I know they’ve always been on Lemmy, but it seems like the past few weeks it’s slowly increasing, making me want to just stay on beehaw /local. Showing up on more communities, even on instances that ban that type of trolling explicitly.
Anyone else notice this?
Note: When I’m saying Tankie here, I’m not referring to far leftists, socialists, anti-capitalists, etc. I’m talking about trolls that act leftist but their actual intent is to cause infighting and support authoritarian regimes. Sealioning, all that stuff.
I haven’t noticed much of an uptick per se, at least in the posts I’ve seen browsing all. There was a recent uptick in low-effort America bad posting out of certain communities, but I haven’t seen much in the way of red fascist bs.
Imagine if you could easily tell if someone was an unhinged asshole IRL if they had a tattoo on their forehead that said “Grad” or “Hexbear.”
Fortunately on Fedi it’s exactly like that and you can see which home instance people come from right next to their usernames.
“Tankies” are most likely russian troll farm folk cosplaying as leftists in an attempt to re-elect donald. They desperately want to divide the left and calve off biden voters.
This is exactly right. It’s genuinely disappointing how few people realize it.
Block all Tankies and move on. They’re not real people with real viewpoints. There is no point in conversing with them.
I don’t want to block them, I want to get them out of the fediverse. Lemmy will fail if it can’t get rid of the extremist political propaganda.
How dare you insinuate that people aren’t coincidentally voicing how much they hate {Insert American President} during an election year!
That might be worth a listen for you. There’s lots of reason for a lot of people to dislike biden. If your choice is between Trump and a guy that’s actively supporting genocide, I can’t blame you for not voting.
To be clear, I’d vote biden, but I can’t blame people for not voting.
I can, considering the chances of Trump intensifying support of the genocide is 100%
Imagine choosing between genocide and genocide and still thinking you have a choice.
Imagine thinking only one issue has ever existed.
My brother in Christ, when the “moral” wing of the single corpo party supports sidestepping congress to do genocide, there’s nothing to save.
Ah, so it’s not about choice, it’s about pretending you have no choice because it’s easier to give up than actually do something.
Tell me how voting for a pro genocide “party” that when its mid right corpo establishment was even remotely challenged went to court to have it ruled they’re a private organization that does what it wants and moves the goalposts every time a third 0arty approaches the requirements for inclusion does literally anything?
You live and die by this “save us from trump then fix it” narrative but YOUR party already explicitly cut off all routes to change. You’re blue MAGA screaming how only you can save the country. Hell your Mommy went on TV like a week ago and said anybody unhappy with Biden should stfu and eat a dick.
When the “moral” wing of our singular corporate party is all in on genocide, there’s nothing to save anyway - you’re just fighting for your comfortable status quo no matter who goes down for it. You’re throwing Palestinians under the bus to protect it and hide behind q pride flag but in a cycle or two when they gun for lgbtq you’ll be making excuses for them too.
@Zorque @Alto @Facebones @Gonkulator @Nia_The_Cat @JayTreeman y’all!
If that helps, think that you also have a choice between someone who supports freedom and democracy in Europe and someone who would tell Russia to do whatever the hell it wants.
I’m not American here but this is the kind of situation that you aren’t voting for the candidate but against something much worse
It’s kicking the can down the road on status quo US policies vs the complete destruction of democracy, but if y’all want to sit out and let Trump get elected, fuck y’all.
I can. Because it’s shortsighted, especially when we already had four years of Trump as an example of what would happen. It’s not like they can say “It’s possible he’d be better!” because we have clear examples that he wouldn’t.
If your choice is between having your house burn down and your toilet overflowing… you don’t just leave the house and never return. You take the toilet overflowing and fix it. Because just leaving it means someone else who’s more responsible has to clean up your mess.
There’s zero chance that that poll was conducted properly. It claims that Trump is getting more Black support than any Republican since Eisenhower this year. That even includes Trump himself from both 4 and 8 years ago!
It’s actually very possible. Black conservative voices look a lot like Trump. Tim Scott, for example; he’s got a nice face, and he seems like a kind person since he always talks up a positive message (“compassionate conservatism”), but his policies align very, very closely with Trump and the far-right elements that have taken over the Republican party. Anecdotally, I’ve known a number of black men in north Georgia that very strongly support Trump.
FiveThirtyEight recently covered this. And it’s looking bad. Bad enough that we–by which I mean people that support a genuine democracy in the US–can’t afford to sit this vote out, even if we believe that Biden’s support for Israel is awful. Because we know Trump is going to be even worse there, and worse in every possible way.
