• JesusSon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hope all these sources get on the same page soon because I have some old head friends who read all this stuff and believe he was a Chinese national working for the Iranians, set up next to snipers in a building cleared by locals. They say he was then confronted after he climbed a ladder but before he bear-crawled 25 feet to aim, only to be interrupted by local cops forcing him to fire quickly but was killed by snipers who had been watching him use a range finder for hours.

    Please get it together, all these 50-year-old conspiracy theorists are going to start having heart attacks lol.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Gen X isn’t the problem here. It’s boomers. It’s always been boomers who were the problem.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d suggest reading the article. It gives the play by play of how the events occurred. I think you’re reading headlines and then constructing your own picture of what happened.

      • JesusSon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Bless your heart, I read it right before I posted. Thank you kindly for the advice though.

        At some point, everything I wrote was in an article just like this one, only citing “sources in (insert official entity here)” and always starting with “sources say.” Well, except for the Iranian one, that one was a separate incident but a buddy of mine mentioned it right before I read the post so I added it.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      all these 50-year-old conspiracy theorists are going to start having heart attacks lol.

      And that is a problem why?

      • JesusSon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mainly because heart attacks suck and tend to kill but also because I’m not a heartless cunt wishing death on people just because they are stupid.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Also because the heart attacks of god fearing republicans was the goal all along! The Democrats, in concert with George Soros, devised this plan in 2020. By fixing the vote, it radicalized the Trump loving shooter setting up the situation for the shooter to be the cause of the heart attacks. Its an elaborate multi-pronged plan years in the making that is only now coming to fruition…and these liburls think good republicans are stupid enough to fall for it. Pizzagate!11!1!!! /s

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is such a clown show…

    One sniper inside spotted the gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks, outside and looking up at the roof, observing the building and disappearing, according to the officer who spoke to CBS News. The sniper observed Crooks as he returned to the building, sat down and looked at his phone. At that point, one of the local snipers took a picture of Crooks.

    Next, the local sniper observed Crooks looking through a rangefinder, an instrument routinely used by marksmen to determine the distance of a target, and he immediately radioed to the command post, according to the local law enforcement officer. The local sniper also attempted to send the photo of the gunman up the chain of command.

    Officials then lost track of Crooks, who disappeared, but soon returned for a third time with a backpack. The local sniper team called for backup — alerting the command post that the gunman had a backpack and was walking toward the back of the building.

    Two other municipal police officers who heard the call for back-up attempted to climb onto the roof. Butler County Sheriff Michael Sloupe told CBS Pittsburgh station KDKA that an armed municipal officer with Butler Township was hoisted by another officer onto the roof of the building where the gunman had taken a position. Crooks focused his rifle towards the officer who ultimately let go, falling off the roof. Moments later, the shooter began firing into the crowd.

    In a reasonable world, Crooks wouldn’t have even been allowed to go near the building. In a less reasonable world, Crooks would have been confronted by armed men as soon as they saw him look through a rangefinder. In a world that was the least bit reasonable, Crooks would have been shot the moment he took a gun out of his bag. But here we are.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re forgetting that this stuff is very often just security theater and many officers are playing dress up. When shit goes down, nobody is ever prepared even when they have the correct training.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That’s the biggest problem–there is no best of the best. It’s all just hubris and who you are connected to. What separates someone in the secret service from a regular police officer is who they know and probably what sort of military background they have.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      In a reasonable world Crooks wouldn’t have had that weapon to begin with

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apart from all the actual missed confrontations, it seems like you should just pay someone to be up on any building that’s a security risk. They don’t have to be super vigilant or highly trained, just the equivalent of a traffic cop working a construction site. Their presence alone would remove it as a threat.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Y’all keep saying “Reasonable world”, but then Trump exists in that world, so I have no fucking clue what y’all are on about.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    pulls out range finder from ~130 yards away. Proceeds to miss 7/8 shots completely on a 6ft3" 240lb man from the prone.

    • scops@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      5 months ago

      He was a 20 year old kid who knew he was seconds away from death, who had just scared off a cop who had come up the ladder after him. I’m not sympathetic for him, but I could understand him being jittery and missing. Paper and clays don’t shoot back. It’s not true practice.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yah, jesus, I get shaky just lining up a nice sized deer still, and I’ve been hunting for years. And I don’t have anyone breathing down my neck and 30 seconds to shoot.

        The fact he just barely missed with a shitty AR-15 at over a hundred yards is a minor miracle.

    • CTDummy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      Didn’t the first shot only miss because Trump turned his head? After the first one you’ve got to deal with recoil/nerves.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I didn’t hear anything suggesting he used irons, that’d be a very odd choice. Most modern ARs don’t come with irons or an optic and you can get red dots much better than just irons for under $200.

        And irons would decidedly be harder but 100 yards still is very achievable by a novice who follows fundamentals.

        • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Sorry, in this case I’m referring to no magnification. Your right that’s there’s a bunch of things that could be sights without it being irons.

          The photos and media speculation seem to suggest that there wasn’t a scope.

