• 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Captain America is a weird one to include. Not denying it’s probaganda, everything is, but throwing Cap in with copaganda is such a serface level take. He’s probaganda for American exceptionalism sure, but also embodies it in an old school New Deal way. The character has been consistently anti-facist over the years.

    Imo Iron Man is the much more harmful propaganda. You can pretty much draw a direct line between the characters rise in popularity thanks to the MCU and the rise of Elon Musk.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      People kept calling Musk – Stark because they thought he was a scientist/genius. Like the MCU fake tech was gonna be birthed out of this immature edge lord that steals people’s idea with stolen money.

      Yeah I kinda disagree with Cap as well. He also explicitly refutes the government to stand up what he believes is right in Civil War too.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Any superhero movie is problematic. They all say that only a few special people can save the country and the world. The rest of the population just has to hold tight and let the important people do their thing. It’s just a small step by replacing powers with wealth to give the rich carte blanche to do as they please.

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I wonder if that’s a limit of storytelling. Grand social change is hard to film. Even team effort cohesion requires a lot of actors and writing to pull off.

        No matter how sound the morals and story, if it’s not entertaining, it might fail as mass media.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Thanks for putting this into words. I’ve had a vague discontent and disgruntlement with superhero crap for a long time. While this isn’t the only reason I dislike superhero movies, this is a big part of it.

        I do still like The Punisher movie with Jain, Dredd, The Crow, and a few others. Antiheros in general. They’re also more human and not as one dimensional.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I mean, I’ve definitely seen Cap used to represent the Ugly American in comics, especially during that period post-9/11.

          He’s definitely not fully anti-fascist coded, because he represents the US, and the US while ostensibly being democratic, is in many ways deeply fascist and always has been. Hitler was inspired by our Jim Crow laws.

          There’s some smart people who understand that America never actually stood for any of that stuff and they write Cap to be the same.

          • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Is that Ultimate Cap or 616 Cap? Ultimate Cap was an asshole – even that universe’s Aunt May called him out on his BS after Peter died.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              I’m not a big Marvel fan, I just know I’ve seen lots of examples. Makes sense that they would be alternate universe Caps, tho. That’s a great way to be able to write the character and show the dark side of US politics without necessarily marring the original character himself. However, to outsiders, there’s not really a difference between the two, because they’re not deep in nerd lore.

      • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s deeper than that. It’s about defense of the Status Quo. No superhero looks around at the parts of society that we just accept without thinking about and says this needs to change.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Not those scenes in Spider-Man where New York throws random objects at the villain until they relent. Hell yeah solidarity.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think part of it’s that not all propaganda is bad.

      There’s probably a term for it, but I’d draw a distinction between “opinion” propaganda and “aspirational” propaganda.

      One tries to change your opinion of something, like “cops are good noble and always do the right thing”.
      The other encourages the viewer to live up to some ideal. It’s entirely possible for that ideal to also not be great, but even then “I should be” is better than “they are”.

      A lot of PSAs and things from the ad council fall in the later category. Like the billboards that basically say “real men are present and emotionally available fathers to their children” or "good parents teach their kids healthy diet and exercise by example”.
      They’re openly cases of the government trying to change public opinions or attitudes (which arguably makes them better examples of propaganda than a lot of commercial television), but they don’t feel as objectionable.

      “This honest and kind man who always tries to do good and help those around him to the point that it overshadows him being a physically perfect human is the embodiment of the emblematic American man” is more in that aspirational category.

      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        “Propaganda” comes from “propagate”, so the word inherently isn’t bad. The suffix “anda” basically means “thing of”, so in a literal sense, “propaganda” is any “object of propagation”, although this reading of etymology isn’t widely circulated.

        Propaganda is thus inherently a very all-encompassing term. Any poster, flyer or brochure is propaganda, whether it advertizes a product, service, lost cat, or wants you to join the army. Anything “mass media” is propaganda. Anything spreading “a message” that is meant for wider propagation, regardless of the message content is propaganda.

