Sarah Huckabee Sanders rose to national prominence in part during her time at the lectern as White House press secretary, but the purchase of a $19,000 lectern for the Arkansas governor is undergoing scrutiny and prompting claims that records about it have been altered.

A legislative panel next week will take up a lawmaker’s request for an audit to review the purchase of the lectern, which was bought in June for $19,029.25 with a state credit card. The Arkansas Republican Party reimbursed the state last month for the wood-paneled and blue lectern, which the state received in August.

“From my experience, where we’re at with this particular thing is we need to allow legislative audit go in,” Republican Sen. Jimmy Hickey, who requested the audit, said. “Everyone knows them, they do their work, they’re very thorough and then they produce a detailed report that comes to the Legislature through an open committee.”

    • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      IMO, this quote from a fellow r, is telling everyone around him to not worry about it. Everyone knows the guy and the detailed report will cover it up.

      “From my experience, where we’re at with this particular thing is we need to allow legislative audit go in,” Republican Sen. Jimmy Hickey, who requested the audit, said. “Everyone knows them, they do their work, they’re very thorough and then they produce a detailed report that comes to the Legislature through an open committee.”

      • Turducken@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Hickey was pushed out as state Senate leader, he has an axe to grind and isn’t afraid of a primary.

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been slacking… I should’ve posted this over in /c/arkansas long ago.

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Man they got fucking robbed. Amazon has it for only $944 The Amazon review though…

    If you are concerned about wasteful spending I highly recommend going with this price from Amazon

    EDIT: Yes, I’m pretty sure they paid $1,000 for it and then reported $19,000 pocketing the difference. As someone who has lived their whole life in Tennessee (and has worked for a period of time in State Government), that’s Southern politics 101. Days where they aren’t fleecing the taxpayer are few and far between here in the Southeastern US.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      10 months ago

      Brent ☆☆☆☆☆

      Perfect at home in Arkansas or with my friends in Paris

      Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2023

      Don’t let your husband or state know that this thing is under $1,000 because it could go for $19,000-$20,000 EASILY! It’s the perfect accessory for “governing”, photoshopping, and fraud. Me and the gal pals really enjoyed this from afar while we were in Paris, France. 10/10

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      10 months ago

      The fact that this is on Amazon for under a grand is hilarious. These people are absolute morons. I hope they get nailed and the truth comes out.

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah straight up corruption, lying and stealing. And will she ever be punished for her blatant abuse of power? Nope. Obviously this should ban her from ever being anywhere near public office but that won’t ever happen and they’ll continue to do it until there are consequences. I feel like I repeat that a lot nowadays but people get away with too much ridiculous shit these days and are never punished for it. George Santos anybody? How the fuck is he still in office? We need some fucking standards otherwise the country will continue to go to shit.

    • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      They didn’t pocket the difference. Gov Sanders used state money to go on vacation and this is the cover.

      • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s what “pocketing the difference” is. She took the state money she said was used for the lectern and used it for personal purposes.

        • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          She went on the trip first and then bought the lectern when people started asking questions. Pocketing the difference doesn’t apply because the theft happened first.

          • enki@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re being very pedantic about something very unimportant. Sometimes it’s best to just let it go.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The timing is not as relevant as you think it is here. Just because you arrange for restitution to be made by a third party before or around the time your theft is discovered does not automatically mean a crime has not been committed.

            • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Im not saying a crime never happened. Im saying the crime preceded the purchase so they aren’t pocketing the difference. The expense is being justified by the purchase to cover for the crime

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      lol, yhgtbsm. Unbelievable.

      A ~$900 lectern for $19k. Fraud in broad daylight. I can’t call it “skimming off the top” because it’s so upside down.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Arkansas Republican Party reimbursed the state last month for the wood-paneled and blue lectern, which the state received in August.

    Is this typical for the party to reimburse the state for an elected official? If it was reimbursed from campaign funds, wouldn’t that be covered by campaign finance laws? Sounds like either the Republican Party is trying to cover it up by reimbursing for it, or they’re doing weird accounting to get through a loophole of campaign finance laws.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a coverup. There only defense is “we made an oopsy. This was supposed to be bought with private funds and now it is after it became a clear case of grift. Nothing to see here, tee hee.”

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is there ever a time where it is above board for these types of reimbursements to happen? Seems like it should be something illegal already, but maybe there’s something I’m missing?

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’ll be honest… I only clicked on this article because I was curious as to what a $19,000 lectern looks like. 🤷

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sanders’ entire job at the White House involved lying to the public on a regular basis. Is it any wonder she leveraged the same skill set at her next job?

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Working as intended. Having the government overpay tenfold for goods and services is neoliberals favourite method of converting public funds into private profit.

      • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I used to work in aerospace and we had a few government customers. Every single government part was sold to a contractor who then flipped it to the government for like 10x what they paid for it.

        It was real annoying when they needed parts for old aircraft with deprecated specifications/components that were no longer available because the contractors had no engineering staff so we couldn’t ask them for clarification on which parts/specs to use beyond standard military supercessions which sometimes had no suitable replacements.

