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Others mention the mouse motion, and monitoring your other traffic to similar sites. When it shows the checkbox, it has already determined you are probably human. If you had suspicious activity, they will give you more advanced tests instead of just a checkbox.