        At least that’s according to my rudimentary knowledge of high school latin. There’s the more “mainstream”, “official” etymology on Wiktionary: the word was first used in the name of an old Catholic Church department from Latin times for “spreading the faith”, so that’s where the more loaded use and connotation comes from. However, I doubt that this department name is the first ever use of the ablative feminine gerund form of the verb propagate. That’s like saying the first use of the term “World health” is in the name Wirld Health Orgsnization. If anything, someone had to discuss the name beforehand.

        So, there’s this Overton window-esque aspect to the word.

        Wikipedia has a good overview of propaganda, although it is itself loaded onto the “must be loaded (i.e. what you called ‘bad’ propaganda)” definition of propaganda. And they like usibn the word “loaded” a lot.

    • Naia_Elwyn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Kind of what the whole thing in civil war was. Tony was looking to absolve his guilt over the people they failed to save while looking for more and more authoritarian methods of keeping the world “safe”.

      Cap was much more for freedom and while the idea that the avengers should have absolutely no oversight is absurd, the question of who should be the oversight was important and much of what the avengers did could not wait on a committee to decide to act (also, the last time a committee did act they decided to nuke New York)

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      He’s propaganda for American exceptionalism sure, but also embodies it in an old school New Deal way. The character has been consistently anti-facist over the years.

      Pretending that America isn’t only already fascist, but inspired the fascists they are supposedly against is American exceptionalism, and you’re eating it right up.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      He threw a tantrum because he didn’t want public oversight over his and his friend’s superpowers.

      It was basically a “You’re a loose canon, McBain” cop storyline.

      • ninjabard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        You mean the solider who saw what happens when a list of everyone who is considered “other” is ordered and maintained by a government? All because, Tony “I am a gift to God” Stark and Bruce “Couldn’t Say No” Banner created a nigh unstoppable police force with no oversight?

          • brown567@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Captain America was alive for WWII

            Germany created a registry for certain people and it didn’t end well for said people

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Wow… is that your full understanding of Nazi Germany?

              The so-called US also created “a registry” for certain people, which inspired Germany for their Nurenberg race-laws.

              Captain America was fighting for the US while Jim Crow was active. He probably went to school with people who found Hitler’s ideas great.

              • brown567@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                It’s far from my only understanding of it, it’s just the first thing that comes to mind for what might make him averse to a list of “others” being created

                He probably would have also seen what happened with the US’s registry of Japanese people, which didn’t go great for them either

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          IMO, you’re not wrong, but Magneto is the better portrayal.

          Magneto was right all along about the persecution of mutants. Tony Stark and Captain America disagreed on a “who watches the Watchmen” level in the movies.

          Stark thought that heroes had too much power to act without the approval of some higher authority, and the Captain believed that they should be able to act when and where they could without needing permission in order to do the most good. Magneto looked at the number he had tattooed on his wrist as a child in the camps and said, “Never again.”

          • Naia_Elwyn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Tony also had the issue that he felt guilty over his failed plan to protect the world that was pretty authoritarian.

            I don’t think cap would have been against all oversight, but the one presented was very narrow minded and slow to act until more drastic decisions had to be made, like nuking New York.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Magneto looked at the number he had tattooed on his wrist as a child in the camps and said, “Never again.”

            Magneto is one of the posterboys of the swerve.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I tend to lump it in with The West Wing as idealistic wish fulfilment of how we’d like things to be, or a picture of our human potential.

      • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        thats how all these should be seen as, boggles my mind people cant enjoy something fictional because it isnt 100% accurate to real life. like batman, “oh no billionaire would ever be the good guy” yeah okay thats why batman isnt a real guy 😂

        • Soleos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Sometimes the “realism” critique is certainly pedantic and unproductive, but other times what’s really meant is contradiction. Situations should make sense within the fictional world. And in the fictional world of DC, norms around politics and economics are portrayed to be analogous to western neoliberalism with capitalism assumed and unquestioned. So with the Wayne family being a relatively well-regarded billionaire family like the Gates or the Buffets, there is still the issue that it is clear under the current system and that portrayed in DC universe that such wealth cannot be accumulated and sustained without massive exploitation of working class people somewhere along the line. So billionaire + “good guy” starts to become more of a glaring contradiction even in DC. But sure, we can explain it away as fiction with magically ethical capitalists. The interesting thing about the billionaire Wayne discussion though, is when people apply this fictional view of capitalism to how they interpret the real world. And now we’re back to propaganda.