      • downpunxx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know a thing or two about fancy lecterns and that one couldn’t cost more than 2 grand on a good day except if it was being used to cover up corruption and graft in the Humunculoid Huckabee Arkansas state government

        • MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t know anything about fancy lecterns, but looking at the Amazon link someone posted, I can certainly recognize particleboard with a wood-grain veneer on it… Honestly, $2k feels expensive for that, I’d say it should be about $500 at Ikea.

          • bluGill@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            If Ikea made this it would be a lot less than $500. However there isn’t enough demand for Ikea to make one. With both this and Ikea you are paying for both materials and all the jigs needed to get the particle board cut to the correct size - there is a lot of engineering costs in that, and they have much less sales to spread those costs over.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        This one isn’t that fancy though. I’ve seen some hand carved that are clearly more than that, but this doesn’t those expensive features.

    • Holomew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Of course it costs 20 grand, look at all that embellishment!

      Sorry, I meant embezzlement.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      The made in china version is $1000. Make it custom in the US with real hardwood and we are more like $5000. We can see that has a mic installed, which is $500 for a good mic (A $10 mic would work okay, but the $500 does sound better and isn’t unreasonable), which we will pair with electronics to turn the audio into digital for another $500. While we are at it we will build in a computer with a presenters display all connected to the building video system - another $5000.

      I’m trying to be generous by using the highest reasonable costs and the most complex feature set. I still can only come up with $11k.

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oddly enough, the ‘official’ presidential mic is a pair of Shure SM57s which cost $100 brand new.

        • bluGill@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          There is nothing wrong with a SM57 in this application, but you can get a better mic for more $$$. Generally people going for a better mic first head to a studio and have an engineer try them on each one until they find one that sounds good with their voice. But in the end the difference from the sound of a SM57 is tiny so few bother, even the best professionals often choose a SM57 for their best recordings after comparing to more expensive microphones.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        $10 would work ok but $500 not unreasonable

        It’s just 50x the price to go from ‘okay’ to ‘good’, fuck it why not 200x to get the ‘great’ model? It’s only taxpayers money!

        Shit, if I ran this country, everyone would be using $10 ikea end tables stacked 2x tall for their ‘I’m important and need a fancy stand’. The microphone is your voice being louder. Want a chair, that’s not in the budget sorry. You so much as take an Uber to a press conference and that’s also coming out of your own pocketbook. Ain’t showed up on Thursday? You ain’t getting paid for Thursday. Govt shutdown? Oh I’m sorry, you thought you were getting paid for not doing your job?

        But no, no, gotta pamper the idiots who think they matter. Damn country is fucked 8 ways from Sunday.

        • bluGill@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          A $100 mic (the SM57 the president uses) is enough better than a $10 mic that speakers and audiences should care. The $500 mic is slightly better but most people can’t tell outside of AB tests in a controlled environment. As you go over $100 in price microphones get more special purpose and often are worse than cheaper ones outside of their special purpose - each human voice is different, so $500 is about the most you can spend on a general purpose microphone and be objectively better than something cheaper. While you can spend $2000 or even $4000 on a microphone, they tend to be very fragile - as in breath on them wrong and you break them - so they are only used in studios where you can ensure nobody breaths wrong around them.

      • enki@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I could see a handmade, hardwood lectern by a local artisan reaching that price point, and I think that’s totally reasonable for something that could be used for more than a century. Bonus, you’re giving back to the residents of your state by buying local.

        But nah, this thing looks like cheaper garbage than some of the furniture I owned in college. $900 is a stretch.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      As a amateur furniture maker, I could totally figure out how to make this thing cost $20k. It’d look so much cooler than this shit though…

    • ConstableJelly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not a lectern aficionado, but I feel very confident agreeing with you that this particular lectern is offensively ugly.

  • argo_yamato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    “This is nothing more than a manufactured controversy by left-wing activists to distract from the bold conservative reforms the governor has signed into law and is effectively implementing in Arkansas,” Henning said in a statement.

    Haha so I guess “bold conservative reforms” is their new code phrase for hatred and intolerance.

      • SARGEx117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Someone paid $20.28 for that and $6.99 for a rattlecan of metallic blue, and then charged the other $19,000.00 for “labor”. (I’m optimistically assuming they paid tax on the store bought items)

  • BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    It should be removed one day and replaced with four empty boxes and a big lots desktop microphone.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      4 boxes yes. However instead of microphone jut buy/rent a good wireless lapel mic system. It is what nearly every presenter wants anyway.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The lectern’s purchase was first uncovered by Matthew Campbell, an attorney and blogger who has sued State Police for withholding records he had requested about Sanders’ travel and security.

    Days after Campbell filed his initial suit, Sanders called a special legislative session and proposed broad exemptions to the state’s open records law.

    Sanders signed into law a measure restricting the public’s access to her travel and security records after she and lawmakers backed off more widespread exemptions that faced backlash from media groups, transparency advocates and some conservatives.

    According to Mars’ letter, the interference includes the governor’s office altering an invoice from Beckett Events LLC, the Virginia firm listed as the seller of the lectern.

    “This is nothing more than a manufactured controversy by left-wing activists to distract from the bold conservative reforms the governor has signed into law and is effectively implementing in Arkansas,” Henning said in a statement.

    Hickey’s request also asks for an audit of all matters regarding security and travel records for the governor or her office that were retroactively made confidential by the law she signed last month.


    The original article contains 745 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!