• bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s a nice idea. But I wonder what the long term ramifications might be. What ripple effects might happen that we can’t see today that end up being problems in the future.

    Human history is littered with such problems.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        While some species may benefit from the absence of mosquitoes, others could face ecological disruptions due to changes in food webs.

        However, eliminating mosquitoes entirely could also have unforeseen consequences, highlighting the importance of careful consideration and scientific research.

        Other people have asked the same question you have, Niko, and scientists think that removing every single mosquito from the world wouldn’t have a bad overall effect on the environment. But none of us are sure what will happen to small ecosystems and whether these would be better off without mosquitoes.

        The science is not really settled yet.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yes I know. And maybe those studies are fully correct. I certainly have no way to cross check them. So you and I must take them at face value.

        But even science will tell you that you should have at least some skepticism of such studies. Because it always seems like we miss some tiny important detail that only reveals it’s self later as we refine our knowledge on a subject.

        • sazey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          I am all for eradicating the mosquito pest but there is no way a study is going to cover all possible impacts of removing them from existence. Anyone claiming to do so is just drunk on hubris.

          • meliaesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            The amount of ecologically horrifying acts that our species has already done, I’d be willing to add “got rid of mosquitos” to the pile.

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    “Sheen, this is the 7th week in a row you’ve shown CRISPR modifications to the mosquito genome to curb malaria in class”

    Comments are all the same as when they made mosquitos infertile, unable to spread malaria or wingless too.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    That seems mild.

    Could we try to convince the males that they are the ugliest things on earth so they find large animals that can step on them?

    Maybe come up with a liquid that you put in standing water that makes the mosquitoes grow very tiny legs and a very large left wing? You know, so they have to fly to move and they can only fly spinning like crazy.

    I got a better one! Make them neon bright and glow in the dark. Make those fuckers be the center of attention. I’m talking kids with nets and old guys with cameras and microscopes with single mosquito flashes (like 1 mosquitoes per photo). And of course sugar sweet flavor? Everything under the sun trying to find them and eat them as snacks. I kinda like this one the best.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      And this is it. This is how we arrive were we are now.

      Nature? KILL IT! EXTERMINATE IT!

      We’ve spend 2000 years slowly being nature to our wims. It has destroyed the planets ecosystem on a scale only seen by planet wide desasters in the past. We have driven countless species into extinction, and still counting. We take without any regard or resecpt for anything then our own needs.

      That is exactly the mindset the comment I am replying to has to me.

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    This is what vegans want. They want to take your virile bloodsucking proboscus and replace it with a limp dick fruit licker.

    BAN ALL VEGANS

    (Small /s)

  • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I am a hippy nature person who tries to be merciful and kind to plants or insects. The sole exception is mosquitoes. Those fuckers want to take my blood and dont settle for one serving if they get the chance. Were in a biological armrace and so far we’ve been loosing. Let’s see how they like being fucked with.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I would take 100 mosquito bites over one tick. One of the only creatures in nature to scare the hell out of me. And I own snakes.

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Ahh, someone else who views the risks correctly. Spent a lot of time in the swamps in Alabama. Wore snake gaiters for the giant cotton mouths. Soaked my clothes in permethrin. Still way more scared of the ticks than the snakes. Especially that Alphagal stuff.

  • P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    I mean, have you ever seen a pug? They’re fighting for air their entire life. Or chihuahua’s? Awful personality and bred out of usefulness.

    • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Chihuahuas can have a not completely closed cranial bone (is this the right word?), which means if you pet them at the wrong place you literally can touch the brain and potentially kill them. My mood would be bad, too, if this was the case for my body.

      Pugs also can have their eyes popping out if you handle them wrong (e.g. gripping them at their neck).

      The head of King Charles Spaniels are to small, meaning their brain does not have enough room. This can lead to brain fluids getting stuck in the head, which increases pressure on the brain, leading to infathomable headaches, hallucinations, motor deficits, etc, pp.

      Breeding some dog breeds should really be prohibited.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        . This can lead to brain fluids getting stuck in the head, which increases pressure on the brain, leading to infathomable headaches, hallucinations, motor deficits, etc, pp.

        Oh man I can never enjoy their derpy look again, knowing it’s because their brain doesn’t have room.

        Breeding some dog breeds should really be prohibited.

        Strong agree. Although there are also breeders doing “healthy” versions of pugs, German sheperds (their hips are awful for them, but the back “sliding down” to low hips was considered an essential characteristic for the race), French bulldogs, etc.

        For pugs they’re calling it “retro pug” and essentially theyre trying to get to what the breeds was before fancy European dog breeders started valuing aesthetics more than say, the dog being able to breathe.

        • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          The AKC and other “dog standards” organizations should be labelled as animal abusers for their rigid requirements in dog breeds. If PETA wants to do good in this world, that’s who they should be targeting.

    • amzd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Or the chickens you eat? They can’t even stand up out of their own feces

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      “You see what we do to the things we love???”

      “What the fuck do you think we’re going to do to you?!”

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    This is a crime against nature and god and decency, and mosquitos are probably the only place I’d be absolutely, completely for it.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    I get the caution about unintended consequences but damnit of all the crazy planetary issues we’re dealing with right now, I’d rank

    “oops, got rid of West Nile and Malaria as well as annoying little red bumps from wandering too far from big cities”

    As a win, the consequences of which we can probably figure out how to deal with when we come to it.

    I know it doesn’t work that way but I’d trade all the world’s mosquitoes to keep the polar bears or pangolins or something any day.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Mosquitoes are the bottom of the food chain. There’s reason to be worried about this getting out of hand

  • bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    We have suffered for millions of years under mosquitos are they are likely the biggest killer of humans in history. Maybe us evolving big brains and developing genetic engineering is an evolutionary necessity?

    Or as Harbinger said: “We impose order on the chaos of organic evolution. You exist because we allow it, and you will end because we demand it.”