          What I would say that sets West Wing and B99 apart is sometimes there’s a tonal difference or way in which certain themes are handled/portrayed that signals to the viewer that the writers acknowledge this isn’t what real life is like but we hope one day we can get there. And it’s a spectrum right. Some do this to varying degrees, other more propagandistic media do not.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s too much of a generalization. Propaganda is far more specific.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Pretty much spot on, though that is the exact point of these kinds of shows.

      It was part of a wave of shows launched to counter the media perception of incompetence in law enforcement/prosecution. They pushed a bunch of dangerously misleading (or even outright fake) claims such as the reliability and accuracy of forensic evidence which has been later used in actual court cases to imprison innocent people.

      As always, Citations needed has done a brilliant job on this kind of stuff that’s worth a listen.

      https://open.spotify.com/episode/3Gmg1b4MSELodxHnHTQoAC

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yes. That sounds exactly like nazi propaganda.

          Do you even know what that word means?

          So fucking sick of people who do exactly zero reading on a topic spouting off with ‘common sense’ and think their incredulity is the same thing as having a single thought knocking around your head.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Fascism

          Like it’s so fucking hard to imagine that “Super Humans” which exactly translates to German as “Ubermench” could have nazi ideology baked in to the very foundation.

          • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Where exactly does a Captain America comic argue for creating more super soldiers? You think the characters backstory overrules everything he says or does? You said I’ve done “zero reading” but you didn’t even respond to the comic panel I posted, you’re not interested in a conversation, you just want to preach at me

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              Where exactly does a Captain America comic argue for creating more super soldiers?

              What the fuck are you even talking about. Completely incoherent.

              You think the characters backstory overrules everything he says or does?

              You posted a speech and asked if it sounded like nazi propaganda. Now you want me to care about your cartoon lore? Are you here to have an adult conversation or do you want to play with dolls?

              You said I’ve done “zero reading” but you didn’t even respond to the comic panel I posted

              Read the fucking link I gave you and you’ll find the response you asked for. Why do you think I bothered linking it to you? Do you need everything spoonfed? It’s like a page and a half. Fucking Christ.

              • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                Did you even read your own link?

                “Disagreement is treason” – fascism devalues intellectual discourse and critical reasoning as barriers to action, as well as out of fear that such analysis will expose the contradictions embodied in a syncretistic faith

                I posted an exact panel from the source material showing you the character standing against one of the principles of fascism, and you still called it Nazi propaganda? Maybe you should start using your brain instead of calling everything you don’t like Nazi propaganda.

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  If you actually read it instead of just looking for a facile ‘own’ to mine from it, you’d have noticed a lot of the points were contradictory to each other and that there are two or three points that directly apply to super hero comics and that speech in particular.

                  Guy in a thread where the topic is poptarts: “You just say everything you don’t like is poptarts!”

          • Hawanja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            So fucking sick of people who do exactly zero reading on a topic spouting off with ‘common sense’ and think their incredulity is the same thing as having a single thought knocking around your head.

            So fucking sick of people reading a book and suddenly thinking they’re right about everything. Have you considered the book you’re reading may be incorrect, or that there’s more involved with superheros than “Buff white guy = Nazi,” especially with a character that was created specifically to oppose fascism?

            So just the fact that a character is super strong automatically makes him a Nazi?

            Booster Gold is a buff white superhero. Is he a Nazi? Such bullshit.

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              or that there’s more involved with superheros than “Buff white guy = Nazi

              You as a person are exactly as fucking stupid as this strawman

              What a relief to find out the person replying to every comment of mine is a fucking moron that can’t even follow a few simple sentences in a forum comment while shitting on the idea of reading books.

              dot world energy

              • Hawanja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Except in real life you actually said this stupid shit:

                Like it’s so fucking hard to imagine that “Super Humans” which exactly translates to German as “Ubermench” could have nazi ideology baked in to the very foundation.

                This is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve ever read in my entire life and shows you know absolutely nothing about the subject. The concept of a “superhero” predates National Socialism, concept of a Nazi superman, and even the creation of fascism as an ideology itself, and in fact has roots in myths and folklore.

