• Jeom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    not a big gamer but saw the civ 6 was discounted to 2 usd had to get it ofc and enjoying the single player life

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I fucking love civ 6 and I’ll fight anyone who tries to tell me it’s bad. I tried playing 5 as my first civ game around the time it came out but I don’t think I had the attention span for it and I never got into it. Got 6 as part of a humble bundle thing and didn’t touch it for years, randomly decided to give it a go and gyatdamn.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Civ 5 sunk it’s teeth into me deep. I could never stand 6. I only managed about 41 hours into 6, but 5 I have well over a thousand in (even if steam only reports 600 of it)

      • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I just hate the pathetic effort they put into the quotes. Sean Bean was a weird choice anyway (“what do people universally and forever like? Game Of Thrones I suppose!”) but then they had him read quotes from literal blogs and often quotes that shat all over the technology you’d just researched. Oh! I completed a wonder! I definitely want to hear a quote about how it’s obsolete now and its abandonment caused immense poverty in the Ruhr valley.

        That and the movement towards nations instead of, yknow, Civilizations. Sorry Australia, you are not a Civilisation. Nor is Canada. Nor Scotland. How do we have Scotland - an independent country for less than 300 years - and not the fucking Celts.

    • OttoVonNoob@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve been hmming and hawing in answering this. But I’m out for dinner and bored. So alot games original vision is to be a single player experience but then online features or an online overhaul is shoved by the aboves. IE SimCity was considered unplayable by thr online features, anthem was originally designed to be single player but was completely redone, etc etc.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I see that. I remember the disappointment of sim city.

        It could be I don’t follow games close enough to see what I’m missing. I find more SP games popping up in my feeds / friend recommendations than I could ever hope to play.

        I definitely feel like mainstream AAA/AAAA and even iii to a certain extent have been progressively enshittified. But I’ve been at this a while, so I’ve seen how it’s gone this way as more and more money got brought to bare on games.

        The moment someone who wasn’t involved in actually making some part of the game was expecting a fat return on investment was the moment the wheel of shit started to turn.

      • ArrogantAnalyst@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If he never played the original I think it’s good he starts with it. Black Mess is great, but the original Half Life has a certain historical value (and is still a great game).

              • ArrogantAnalyst@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                And you’re saying there’s no difference between playing Black Mesa today vs playing Half life today, and therefore he might as well start out with Black Mesa? Or what is the meaning of your reply?

                Hard disagree. Games like Half life have a huge historical value for their impact. Playing the original is worth it. Especially if one takes the medium itself seriously. You wouldn’t say an original movie and a 22 years younger remake are “the same”, right? I think you’re playing dumb with me.

                Love the Wikipedia link btw. I’ve played Black Mesa in its early access phase already and then later on again when they released Xen.

                • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  No, I just think you’re kinda dumb now looking for a pedantic fight on Lemmy of all places trying to argue that Half-Life and Black Mesa aren’t the same story and essential game lol.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I know that Nvidia released a Portal mod, so the Source Engine is already done. No idea how much effort is needed between games.

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Couch co-op, split-screen, hotseat; Kingdom Two Crowns is nice. So is Darksiders Genesis, For The King, Moon Hunters, Trine, etc.

        Always on the lookout for other good co-op couch games, especially with a good story, but I feel that they are few and far between. :(

      • idunnololz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        A few games that are great single player can also be played with friends such as Terraria, Stardew Valley, Factorio and Minecraft.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      100% Online gaming is pretty toxic and I love being able to play at my own pace.

      Only exception to this for me was stardew with my wife.

      • Potatisen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Toxicity is one thing for sure but I don’t like how the commercialization of MP has shaped it.

        Indie games have a very different feel in their online gameplay compared to “commercial” games.

        Even way back, HL1 online and those online experiences felt so different because it was designed to be about the group experience rather than level up and get a skin, buy a weapon, our skill tree is massive. Sure technology was holding it back but I wish I could see what it would’ve been without the massive push for $$$.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      10 year old games on a 4k OLED with maxed out settings is the best. Especially if it’s a game you can run above 60 fps.

    • neo@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wait, you play games to have fun and not as a duty? What about “pride and accomplishment”? ;)

      The moment I embraced easy mode was when Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was like: “Is the gameplay we designed for our single player game too tedious? Then buy some legendary items with IRL money or maybe our XP cheat!”

      • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I hate that games started designing around microtransactions. Like who thought “hey let’s take the worst parts of MMOs and put them into single player”. I loved AC origins and was so looking forward to odyssey and then I just bounced off it within a few hours because so much of it just felt like doing chores.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Extra bonus: Odyssey was supposed to feature a female lead, rather than the choice, but a misogynistic Ubisoft exec vetoed it, which I can only assume was reason for the absolutely garbage dialog.

        • Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Everyone who looked at how much money WoW was pulling in without having to churn out game after game and figured out why

    • PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sometimes I’ll get the trainer so I can chill and feel like a badass. I could “Git gud” or better yet ill take infinite ammo and no reload and relaxingly kill everything

    • ArgillaSilmeria@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And replay games I already know by heart. I can start a new game or… play Starfox 64 again. “Do a barrel roll”.

    • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      A lot of times I start out with Normal difficulty, and a game eventually escalates its difficulty past what I am capable of delivering. At which point I find that the only way to change the difficulty is to start over, so I uninstall it.

    • Bread@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Achievement Unlocked: Mention Linux in a computer related thread!

      100% of tech related posts have this achievement.

      (Relax comrades, I too am a Linux disciple.)

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        shilling FOSS advertising. It’s the only way we can promote linux.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I almost never buy multiplayer-focused games anymore. Of course not all gamers are shitty, but enough are to matter. Having left those games behind I can see how they were taking more joy from my life than they added. If friends want to do private co-op that’s cool, but it’s also rarer now that we’re all older.

    As far as sales go, I love playing a year or two behind new releases. Patched games at a discount ftw and timing doesn’t matter in single-player games.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      To me, multiplayer video games should be about having fun with friends. Couch co-op, LAN parties, online multiplayer work for different genres and depending where your friends are. I don’t care if they’re older games, newer games, as long as it’s fun and interesting.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I don’t really care to play with strangers and none of my friends have ever asked to play so I also stick to single player games when I do play.

  • cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I only play single player games, but couldn’t care less about achievements. It is all about exploration, story, game mechanics and modding for me.

    People treat achievements as if they are a status symbol. I mean sure, if you don’t know what else to do in a game, they can give you some goal, but IMO the game itself should encourage you to reach the goal, not some external badge. The experience doing the task should be the reward in of itself.

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love any game with a handcrafted map and some exploration. Even Satisfactory, a factory building game, does an excellent job at that. Procedural generation has its uses but lacks soul I guess.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Only silly people flaunt achievements. I use them as a meta-gaming guideline, which in a good game leads to interesting and fun challenges. In an RPG, it’s like a check box for getting every ultimate weapon, fighting every boss, etc.

      Can also give me something to do in a game I’ve played but loved. Retroachevements for instance encouraged me replay SaGa (aka Final Fantasy Legend) with only one character in the team. Wasn’t too hard, but definitely a second playthrough thing.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, the issue with that is that achievements are global over all playthroughs, so it doesn’t really work as a checklist.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          True, if and when I ever get around to replaying things that could be a problem (although the industry has seen to remaking everything I cared about, sometimes poorly, but that’s another problem).

          Another shout-out to the nerds running retroachevements though because they thought it that; they have an encore mode that let’s you redo achievements. Although honestly you could just make a second account, that stuff is for emulated content anyway and it’s not like it’s DRMed, haha.

    • Absolute_Axoltl@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There used to be an effort made with how you play a game to get achievements. The Orange box was a great example of this. The ‘Little Rocket Man’ and ‘The One Free bullet’ achievements both made you play the game in a different way. Sadly now it’s mostly just ‘play the game’ ‘collect all the things’.

    • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      depends on the game, achievement hunting can be a lot of fun in a game u already love its just more stuff to do and more reasons to play, sure if all the achievements in a game are things like getting all of a collectible or beating certain story missions/quests they are pretty boring but in pdx map simulators for example many of the are interesting run ideas or they indicate where the hand crafted content is at. And despite how much i love the game i dont think i would have played as much of Tyranny as i did if i hadnt decide to get all the achievements.

    • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      bruh factorio is literally in active development and has a huge active community, who would even think twice seeing someone playing it.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve been playing Planet Crafter waaay too much. Check it out if you like Factorio, Satisfactory, etc. It’s fun and super addictive. At least to me.

        • Subverb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve played DSP, it’s a great game too. I’ll probably jump back to that when I burn out on Planet Crafter. The thing I don’t like about it and Satisfactory is conveyor belt management. The constant battle to rewire the spaghetti.

          • Hexarei@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            DSP recently got localized small distribution drones, you can convert any storage box into a tiny logistics station now. It’s pretty sweet, really reduces the spaghetti early on in recent playthroughs

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Here I am playing games from the 90s and 00s. Crazy that Quake III and Unreal Tournament are still active.

      • onlooker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I often use UT, Q3 and CS 1.6 as examples of how long a game can stay active when players are given tools to setup their own servers, as opposed to companies handling multiplayer themselves (and often killing it off in a few years).