• David Gerard@awful.systems
    shield
    OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    note: tech sociopath apologists in this thread will be removed and banned for everyone’s best interests

  • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I read the whole transcript and I came to conclusion that the author is , to put it gently, bad faith.

    Of course if you’re going to give negative opinion on the product made by a single man he is going to want to talk with you. The opposite would be strange, and denying its right to answer is disrespectful and childish.

    Doesn’t mean you have to apologize or concede anything, but giving the man a quick and sincere talk about it is just basic level of dignity.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, I think the harassment is unwarranted and clearly the CEO thinks he’s too important to be ignored. But the content of the email itself seems to make sense to me. Am I missing something?

    • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m with you on this, it seems he reached out, then just addressed the points raised in the blog? It feels like doing it this way is better than writing a shit-post blog rebuttal? The blogger then reposted their emails as well without asking permission, which, depending on jurisdiction might be questionable.

      I feel this whole post/scenario has been elevated to nothing from nothing.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Refusing to discuss in fear of being cornered sounds childish to me, especially as a reply to a first message! If your arguments are strong and reasonable, there is absolutely nothing wrong in discussing a subject.

    Looking at this, it even sounds great that he would be willing to discuss with users.

    I dont understand the hostility really What do you want them to do instead? Just cave in to every request anyone may have?

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So in reading the comments from Lori there is a pretty good reason why the initial offer for a call was rejected, this was left out in the main body of the post. Their point was if a private conversation takes place, especially over a call where information isn’t recorded, then the CEO could claim whatever they want took place during that conversation.

      Here is the quote, you can find it in the third comment from the top:

      “1) If there’s one thing I know about online interactions, it’s not to let someone take you to Crime Scene Number Two. Having a private debate with Vlad about this would mean no witnesses and no accountability, meaning he could claim anything about the discussion. Even moreso when done through a call instead of text.”

      So I do agree that it seems a bit hostile for a first response but it does seem to come from experience with these situations. You could give the CEO the benefit of the doubt and say that wasn’t his intentions, but if I was in Lori’s shoes I would have reacted the same way and not given the benefit of the doubt.

  • Mii@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was delighted to find a sci-fi story hidden between pages full of AI shilling on the website, and then disappointed because it’s not even funny-bad.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m just trying to use independent search engines with their own index/crawler. I used DDG for many years but the fact that it’s basically a front end for Bing and Microsoft started to bother me, particularly since they put ChatGPT into Bing.

    I only know of Brave Search, Mojeek, and Kagi to be independent and private at this point. I don’t want to pay for Kagi, Mojeek has its uses but I wouldn’t use it as my main engine, so that left Brave Search. The company and CEO is sus, I don’t use their chromium browser, and their search results seem to emulate and optimize ranking based on the big guys (Google and Bing) but in 2024 search is hard to come by and it’s more important to me to be fully independent of big tech.

    • Zoop@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I saw this post earlier that mentions some other search options, along with plenty of other suggestions in the comments. Hopefully you can find something you like in there! I haven’t checked them all out myself yet.

    • Mojeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      are you able to let us know what you use Mojeek for? Just interested in where we slot in

      • archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Tldr: I like your ranking algo. Feels like a breath of fresh air reminiscent of the old days of search and internet

        Long version: When I want to get results for a query, not for an intent per se, I use Mojeek.

        It works best for certain types of queries. When I want to get out of the commercialized, centralized, sanitized, SEO-ridden bubble that is every other search engine, Mojeek let’s me find way more potentially obscure, unique, and satisfying results per query that likely wouldn’t rank favorably with the modern page quality criteria used by Google. Plus, compared to the same 5 websites you’ll see for every query on other engines because of that very criteria, Mojeek has way more diversity in sources.

        With all these corporations incentivized to further commercialize and consolidate the internet and with the rise of AI as a source of knowledge, Mojeek is one of the places I hang onto to explore a web of humans instead of a web of reputation and money.

        • Mojeek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thanks a lot for sharing such a detailed rundown of what you find Mojeek to be useful for. I’ve shared this with the wider team.

          This being said, if you have things that you’d like to wing our way in terms of improvements, or feedback on individual results, our inbox is always open (aloe at mojeek dot com) and there’s a submit feedback button on results pages. Mojeek thrives and grows off of feedback, the good and the bad 🙏

      • cashew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’ve proven to be extremely hostile in this thread. I don’t know which account here is the author but it seems someone here has the power to ban dissidents. Please ban me so I don’t have to see this shit anymore.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            RISE, COMRADES, AGAINST THE TYRANNY OF…checks notes…ANY MODERATION WHATSOEVER

            (e: adding /s, because otherwise this is going to become a fucking magnet for more dipshits)

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            we sure will miss out on all 6 of their posts. and of course one of them’s a bad take on AI, in case there was any doubt

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah I had a weirdass email exchange with that same guy that pushed me away from Kagi forever. It was one of those “borderline technically honest but still blatantly dodging and obfuscating” type situations.

      I shared a screenshot once, but got nothing but defense for the guys dodgy behavior, so I’ve been quiet about it, so this feels pretty validating that my gut feelings were right.

      I think a lot of people get cultish about it because they’re paying a subscription for it, so they have to believe it’s good.

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            this thread has been an excellent honeypot for some of the worst people on Lemmy, and TechTakes definitely needed some cleaning up now that our threads keep hitting all

            it’s very funny to see how those posters react to the idea that their fucking garbage takes in defense of an asshole CEO aren’t welcome here, and that we have a minimum standard they just aren’t meeting. there’s this weird concept in a lot of folks’ heads from shareholder-oriented social media like Reddit that every community is for them and has to suffer their garbage, but that thankfully isn’t the case here.

            • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              it’s also hugely amusing that the default Lemmy behaviour is mod-removed comments get removed from their home instance too

              • froztbyte@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                proposal to change the mod button to be a mini icon of a nuke

                for maximum points, a small animation of a nuke from orbit

  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ll be honest, I wanted to like Kagi because Google has become so useless. But I’ve not had any better success finding things on it than Google.

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That he called the blog post ‘an incredible amount of research’ is quite odd. Either it is a failed attempt at sucking up, or a sign Vlad has a very bad idea of what research is.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Eh, nothing wrong with accepting payments in crypto. Sometimes the gas fees are a lot less than what a payment provider / credit card provider would charge.

        • Deborah@hachyderm.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          This post has been a real honeypot, hasn’t it?

          (Can we try mixing the honey with a little borax so they bring it back to the nest, like you can do for ants?)

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        2018 called, it wants its shitty coiner propaganda talking points back

        (actually not sure if by 2018 coiners had moved on from dunking on credit card fees)

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No clue why they’d willingly accept crypto - they aren’t doing anything that’d have credit card companies running for the hills.

  • slopjockey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    they did in fact reach at least 20,000 users, and to celebrate they set up a business entity in Germany (they are currently US based), in order to start a tiny little t-shirt printing company. And their goal was to print 20,000 t-shirts to give out, FOR FREE, to their first 20,000 users (with users paying only shipping costs). But I cannot stress enough, they did not just spend money on 20,000 tshirts to give out, they set up a whole new business entity in Germany to run their own t-shirt printing operation, with its own building and warehouse and employee(s? I get the sense it’s one guy but I don’t know). And this cost them 1/3 of their $670k funding round. One, fucking, third. For t-shirts. Did I mention that the t-shirts don’t even have the Kagi name on them? Just the Kagi dog mascot

    0% interest rate behavior

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also Kagi is a glorified Google front end.

      The fact a glorified Google front end manages to be less shit than Google is a pretty damning indictment of Google, I’ll give Kagi that. Quoting Cory Doctorow, gratuitous italics and all:

      The implications of this are stunning. It means that Google’s enshittified search-results are a choice. Those ad-strewn, sub-Altavista, spam-drowned search pages are a feature, not a bug. Google prefers those results to Kagi, because Google makes more money out of shit than they would out of delivering a good product: https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/2/24117976/best-printer-2024-home-use-office-use-labels-school-homework

      • mountainriver@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        A Danish ad company made a Google interface that they called “impersonal me” which searched Google with no personalisation. And not only was it better than Google search, it found things that normal Google just didn’t show. In particular old comments I had written and lost track of. In the impersonal search they were easily found, in the normal search they weren’t way down on the list, they weren’t in the list at all.

        Fascinatingly bad.

  • V0ldek@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    There seems to be an incredibly large intersection between sociopathic dipshits and failure to understand the basics of GDPR.

    “Email address is not PII” is such a deep level of not getting it it’s indistinguishable from satire.

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      i absolutely love the “clarification” that an email address is PII only if it’s your real, primary, personal email address, and any other email address (that just so happens to be operated and used exclusively by a single person, even to the point of uniquely identifying that person by that address) is not PII

  • V0ldek@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I literally learnt about Kagi like a week ago from a Cory Doctorow’s post. I was like oh, cool, someone there to fight google.

      • No1@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So close!

        We were right there!

        And then Vlad had to do his impaling thing…

    • shadow@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ah man, same. Thought I’d give it a go after reading about if from Cory…

      Honestly, for what I search for, DDG is sufficient, and it’s not gonna hassle me about subscriptions.

      What I’d really like to find is something like a pihole for search, where you have your blocklist, cache of things you’ve searched already (your own mini search engine?), and then a fallback engine (DDG, bing, Google, whatever) for things it doesn’t already know.

      I dunno. Search and AI botshit is everywhere, and it’s gonna keep getting worse. Self-hosting tools seems to be the only way to take control back.

      • Chamomile 🐑@furry.engineer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        @shadow @V0ldek > What I’d really like to find is something like a pihole for search, where you have your blocklist, cache of things you’ve searched already (your own mini search engine?), and then a fallback engine (DDG, bing, Google, whatever) for things it doesn’t already know.

        I think SearXNG sort of fulfills this, from what I’ve heard? It’s more or less a self-hosted search engine that can combine indexes from various other engines, and I presume that means you can set your own rules and filters and such. There are public instances as well.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The searxng public instances tend to be a bit shit.

          They’re slow. Maybe only several seconds but that feels like an eternity in 2024.

          They also frequently seem to be blocked by the services they’re scraping.

      • ahopefullycuterrobot@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was trying and failing to do something like that. Basically, using ArchiveBox to download bookmarks, and then use recoll to index the webpages + PDFs + my own writing. Assumption was that I probably already bookmarked or had copies of what I wanted and just needed a quite way to find them. Was eventually going to import my browsing history as well. It ended up being more trouble than it was worth. (Too many bookmarks, not enough disk space, didn’t know what the best setting for ArchiveBox were, Archivebox has its own search and I wasn’t sure how that compared to recoll, unsure most efficient way to delete useless downloaded pages or curate them, etc.)

        I do use uBlacklist and the Huge AI Blocklist subscription to try to clean up my search results. Not sure how effective they are over all though.