                But you wouldn’t know that because you’re too busy being sniffing your own farts. Here’s some advice, try reading a comic book before you talk about them, maybe then you won’t look so stupid.

    • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Propaganda does not inherently mean something is wrong. Capitan America was created as propaganda to encourage the US to join WWII.

      Captain America’s creation as an explicitly anti-Nazi figure was a deliberately political undertaking: Simon and Kirby were stridently opposed to the actions of Nazi Germany and supporters of U.S. intervention in World War II, with Simon conceiving of the character specifically in response to the American non-interventionism movement. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_America

      More recently, the character has certainly been used as propaganda for American nationalism in meme culture

  • Hyacin (He/Him)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I have a Flag Smashers shirt… go figure, they speak to me.

    I was putting it on a couple days ago and I paused and thought about it, and suddenly realized the immensity of the propaganda - the great Captain America destroying the evil socialists who think resources should be shared by everyone, and that nationalism is a barrier to truly having ‘one human family’.

    Blew my mind it took me this long. Also made me wonder if they were dug up from long ago comics when America was openly and blatantly monitoring and persecuting socialists and communists (specifically picturing the scenarios and time illustrated in Oppenheimer). Haven’t had a chance to dig in to that part yet, but I will right now!

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I like the myth of the police, not actual cops, I like Simon Pegg in Hot Fuzz, actual cops can suck a nard

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Crazy how much of this stuff is subsidized by or directly financed by the national security state. The most infamous, in my memory anyway, was the Transformers Franchise which got enormous access to US military staff and equipment during the shooting. The end result was a movie that felt more like one of those hookey 80s “Join the Marines” ads than a piece of action cinema.

      • beesthetrees@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        At least the newer Transformers films are better in that regard, with the latest film not having anything to do with it. Then again I heard they are doing a Transformers x GI Joe film.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Double Woof.

          But yes, a lot of this just comes down to who will pay to finance the film. If Raytheon or the US Marines is willing to pick up a big chunk of the production costs, you’re going to keep seeing them in the producer credits and “Special Thanks To” sections.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I kinda get it though…it’s not like these armed forces are producing the movie themselves.

        The studio wants to make a movie about/involving these entities. They want it to be as realistic as possible and the entity itself has the authority to give them access that it could also deny.

        If you’re in charge of, say, the Marines PR department, you’re constantly trying to make the Corps look good and boost recruitment. If you can do this for next to nothing against your budget by granting access to a studio making a film that will give you essentially free PR, that’s a great move. The bigger the movies potential, the more the entity in question is motivated to support it.

        On the other hand, if the film is going to make your organization look bad, no PR person with a functioning brain is going to help that project in any way.

        Idunno, I feel like these organizations do enough actually bad things, that I don’t feel the urge to crucify them for cultivating image and working to generate positive PR.

          • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Legally it’s totally okay, actually.

            I know this is all very unpopular opinion here on Lemmy, but it’s fact.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          The studio wants to make a movie about/involving these entities.

          Studios want cheap special effects budgets and the MIC wants cheap labor. So you get what amounts to a promotional video for branches of the service, paid for out of the operating budgets of these agencies.

          Idunno, I feel like these organizations do enough actually bad things, that I don’t feel the urge to crucify them for cultivating image and working to generate positive PR.

          I think a big part of the “doing bad things” process is facilitated by whitewashing our activities in Kandahar or Fallujah with “We’re just cool dudes fighting big monsters” action movie propaganda. Is Transformers as egregious as Rambo II or American Sniper? Not strictly. But its geared towards a younger audience, so it can’t do the same kind of blood-drenched jingoism in that way.

          I would consider gulling 12-year-olds into aspiring to become conscript killers for the oil & gas industry overseas pretty fucking bad, though.

  • Sol 6 VI StatCmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    The cop dramas are often like modern fantasy to me. There’s different classes and quests. It doesn’t reflect real life.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      We’re more aware of it now. Cop shows have always been about cops willing to break the rules, and they are made the heroes. This gave a whole generation an excuse to look at dirty cops as heroes doing what they needed to do