• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My understanding is that they sent V’Ger a command to do “something,” and then the gibberish it was sending changed, and that was the “here’s everything” signal.

    And yeah, I’m calling it V’Ger from now on.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think the term “metal” is overused, but this is probably the most metal thing a programmer could possibly do besides join a metal band.

  • FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I wonder how it is secured, or could anyone with a big enough transmitter reprogram it at will…

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To me, the physics of the situation makes this all the more impressive.

    Voyager has a 23 watt radio. That’s about 10x as much power as a cell phone’s radio, but it’s still small. Voyager is so far away it takes 22.5 hours for the signal to get to earth traveling at light speed. This is a radio beam, not a laser, but it’s extraordinarily tight beam for a radio, with the focus only 0.5 degrees wide, but that means it’s still 1000x wider than the earth when it arrives. It’s being received by some of the biggest antennas ever made, but they’re still only 70m wide, so each one only receives a tiny fraction of the power the power transmitted. So, they’re decoding a signal that’s 10^-18 watts.

    So, not only are you debugging a system created half a century ago without being able to see or touch it, you’re doing it with a 2-day delay to see what your changes do, and using the most absurdly powerful radios just to send signals.

    The computer side of things is also even more impressive than this makes it sound. A memory chip failed. On Earth, you’d probably try to figure that out by physically looking at the hardware, and then probing it with a multimeter or an oscilloscope or something. They couldn’t do that. They had to debug it by watching the program as it ran and as it tried to use this faulty memory chip and failed in interesting ways. They could interact with it, but only on a 2 day delay. They also had to know that any wrong move and the little control they had over it could fail and it would be fully dead.

    So, a malfunctioning computer that you can only interact with at 40 bits per second, that takes 2 full days between every send and receive, that has flaky hardware and was designed more than 50 years ago.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there a Voyager 1, uh…emulator or something? Like something NASA would use to test the new programming on before hitting send?

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Today you would have a physical duplicate of something in orbit to test code changes on before you push code to something in orbit.

    • chimasterflex@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Finally I can put some take into this. I’ve worked in memory testing for years and I’ll tell you that it’s actually pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time. So much so that what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells. We add more memory cells than we might activate at any given time. When shit goes awry, we can reprogram the memory controller to remap the used memory cells so that the bad cells are mapped out and unused ones are mapped in. We don’t probe memory cells typically unless we’re doing some type of in depth failure analysis. usually we just run a series of algorithms that test each cell and identify which ones aren’t responding correctly, then map those out.

      None of this is to diminish the engineering challenges that they faced, just to help give an appreciation for the technical mechanisms we’ve improved over the last few decades

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells

        Do you know how long that has been going on? Because Voyager is pretty old hardware.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time

        50 years is plenty of time for the first memory chip to fail most systems would face total failure by multiple defects in half the time WITH physical maintenance.

        Also remember it was built with tools from the 70s. Which is probably an advantage, given everything else is still going

        • orangeboats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also remember it was built with tools from the 70s. Which is probably an advantage

          Definitely an advantage. Even without planned obsolescence the olden electronics are pretty tolerant of any outside interference compared to the modern ones.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They have spare Voyager on Earth for debugging

      EDOT: or not

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And you explained all of that WITHOUT THE OBNOXIOUS GODDAMNS and FUCKIN SCIENCE AMIRITEs

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh screw that, that’s an emotional post from somebody sharing their reaction, and I’m fucking STOKED to hear about it, can’t believe I missed the news!

  • trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just have to imagine how interesting of a challenege that is. Kinda like when old games only had 300kb to store all their data on so you had to program cool tricks to get it all to work.

    • tarix29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No yeah, it’s like that plus the thing is a light day away, and on top of that malfunctioning on a hardware level. Incredible

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s like you already have a 300kb game on a cartridge, but it doesn’t work for some unknown reason. Also you don’t actually have the cartridge, some randy in Greenland does. And they only answer emails once every 2 days or so.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Absolutely. The computers on Voyager hold the record for being the longest continuously running computer of all time.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Microsoft can’t even release a fix for Window’s recovery partition being too small to stage updates. I had to do it myself, fucking amateurs.

      • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not to mention what a bitch that partition is when you need to shrink or increase the size of your windows partition. If you need to upgrade your storage, or resize to partition to make room for other operating systems, you have to follow like 20 steps of voodoo magic commands to do it.

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Whoa learned that one at the weekend. Added a new nvme drive, cloned the old drive. I wanted to expand my linux partition, but it was at the start of the drive. So shifted all the windows stuff to the end and grew the Linux partition.

          Thought I’d boot into windows to make sure it was okay, just in case (even though I’ve apparently not booted it in 3 years). BSOD. 2-3hrs later it was working again, I’m still not sure what fixed it of I’m honest, I seemed to just rerun the same bootrec commands and repair startup multiple times, but it works now, so yay!

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Can’t or won’t? The same issue exists for both windows 10 and 11, but they haven’t closed the ticket for windows 11… Typical bullshit. It’s not exactly planned obsolescence, but when a bug comes up like that they’re just gonna grab the opportunity to go “sry impossible, plz buy new products”

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Windows 13 update log:

          Change kernel to Linux.

          Build custom OS for astrophysics and space science applications.

          happy rocket engineer noises

          • jnk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Now I’m curious. How would a NasaOS look like? Would it even be good for general use? Would they just focus on optimization? Could they finally beat Hannah Montana linux, the superior OS?

            • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think it would have a real time kernel running parallel to a linux kernel.
              Users could interact with the linux kernel normally and schedule trusted real time tasks on the other. Maybe there is reduced security for added performance on those cores.

              In general use it would be a normal stable system with the allure of a performance mode that will break your system if you are not careful.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, they only had to test it for a single hardware deployment. Windows has to be tested for millions if not billions of deployments. Say what you want, but Microsoft testers are god like.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Keep in mind too these guys are writing and reading in like assembly or some precursor to it.

    I can only imagine the number of checks and rechecks they probably go through before they press the “send” button. Especially now.

    This is nothing like my loosey goosey programming where I just hit compile or download and just wait to see if my change works the way I expect…

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      they almost certainly have a hardware spare, or at the very least, an accurately simulated version of it, because again, this is 50 year old hardware. So it’s pretty easy to just simulate it.

      But yeah they are almost certainly pulling some really fucked QA on this shit.

      • Noble Shift@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I read someplace a while back that the average beginner dev has an error for every 10 lines of code, a working dev, 100, the (I think) US Air Force 1000. NASA (& company )was at a massive single error per 100000 lines of code. I wish I could find that article.

  • Rob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interviewer: Tell me an interesting debugging story

    Interviewee: …

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Heh. Years ago during an interview I was explaining how important it is to verify a system before putting it into orbit. If one found problems in orbit, you usually can’t fix it. My interviewer said, “Why not just send up the space shuttle to fix it?”

      Well…

    • Raxiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I updated mine a couple of weeks ago. I was actually really anxious as It went through the process, but it worked fine, at first…
      Then I found out Microsoft considered it a new computer and deactivated windows. (And that’s when I found out they deleted upgrade licences from windows 7 & 8 back in September)

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a teenager I experienced a power outage while I was updating my bios.

      Guess what happened?

      I’m still bitter about it.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can negate that risk by getting a UPS. You should get a UPS in any case imo since even a shitty one lets you at least save your work and shutdown properly if your electricity drops.