They didn’t vote for him the last time. Or the time before then. Occam’s razor overwhelmingly favors polling error.
The issue is that not voting because you can’t stand either candidate looks exactly the same as not voting because you like both of them equally and don’t mind which of them rules you.
And to be clear, the choice is not Trump vs Genocide. They both support genocide. Trump even more so.
I understand it, but I don’t forgive it.
@Gonkulator one of them that is the most active really is a Russian living in the West, yet is rolling Kremlin propaganda like crazy. You can find him on Mastodon as well, with his real name displayed on his website.
In fact the only comments ive ever had removed on lemmy was me pointing out this very fact. They are quite sensitive to it being said.
Funnily enough, this happening to me this morning is exactly what inspired this post
Interesting. Seems a bit suspicious.
Not really since i’ve been focused on beehaw insteadof lemmy.ml, but I’m also happy to see someone articulating what these trolls are: shills for authoritarian regimes.
A few days ago, a mildly critical comment of mine against Netanyahu was removed by the lemmy.world mods.
I said something like, both Netanyahu and Hamas want this war. Not too controversial, I would think.
It was in a thread on lemmy.ml
Anyway, I ditched my lemmy.world account and made this alt my main.
But yeah, the bots and propagandists have found lemmy, too. They seem to be focussing on the bigger instances.
That would be removed for saying that hamas want the war not for criticism against bb. You can’t be even the slightest bit anti Palestine.
Damn
.worldmods going into other instances to police the comments of their own users.Fucked up.
The more I read about .world the more I’m convinced it’s run by feds.
The more I read their moderators comments the more I can’t help but feel similarly. Such a strong condescending tone, it’s like every comment has the clown emoji embedded into it.
I think the reality is much simpler, they’re run by people who see themselves as mainstream social media providers, just on the fediverse. And along with mastodon.world, they’re not wrong.
Personally I have not but my instance is defederated from several of these.
Unfortunately, I think there’s no reason to believe these people are insincere in their beliefs.
Wasn’t HexBear down for a bit and a lot of people were making accounts on Lemmy.ml or something.
.ml is really just a way for the hexbear clowns to circumvent their defederarion. If you filter that shithole out also, it’s a lot better experience here.
I think they were more on grad, at least there was an admin post there telling the refugees to behave.
Thank you for the correction. I think you are right.
The accounts I’ve seen are in other locations. It also doesn’t feel like the Hexbear crowd as they have a specific way of arguing.
I’m not sure. It could have to do with certain instances connecting to new communities or maybe there was a popular post bringing more people to the fediverse.
Might be worth seeing if there was a surge in new members.
I’m mainly seeing people who love using the word “enshittifation”.
It reminds me of the time the kids learned the word “snowflake”
Bonus points to those who have a hissy fit after someone responds to the claim and to those who say “trust me” after you claim it’s ridiculous
It is a meaningless term now since it is used to mean something is shitty instead of the specific transition from something useful into an ad infested hellscape.
Any term with a precise meaning becomes muddked and generic the more popular it becomes as people see it used without the context to let them kmow what it means. I would try to coin a new term for it, but why bother when it will lose all meaning in a few months?
I’m also really tired of this word honestly. Yes, we know it’s happening and see it all around us. It’s kind of been doing it for 20 years, so it’s just kind of funny since the word just popped up in these circles and now its run rampant and is beginning to lose its meaning, saying it about any business or service that is looking to make profit.
Not that I disagree, just like yeah guys we get it, everything everywhere sucks, pointing it out every 30 seconds doesn’t really do much if we aren’t actively taking actions against it, which gets into the whole “then we have to bring it up know about it” and the cycle repeats itself.
Yep. They come in waves whenever there’s a hot-button issue happening. Same thing as all the RWNJs. They away their programming and then hit the message boards/forums with their up-to-date-rhetoric.
/r/all was a fucking nightmare on reddit, and I don’t think the equivalent here is that much better either, if I’m being honest.
I find that life is more pleasant when I stick to local and/or my subscriptions, block the communities I’m not interested in, and filter out whatever remains.
Personally, I do not get scrolling through /all … pretty much the opposite of what social media is about as far as I’m concerned. Explore for new things etc, sure. But that only makes sense occasionally. Treating as a main feed just seems insane to me.
It doesn’t make sense to me to put yourself in a corner where you only ever see people who think like you. It seems counter to services that provide connections between people across the globe.
