• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      LLMs have been foundational to search engines going back to the 90s. Sam Altman is simply doing a clever job of marketing them as something new and magical

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re thinking of Machine Learning and neural networks. The first “L” in LLM stands for “Large”; what’s new about these particular neural networks is the scale at which they operate. It’s like saying a modern APU from 2024 is equivalent to a Celeron from the early 90s; technically they’re in the same class, but one is much more complicated and powerful than the other.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re late lol. Phone assistants such as Siri, Bixby, Google Assistant etc. have already been AI search engines for years. People just didn’t really consider it until it got more advanced but it’s always been there.

      • BarHocker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Nah, I don’t feel like Bixby etc. fit that description. You couldn’t ask them how to fix certain problems or find websites relating to a topic the way you can LLMs. However, that would be a major use of search engines. For example, you would search “how to submit a tax report”, " how to install printer xy driver", or “videogame xy item”. All this bixby etc. are useless for.

        Bixby etc. was more meant as a iteration of how to interact with phones in addition to touching.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    What tech support department doesn’t have the “ask the stuffed bear on the counter in the corner out loud your question before asking tech support” system in place ?

      • Yes. Or an orb containing bouncing lasers on its unique internal surface containing geometrical matrix identities it can use to communicate advanced concepts to you in the form of energy. Check out how Dream plays Minecraft (or Minetest) right now. That’s still all based on cubic fractals that store energy, just like the Mandelbrot Set or a God, or even a God of gaps that can explain things and “spread enlightment through history”.

        The future is all laser orbs and I think I can have a future with a loving God right now.

        Ever watched Haruhi or Red Dwarf?

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    What a feature. Blueskyians really don’t like birdsite.

    Also, hope somebody finds this comment (& Lemmy) via web search

    Possible Twitter screenshot

  • sharkbelly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They have bumbled backwards into a new flavor of rubber duck debugging. Considering the likelihood of a rubber duck bullshitting you, I know which I’ll be interrogating.

  • aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    A problem well stated is a problem half-solved.

    Charles Kettering

    Charles Franklin Kettering (August 29, 1876 – November 25, 1958) sometimes known as Charles Fredrick Kettering[1] was an American inventor, engineer, businessman, and the holder of 186 patents.[2] He was a founder of Delco, and was head of research at General Motors from 1920 to 1947. Among his most widely used automotive developments were the electrical starting motor[3] and leaded gasoline.[4] In association with the DuPont Chemical Company, he was also responsible for the invention of Freon refrigerant for refrigeration and air conditioning systems. At DuPont he also was responsible for the development of Duco lacquers and enamels, the first practical colored paints for mass-produced automobiles. While working with the Dayton-Wright Company he developed the “Bug” aerial torpedo, considered the world’s first aerial missile.[5] He led the advancement of practical, lightweight two-stroke diesel engines, revolutionizing the locomotive and heavy equipment industries. In 1927, he founded the Kettering Foundation, a non-partisan research foundation, and was featured on the cover of Time magazine in January 1933.

  • DrFuggles@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    To be fair, I’ve written countless stack overflow posts detailing my problems in hope someone would be able to spot the mistake or error only for me to realize what it was along the way and never even submitting it.

    And I didn’t even need a 🦆 for it

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, it’s a well known technique in programming called “rubber duck debugging”.

      The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging.

      But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It’s weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT

    • Contravariant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Education has really failed to impress upon people the importance of asking questions. It’s amazing how much time is wasted on making people learn answers to questions they don’t even know how to ask.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think that’s why questions aren’t asked. I find questions aren’t asked because of ego. Nobody wants to look like they don’t know things. Lots of people will judge others for asking questions. I’m a question guy and it always surprised me how other people just knew things and didn’t ask questions. But I soon started to realize that they don’t know as much as they want others to think. They just have a high value for more independent thinking.

      • sharkbelly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The most valuable tool I ever got (as a tutor/teacher) was Socratic Questioning. Students not only benefit from its application but it also helps to impress upon them the value (and relative skill) to asking thoughtful questions.

        I don’t mean to sound like a Mom for Liberty, but to my mind, the American public education system (probably others) is not about developing intelligence but rather preparing children for work and keeping them busy/safe while their parents work, and I’d argue it’s not very good at its primary function. The ones who escape with curiosity, capacity, and confidence intact are woefully rare if you care about power to the people and thankfully rare if you care about keeping people easy to control.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          On top of that, it doesn’t even do a good job of preparing kids for work since the majority of jobs will be in a team based environment while schools focus on individual/isolated learning almost exclusively.

          The modern school system was largely developed around the early 1900s with the intent of creating factory line workers: people who could remember and perform 2 or 3 repetitive tasks. This is further compounded by the rise of standardized testing, which provides a good base level for quality of subjects across the range of individual teacher’s skills but has become an administrative crutch that puts test scores above everything else, leading to a cycle where kids are taught only to remember stuff long enough to pass the next test and then dump it from memory for the next set of test subjects.

          Schooling needs a major revision from the ground up for the modern age.

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You needed a duck. You used one. It didn’t really look like a duck but it served the same purpose.