          ——

          I still don’t think this is as easy as people make it out to be. Yes, a novice could put a tight grouping downrange - but could they do that on their first shot, on a hot metal roof, with adrenaline pumping.

          I know it typically takes me a few rounds at the range to get dialed in.

      • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think it’s easier than you think, especially from prone and especially if you have any previous experience, which I assume the shooter did.

        Here’s a page out of a US military training manual to get an idea of how “wide” the front sight looks on a human size target. And remember, Trump is considerably wider than these silhouettes.

        • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve shot rifles. It’s not hard to do at a range after you’ve dialed yourself in.

          It’s a lot harder to pull off on the first shot under pressure on a hot roof.

          • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah I guess that’s a fair point.

            And at the end of the day, it was clearly difficult for him, or he wouldn’t have missed so many times.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apparently, he tried to join his school’s rifle club but was rejected for having terrible marksmanship.

        • scoobford@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not commenting on whether that’s true or not, but it isn’t how it works in the south. If you want to play high school soccer or whatever, you have to quality by doing well in middle school. Some places, middle school is competitive enough to warrant tryouts.

          Extracurriculars are also rapidly getting more expensive. Too many parents want to pretend their kids are in the NFL or NBA or whatever.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          ¯⁠\_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ I’m just relaying what I read in the news. I agree that it’s dumb for a club (as opposed to a competitive rifle “team”) to be like that, but it’s allegedly what happened nonetheless.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    If only there was ONE MORE GUN OFFICER SNIPER he would NOT have been able to get a shot off!

      • sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Cymraeg
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Trump wasn’t carrying. There’s your problem. He didn’t have self-defense and white boy goated with the sauce almost caught him lacking, but instead of busting it down sexual style he let us down failure style

  • poorlytunedAstring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the fundamental problem with protecting a candidate whose entire base is really big on guns, big on having guns on them, big on using every inch of their already permissive rights, and no matter what, the candidate’s rally is a highly likely place for them to flex their pieces, even if they can only wave them around in the parking lot.

    You can’t just do the obvious thing and put rounds in everyone you see with a rifle. White girls are going to be out in the parking lot doing influencer dances with AR-15s. The muzzle might wave in Trump’s direction while she boot scoots. We don’t know what kind of orders that sniper had, but probably something along the lines of “look all these fuckers are going to be strapped if they can be strapped, stay chilly on the trigger and think twice, take no shots without orders.”

    By the time anybody acted like a clear threat, the bullets were already flying. So what if he had a rangefinder? That doesn’t count as a “pull trigger now” level threat, not with this crowd. What an absolute bastard of a thing to provide overwatch for, you know?

    • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You would think, though, that it would be a “get some guys with guns onto that roof before he comes back” sign. 20 minutes is plenty of time to get at least some guys with pistols/their own AR-15s over there to secure the area. Also, simply having the right to own and carry weapons doesn’t give you the right to point them at people intentionally, much less set up a sniper’s nest on a divisive public figure. If a random guy in the crowd started pointing his pistol at Trump, then I’m fairly certain that would give Secret Service the right to at least tackle the guy or tase him, not to mention all the other people who would rush to control him.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is the fundamental problem with protecting a candidate whose entire base is really big on guns, big on having guns on them, big on using every inch of their already permissive rights, and no matter what, the candidate’s rally is a highly likely place for them to flex their pieces, even if they can only wave them around in the parking lot.

      If police snipers started opening up on random people at a Trump rally who were simply parading around their most tacti-cool looking hardware, imagine how much safer the convention could be.

      You can’t just do the obvious thing and put rounds in everyone you see with a rifle.

      They absolutely can and they absolutely should. Treat the RNC like its Oakland during the OJ Riots or New Orleans during a hurricane. Just start blasting anyone who looks vaguely threatening and don’t stop until you feel safe again.

      Anyone who argues otherwise simply isn’t serious when they say “Blue Lives Matter”. I mean, ffs, can you even imagine what the world would have lost if Thomas Matthew Crooks had adjusted his aim and hit one of our brave servicemen?

      Every single American police officer needs to treat these thugs and their guns with absolute seriousness. Lives are on the line. And not just the lives of school children. Important ones.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is pretty much my thinking. The sniper likely thought the kid was setting up a picture from the rooftop or something, and didn’t want to shoot someone so young when they may very well be doing something harmless.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Kind of surprising they didn’t blast him as soon as he pulled out the rangefinder.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    lol all comments preferring a fascist be shot than giving the chance to implement fascism get removed. Its just like reddit now.

      • rhandyrhoads@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Get removed is referring to the commenters. Maybe a comma would have saved that sentence, but you’d have to be really good with commas.

        • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Oh shit, you’re right! I had some trouble reading that comment. It makes a whole lot more sense now!

          And yeah, I too had a comment removed by some overzealous reddit-tier garbage mod.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Being US president is like one of the most dangerous professions in the world. And that is the example of the level of expertise the US has in protecting one of the most dangerous jobs in the world.