I guess different strokes for different folks :)
I want connections across the globe that add something to my day, if I wanted random BS then I’d turn on the TV.
If you think that only things that you understand and are comfortable with will add to your day… you’re free to think that :)
But I don’t see things that make me think or challenge my worldview on all. It’s just pages and pages of pointless memes.
If I want that, I have to seek it out in specific communities, which I then subscribe to.
Like I said, explore all you want to find new things. But treating /all like a feed to the point that you get concerned about what shows up on there, especially on the fediverse, seems like a poor choice.
It’s not just about echo chambers. Please break out of echo chambers (though it’s ironic that this comes up under this patent post). But it’s social media, finding your people or the ones that push your boundaries is the point, building communities in those spaces, contributing and helping and creating good vibes. Not tuning into the chaos tv of the firehose and then getting upset at some antagonistic politics.
If there’s a real moderation issue to consider here, act on it, find the accounts, bring receipts and work together. But this thread/post just seems silly and inflammatory to me … my communities are doing just fine, I’d bet whatever trolls were seen were in the sorts of communities you’d expect.
If there’s a real moderation issue to consider here, act on it, find the accounts, bring receipts and work together. But this thread/post just seems silly and inflammatory to me … my communities are doing just fine, I’d bet whatever trolls were seen were in the sorts of communities you’d expect.
People are allowed to point out issues in things, no offense intended. I’m not going to sit and pretend nothing is going on and let the equivalent of a nazi bar form silently.
The trolls are on very large instances, and have continued to have accounts, despite reports, as well as rules against that behavior in those large instances, some of those trolls being community moderators on large instances. Not all of them are from the ones you’d expect, quite the opposite. I’m not pointing out names specifically for the reason of not stirring drama. Reports have already been made, to both those instances admins again, as well as Beehaw directly, with receipts to let them all figure it out how they feel best to do so for the community. Now is just discussion about the overall issue in a community that’s intended for discussion of topics that don’t fit anywhere else.
There isn’t any harm in not being silent on an issue that Lemmy notoriously has had very blatantly since its inception. This is a process that happens every time these groups stray outside of their usual areas.
All good … I’m personally very happy for you to have this chat FWIW. If I came as someone trying to shut down a conversation, I apologise. It wasn’t my intent. I was replying to a comment about /all which resonated with me so I thought I’d add my thoughts.
And if my tone comes off as too negative/harsh … I can see that too.
Otherwise, as far as my personal general motivations are concerned (again, FWIW) … I’m just not sure about this concern over trolls. Yes they’re here, as well as a number of blatently rude people. IMO, a cultural issue that the fediverse can suffer from is context-free drama and rumour milling. Thus my call to actually acting on moderation issues with evidence and cooperation etc. I’m not saying you’re engaging in that sort of behaviour, but this post did seem to me to be heading in that direction (thus my comments).
For me, the issue is that constantly looking out for the “bad people” decays into insubstantial fear mongering and purity policing and eventually “balkanising”. For the simple reason, IMO, that it’s an addictive behaviour with a built in positive feedback loop from the engagement it tends to procure. Within that sort of dynamic, accuracy gets lost, rumours are milled, echo chambers built and a generally unpleasant community may ensue. On the other hand, organising others, collecting information, setting up communities and infrastructure, is likely to do more good and has a built in negative feedback loop from being unrewarding work such that those who persistently do it tend to really care about it (for better or worse depending on the person and cause). Maybe one is better at warding off nazi bars than the other, but I think both are capable and that the relevant factor there is how sensitive one is to “disliked” opinions, which is a valid sensitivity to be had but also an interesting dynamic in how people can disagree on how to form these spaces.
I hope that doesn’t come off as me trying to lecture you (I’d presume none of this is something you haven’t heard before) … just sharing my general background perspective on this if it’s relevant or anything.
That’s fair, I appreciate the insight on it. It tends to be a complicated issue so I don’t think there’s really any right answer to it, all the ways of trying to solving it have huge pros and cons. Guess we do really just have to trust that all of our instance admins are on-top of this stuff at the end of the day
Guess we do really just have to trust that all of our instance admins are on-top of this stuff at the end of the day
Well, moderation can be a problem too on the fediverse, right? As instances get bigger, the scaling makes moderation harder … or at least it seems that way. That’s where the call for small instances comes in … as it enables more localised moderation across the board. And I personally think that makes a lot of sense. But it’s also unworkable for any open platform/fediverse, IMO, as people tend to aggregate and the instances dynamic just doesn’t work for many (eg BlueSky is full of people that just hated the instances experience on mastodon, which IME can get more toxic than anything happening here, as, I believe, communities help with that sort of thing).
