It is penis?
It is penis
penis, it is
It penis is
Penis, is it?
Penis, innit?
in penis
d o c k i n g
And I was having such a good day too. Why would you do this to me?
What’s wrong? Did you want your lady dragonflies to be filled with someone else’s jizz?
Risky click of the day.
spoiler:
It was a family guy clip
Soo… They share jizz? I mean, what else would you do with a flying shovel penis?
what else would you do with a flying shovel penis?
What WOULDN’T you do with such a marvel?? 😂
I adore that they make a little heart shape
Interesting. Yet another thing I didn’t need to know, but interesting regardless.
There’s some thought that this is also the reason for the shape of the human penis
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490400200105
Which really makes you think, shouldn’t longer-penised individuals have an reproductive advantage over short-penised people? Longer penises can scoop deeper in the couchhole to get out other people’s jizz. Why hasn’t humanity evolved such that every male had 20 cm (7.8 in) penises?
Or make it up with more strokes, so longer intercourse.
Why hasn’t humanity evolved such that every male had 20 cm (7.8 in) penises?
Oh dear, no one tell him he got the short end of the genes…
Joking, of course.
I would assume penises didn’t need to evolve to be that long on average since vaginas are not that deep on average? So there would only be so much depth to reach in the first place. Possibly girth would also affect it - having a long noodle dick might mean no matter how deep you go, the penis might not be wide enough to effectively “scoop” it out.
Again assuming, but after a certain length (bottoming out), width would become more important
Iirc humans already have way bigger penises than other apes
couchhole
I love this.
So does JD.
The longer the penis, the larger the fraction of women who will find sex with that person painful, and at some point the reproductive advantage of scooping out others’ semen will be nullified due to the fact that no woman wants to sleep with you. I think I read that four inches is the length that most women find comfortable, but I don’t remember where I read it.
Four? 😐 That’s under average!
Average size != average comfort level
Wouldn’t an evolutionary advantage tend to make it equal?
Well, humans have pretty varied sizes. I am talking very generally, on average
Longer penises can scoop deeper in the couchhole
VANCE!
We kind of have. Human penises are waaaay bigger than those of other primate species, and many other mammals (relative to overall body size).
Poor, poor gorillas, they never stood a chance.
its theorized that’s why human penises are also shaped the way they are
They do be shaped the way that they are
Ducks have a screw, cats have barbs, dogs have like, a stopper that blocks other humpers.
Huh… This whole time I’ve just been using my tongue.
This implies that there’s some sort of evolutionary advantage to getting sloppy seconds. I don’t know how I feel about that.
Oh, so that’s why it’s such a turn on, it’s evolutionary advantage!
No that’s the gay.
If being gay (not bi) is so obviously an evolutionary disadvantage, how does it exist in humans and animals in statistically significant numbers?
Because we like it and liking things is reason to live.
It doesn’t matter how long you live if you have no offspring. It feels like, statistically, gay people really shouldn’t exist. Yet here we are.
Hi, it’s me, the strangely existing gay person!
Species survive not just as individuals, but as groups.
And long, long, long may you exist and be happy, NikkiDimes.
OK. May your life be full of love and… er, … satisfaction.
The Benny Benassi kind?
Turns out there may be more to this evolution thing than ‘first past the post’. Non-reproductive members of a species can help other members of the species to survive.
Essentially it’s not about getting “my genes” into the next generation, it’s really about getting the genes of “my species” into the next generation, and beyond.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780124201903000302
https://theconversation.com/homosexuality-may-have-evolved-for-social-not-sexual-reasons-128123
That makes a lot of sense.
Well, do you think women consent was at thing break in the early days of homo sapiens?
Yes I do. Do I think every sex was consensual? No. Do I think at least 1% of women had at one point consented to sex? Yes.
nah poligamy were just the norm
Polyamory is the word you’re looking for polygamy assumes marriage
oh, i didn’t knew that thanks
However “-amory” implies romantic relationships. We’re talking sexual interactions, not love.
When discussing animal social behaviours, “polygamy” is used.
Everyone loves a good underdog story.
Everyone loves a good raw dog story.
ftfy
You know what else is an evolutionary advantage? Not equating women with left over food.
I wasn’t equating women with anything, nor making any sort of generalization. If that’s what you saw in that, that’s on you.
“Sloppy seconds” in the context of sex is inherently sexist slutshaming regardless of whether you’re aware of it or not.
Female human here. I’ve honestly always just read it literally, a person having sex second in a multiple partner scenario, and it being sloppy down there for all involved. There’s just as much guy in the statement as there is girl, doesn’t seem all that problematic to me.
Female humans on the internet?
Impossible. I call bullshit.
Please don’t tell on me, I don’t want to go back to the bad place.
Second human woman here, I concur. I always just thought that term implied the…goopiness of the act itself in a humorous way
Goopiness is a great word.
We are animals, monogamy is not a part of humanity like it is in penguins.
Our penises reshaped over millenia of orgies just to get all the other guys cum out. We are sluts of the animal world, like rabbits
I learned about this from a book I really enjoyed called Nature’s Nether Regions. The part about spiders was pretty weird as well.