The Coast Guard has recovered remaining debris, including presumed human remains, from a submersible that imploded on its way to explore the wreck of the Titanic, killing all five onboard, deep beneath the Atlantic Ocean’s surface, officials said Tuesday.

The Coast Guard said that the recovery and transfer of remaining parts was completed last Wednesday, and a photo showed the intact aft titanium endcap of the 22-foot (6.7-meter) vessel. Additional presumed human remains were carefully recovered from within Titan’s debris and transported for analysis by U.S. medical professionals, the Coast Guard said.

The salvage mission conducted under an agreement with the U.S. Navy was a follow-up to initial recovery operations on the ocean floor roughly 1,600 feet (488 meters) away from the Titanic, the Coast Guard said.

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I had no idea they are still pulling up remains.

    The US has already spent millions on search and rescue (it surpassed 1.2 million even before the wreckage was found).

    Anyone else love that the ultra rich can book quarter million dollar trips on ridiculous vehicles and then still cost the taxpayers millions.

    If you are wealthy enough to book a trip into space or to the bottom of the ocean, then you need to be paying (in advance) for whatever resulting expenses might come out of that…or be required to carry the insurance that will cover it. It’s stupid that taxpayers have to pay for this and that the Coast Guard is STILL AT IT…racking up more costs.

    • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be a little more clear about the cost:

      Pilots must fly a minimum number of hours, regardless of what is going on in the world. Adding a mission (such as search and rescue) to those flights is trivial because the man hours, fuel, and maintenance are already allocated.

      They may have added to the plans but a lot of the cost is already paid when these things start.

      • krayj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s a single narrow example and does not accurately account for the taxpayer cost of doing this.

        When it’s reported that the government estimates the cost to be 1.2 million (and that estimate was as of some date back in June - source: https://en.as.com/latest_news/missing-titan-submarine-how-much-does-the-search-and-rescue-mission-cost-and-whos-paying-for-it-n-2/ ) I understand that to mean over and above what their daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly predictable/normal expenses are.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s part of their mission.

          Nothing in that article implies it’s over and above their normal budget. It doesn’t say either way and the Washington Post article it referenced is paywalled.

          Besides this being a large part of why we have the coast guard in the first place, this is a way for them to test their training in a real world mission and see how it works and how it doesn’t.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            People don’t get this about military exercises and spending. They would already be doing those things and spending that money. Might as well use it when the opportunity arises.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also, there’s a pretty good chance that data from the imploded submarine can go towards making future submarines safer. But it’s harder to get that data without recovery

        • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not a new unproven technology, there’s no “data to help future submersible”. They CAN make it safe, they’re ADVISED to make it safe, they’re PROTESTED to make it safe.

          But they CHOOSE not to because it’s cheaper.

          Everyone in-the-know knew it was bad and unsafe and will probably ended in tragedy. They speak up, they protest, and they got punished by the one in charge.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            It sounded to me like it was more of arrogance (‘I know better than everybody else’) than cost cutting. Although the part about not getting the design certified was probably for cost cutting and time saving reasons.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Really

            You really want me to think that engineers won’t find it useful at all

            • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I mean kind of… it’s like trying to make a kamikazi plane safer. Literally everyone with a shred of knowlege knew it was going to fail and told him, he just did’t listen.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You mean that otherwise just fly around in circles despite a supposed pilot shortage? I’m surprised.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why are they spending more money on this? The remains are just as hard to reach as the bodies on a mountain, and we know what happened.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Training. Putting their training against a real world experience and seeing where it holds up and where it doesn’t.

        Because they have to do something. It’s not like they just sit there with their dicks in their hands all day.

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not like they just sit there with their dicks in their hands all day.

          The U.S. Navy?? You didn’t think we call them seamen cuz of the water, did you?

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I would rather we pay them to sit around with their dicks in their hands than to look for thos stupid submarine.

        • atetulo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not like they just sit there with their dicks in their hands all day.

          I mean, if there’s not a job to be done then what are we paying them for? They can find some other way to be useful to society in the interim.

          Why are we giving them bullshit tasks just so they can be occupied and take up resources?

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        We have enough wealth in America to afford both, just need the voters to make it happen.