Point being (sorry, clearly I’m ranty) entirely trusting admins isn’t something I’d subscribe to either. I’ve recently pushed off from engaging on the communities on a particular instance on finding out that the mods/admins there likely suck (if you know, you probably know).
If I’d offer any attempts at helping solve the problem … I’d probably say be rules based, be clear and open about intentions and policies, all along the way, to the point of self-examination, trust that a system is better than no system but that they also have to be organic and get strength from cooperative feedback across the system especially when done in line with the other ideas.
Sorry … ranty … it was in my fingertips.
Good chat! All the best!!
I agree, but at the same time, I think a lot of people are still trying to build out their subscribed communities list here - especially because a lot of would-be communities are fragmented across multiple instances. Outside of just stumbling across communities you like because they’ve been mentioned in a comment section, or checking out communities that links have been crossposted to, looking at the all feed is the best way to discover things, I think - unfortunate though it is.
To be honest, I’d love to see a “weighted all” feed, if that’s even possible. So include everything, but let the user set custom weights for communities, so ones you weight highly show up more often (and nearer the top) and once you weight lower show up less often. There are some communities that I only really see if I look at my subscriptions because they don’t tend to show up in the all feed much. And there are some communities - a lot of meme ones, for instance - that I’ve blocked because they were clogging up the all feed; if I could just weight them lower so if still see them but far less often, I would do that instead of blocking them.
I’ve seen a few different replies on various posts that, while different, all repeat nearly identical sentiments about having to “purge” fascists with violence, for the good of humanity or whatever. I don’t think they’re bots, probably paid trolls. I believe the goal is to push a violent agenda, at least the appearance of one, in leftist communities.
I haven’t, but I’m also not really subbed to many communities that they also participate in. And my home instance is pretty cool.
This was weird to come across. Yes, actually, I did come across something just the other day. I was banned from world news @lemmy.ml for saying something along the lines of “It’s a bummer that the protests in Hong Kong didn’t work out and that the government crushed opposition.” The post in question was talking about how people from Hong Kong are traveling to mainland China for cheaper goods.
I noticed in the comments it seemed a lot of people were in support of this which seemed odd to me. But nobody had said anything that stood out to me as immediately tankie oriented.
To be fair, I don’t know if that’s why I was banned. But it’s the only thing I said, and I wasn’t given a reason. When I tried to reply to the person who replied to me, it just said I’m banned from commenting, lol.
Edit: I also have no idea what I’m doing with lemmy or how the different communities work. I came from reddit last year and my usage has dropped significantly. So it could be that I stepped into the lions den and had no idea lol
Not sure how to get to it on the apps but on the Lemmy sites there’s a modlog button at the bottom, I went to Lemmy.ml on the modlog and searched your name and it says ban reason was “Orientalism/British Colonialism” which is their usual cop-out ban reason to silence any anti-Chinese government messages over there on .ml
Edit: you definitely stepped into the lions den on .ml lol, their admins are very pro-authoritarian, anti-civil rights over there. Lemmy.ml, lemmygrad, and hexbear are the lions dens, beehaw has lemmygrad and hexbear blocked, .ml isn’t though. Unsure of the reasoning but .ml is a bit more “tame” than the other two.
Interesting lol thanks for the extra information, that’s good to know. I’ll be avoiding that section then.
I find it fascinating that people can have such varied ideas/morality. I would have never thought my take would have been considered controversial for others lol.
I think your experience is probably similar to a lot of people’s that join Lemmy. There’s certainly a lot of people on this platform with quite extreme views. Many instances got sick of them and blocked them, and in turn they think we’re liberal fascists.
I think most people by now have received bans from the world news community on lemmy.ml, including myself. I wouldn’t worry about it!
You can block by instance yourself (hexbear.net, lemmygrad.ml and lemmy.ml are the main offenders)
But this only seems to stop their threads appearing, not the users themselves. I don’t know if this is a bug in Lemmy or intentional.
How do I do that in Beehaw please, or do you just mean blocking them on mastodon itself? Thanks!
For what it’s worth Beehaw already has hexbear and lemmygrad completely defederated
That’ll be why I don’t see them! Excellent. Many thanks.
Not sure you can, Beehaw doesn’t appear to be upgraded to Lemmy 0.19 or higher.
When they do, it’s in your settings page with the other block lists.
Ah right. OK - many thanks 😊
I’ve slowly blocked extremist and other language communities.
