U.S. President Joe Biden plans to announce on Wednesday that his administration has approved an additional $9 billion in student debt relief for 125,000 borrowers, the White House said.

Biden has said he will pursue new measures to provide student loan relief to Americans after the Supreme Court blocked his plan to cancel hundreds of billions of dollars in debt.

The president’s announcement, planned for 1 p.m. EDT at the White House, will bring the total approved debt cancellation by the Biden administration to $127 billion for nearly 3.6 million Americans, the White House said.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      How about just anyone under the age of 60

      Between 40 and 50 would be ideal.

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I actually think 50-60 would be ideal. Obama, in his mid-40s, was a relative political newcomer in 2008 (compared to other candidates, at least, not like Trump-style) and he made many missteps as a result. The ACA, for example, could have been far more broad. They didn’t need massive moderate support.

        Of course, some people enter politics pretty young. By the time Maxwell Frost hits 45, for example, he might have 20 years in federal politics. It’s rare that we find people with so much experience at that age though.

        • thallamabond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The aca was much more broad, it initially included a single player option, but that was excluded by Joe Lieberman.

          He threatened to kill the whole thing if single payer was included.

          Lieberman then quit the Democratic party and now he’s founding chairman of No Labels

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        In 2000 Putin was between 40 and 50. Depends on what is ideal for you. Between 18 and 30 would be ideal.

        • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think an 18 year old president is a good idea. Bold of me to say, I know.

          Also, I don’t think Putin’s age was the problem when he took office the first time… it was that he is Putin.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      54
      ·
      9 months ago

      There always has been but people are afraid to vote 3rd party because of the oligarchy’s brainwashing

      • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not brainwashing when the voting system is specifically set up to give an advantage to the dominant parties and to suppress every minority party. There are valid reasons to be skeptical that a 3rd party could ever win without a reformed voting system.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          9 months ago

          They also can’t win if everybody says “don’t vote for them because they can’t win” so I will carry on voting for them and spreading the word that we all should.

          • plutus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’d be a lot better off voting for majority party candidates that want to enact ranked-choice voting.

            Until that happens, unfortunately the reality is that third parties are going to remain on the margins in the US.

            • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Political parties never change in the US. That’s why I’m still voting for the Whig party.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                And it’s always settled to two major parties, in spite of that. The fact that we’ve had several parties over the country’s history but it almost always comes down to two major parties should tell you something.

                Fortunately, there may be an opening soon, with Republicans in disarray.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            They can’t win because they don’t even play the game correctly. You can’t just get up and give grand speeches about radically different ideas, with little to no strategy or evidence to back it up and expect to jump into literally the most powerful job in the world. It’s utter nonsense. Unless you’re a Billionaire that wants to buy your way in.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              You can tell none of the third parties are serious because all their attention goes to the presidency.

              They have no consideration for what would happen if they actually won. No representatives in the House, no senators, no state governors even. They’d be lame ducks the instant they were sworn in.

              They should be targeting Congressional seats and state governorships. Instead, they’re just grifting money.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                They’d be lame ducks the instant they were sworn in.

                Congress spent the last century concentrating power in the executive. I think you’d be surprised what a motivated individual could accomplish.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You’re underestimating Congress. It still plays a lot of roles, especially the Senate. It just isn’t obvious because the president’s party typically has control at the beginning of their terms.

                  This would probably work for Greens except that they don’t have people running for those positions.

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    what’s the senate going to do? remove them? not if the senators are jailed on corruption and war crime charges.

      • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not fear. Third parties simply do not work with our system. If you want third parties to succeed, then we need to

        • Get rid of the electoral college
        • Ranked Choice Voting everywhere
      • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not that simple. Several factors come into play.

        The biggest systemic issues are the first past the post voting system and the electoral college (for president).

        People who have even a simplistic understanding of how the system works and the track record for third parties know the odds are low. Those who are pragmatic will vote for Dem or Rep. In the current polarized political climate people are less likely to take a chance with a third party vote.

        Also, the press mostly ignores candidates of other parties. So they aren’t as well known and thus can’t get popular enough to get traction.

        If you really want more parties to have a chance, push for alternate voting systems like ranked choice, cumulative, etc.

        This chart from fairvote.org compares a number of different systems based on their research.

      • nocturne213@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        In 2016 I voted for Gary Johnson because I thought there was really no way anyone would vote for the other two.

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Gary Johnson is a fool who didn’t even act like he was seriously running for President. It looked like he drew the short straw.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I have no idea what elements of libertarianism you like, nor why a ex-Republican for that roll in your mind, but he would have been a bad Republican, but not Trump. He had no chance so it really didn’t matter